Motor immaturity and specific speech and language impairment: evidence for a common genetic basis.

Previous studies have found an association between motor immaturity and specific language impairment in children. Data from two twin studies were used to address the question of whether these linked deficits have a common etiology. Study 1 involved 57 MZ and 22 DZ pairs where one or both twins had specific speech/language impairment. A control group of 173 single-born children was also tested. Motor skill was assessed using a tapping task, which was carried out with left and right hands. Tapping scores were converted to scaled scores adjusted for age and sex. Unaffected twins and single-born controls did not differ in motor skill, but twins with speech and/or language impairments obtained significantly poorer tapping scores than controls. Bivariate DeFries-Fulker analysis pointed to shared genetic influence on tapping speed and a measure of speech production accuracy. In study 2, 37 twin pairs from study 1 were retested 2-3 years later and combined with 100 twin pairs from a general population sample. A timed peg-moving task was used to assess motor skill. Children with combined speech and language impairments obtained poorer peg-moving scores than unaffected children. Bivariate DeFries-Fulker analysis found significant shared genetic variance for impairments on peg-moving and on a test of nonword repetition. It is concluded that genes that put the child at risk for communicative problems also affect motor development, with the association being most evident when speech production is affected.

[1]  A D Baddeley,et al.  The Children's Test of Nonword Repetition: a test of phonological working memory. , 1994, Memory.

[2]  D. Bishop,et al.  SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT AS A MATURATIONAL LAG: EVIDENCE FROM LONGITUDINAL DATA ON LANGUAGE AND MOTOR DEVELOPMENT , 1987, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[3]  G. Conti-Ramsden,et al.  Classification of children with specific language impairment: longitudinal considerations. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  D. Fulker,et al.  Multiple regression analysis of twin data , 1985, Behavior genetics.

[5]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neurological status of language‐impaired and normal children , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[6]  D. V. M. Bishop,et al.  Handedness, clumsiness and developmental language disorders , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  K. Stromswold,et al.  Genetics of spoken language disorders. , 1998, Human biology.

[8]  E. Hill,et al.  A dyspraxic deficit in specific language impairment and developmental coordination disorder? Evidence from hand and arm movements , 1998, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[9]  E. Hill,et al.  Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: a review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments. , 2001, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[10]  D. Bishop,et al.  Individual Differences in Handedness and Specific Speech and Language Impairment: Evidence Against a Genetic Link , 2001, Behavior genetics.

[11]  R. P. Powell,et al.  CLUMSINESS AND PERCEPTUAL PROBLEMS IN CHILDREN WITH SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT , 1992, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[12]  C Donlan,et al.  GENETIC BASIS OF SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A TWIN STUDY , 1995, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[13]  R. Nichols,et al.  The diagnosis of twin zygosity. , 1966, Acta genetica et statistica medica.

[14]  P. Wolff,et al.  Family patterns of developmental dyslexia, part II: behavioral phenotypes. , 1995, American journal of medical genetics.

[15]  P. Tallal,et al.  Different origin of auditory and phonological processing problems in children with language impairment: evidence from a twin study. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[16]  D. Bishop Genetic and environmental risks for specific language impairment in children. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  A. Tellegen,et al.  Recruitment bias in twin research: The rule of two-thirds reconsidered , 1987, Behavior genetics.

[18]  D. Bishop Genetic influences on language impairment and literacy problems in children: same or different? , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.