Chemical information transfer between wounded and unwounded plants: backing up the future

Abstract This special issue on “Chemical information transfer between wounded and unwounded plants” provides an overview of past and ongoing experiments on plant-to-plant communication. Since the studies on plant responses to single gaseous compounds were not particularly emphasised, the actual number of studies relevant to the subject is underestimated. All in all, we think the amount of data on damage-induced plant-to-plant information transfer makes that the phenomenon can no longer be denied and deserves intensified attention by the scientific community. In this epilogue we highlight a couple of issues which received little attention and present some speculative ideas. First we concentrate on functional aspects of plant-plant communication we stress the concept of damage-induced signalling as an ecological cost to the signal-sending plant and we discuss the theoretical development on interplant signalling, which is still in its infancy. With respect to mechanisms, we compare above- to belowground signalling, discuss potential cues and stress the possibility that responses in signal-exposed plants may be hidden. Finally, we address some future prospects which may help in the further development of the still underexposed phenomenon of damage-induced plant-to-plant information transfer.

[1]  M. Dicke,et al.  Within-plant circulation of systemic elicitor of induced defence and release from roots of elicitor that affects neighbouring plants , 2001 .

[2]  R. Karban Communication between sagebrush and wild tobacco in the field , 2001 .

[3]  G. Poppy,et al.  Can aphid-induced plant signals be transmitted aerially and through the rhizosphere? , 2001 .

[4]  J. Taylor,et al.  Coping with multiple enemies: an integration of molecular and ecological perspectives. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[5]  G. Laue,et al.  Methyl jasmonate is blowing in the wind, but can it act as a plant-plant airborne signal? , 2001 .

[6]  C. Ryan The systemin signaling pathway: differential activation of plant defensive genes. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[7]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Meta-analysis of laboratory experiments on plant–plant information transfer , 2001 .

[8]  M A Nowak,et al.  The evolution of language. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Augner Should a plant always signal its defence against herbivores , 1994 .

[10]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. III. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates in herbivore oral secretions are necessary and sufficient for herbivore-specific plant responses. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[11]  Han Olff,et al.  Herbivores Between Plants and Predators , 1999 .

[12]  S. Kuhara,et al.  Gene responses in bean leaves induced by herbivory and by herbivore-induced volatiles. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[13]  J. Lawton,et al.  Rapidly Induced Defenses and Talking Trees: The Devil's Advocate Position , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Richard Karban,et al.  Induced Responses to Herbivory , 1997 .

[15]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Herbivory, induced resistance, and interplant signal transfer in Alnus glutinosa , 2001 .

[16]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Defoliation of alders (Alnus glutinosa) affects herbivory by leaf beetles on undamaged neighbours , 2000, Oecologia.

[17]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .

[18]  C. Ballaré,et al.  Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signalling mechanisms. , 1999, Trends in plant science.

[19]  Junji Takabayashi,et al.  Herbivory-induced volatiles elicit defence genes in lima bean leaves , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Marcel Dicke,et al.  Parasitoid‐plant mutualism: parasitoid attack of herbivore increases plant reproduction , 2000 .

[21]  E. Nilsen,et al.  Physiology of Plants Under Stress , 1987 .

[22]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. I. Large-scale changes in the accumulation of growth- and defense-related plant mRNAs. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[23]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  A neighborhood view of interactions among individual plants , 2000 .

[24]  J. Bergelson,et al.  Interplant Communication Revisited , 1995 .

[25]  G. Laue,et al.  Communication between plants: induced resistance in wild tobacco plants following clipping of neighboring sagebrush , 2000, Oecologia.

[26]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. II. Accumulation of plant mRNAs in response to insect-derived cues. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[27]  K. Nara,et al.  Can 14 C-labeled photosynthetic products move between Pinus densiflora seedlings linked by ectomycorrhizal mycelia? , 2001, The New phytologist.

[28]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Immunological ''memory'' in the induced accumulation of nicotine in wild tobacco , 1996 .

[29]  John H. Loughrin,et al.  Diurnal cycle of emission of induced volatile terpenoids by herbivore-injured cotton plant. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  John H. Loughrin,et al.  How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Bruce A. McPheron,et al.  Interactions Among Three Trophic Levels: Influence of Plants on Interactions Between Insect Herbivores and Natural Enemies , 1980 .

[32]  A. Grafen Natural selection, kin selection and group selection [Polistes fuscatus, wasps] , 1984 .

[33]  J A Pickett,et al.  New roles for cis-jasmone as an insect semiochemical and in plant defense. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  M. Dicke,et al.  Multitrophic effects of herbivore‐induced plant volatiles in an evolutionary context , 2000 .

[35]  C. Pieterse,et al.  Salicylic acid-independent plant defence pathways. , 1999, Trends in plant science.

[36]  M. Hunter Mixed signals and cross‐talk: interactions between plants, insect herbivores and plant pathogens , 2000 .

[37]  C. Preston,et al.  Tobacco mosaic virus inoculation inhibits wound-induced jasmonic acid-mediated responses within but not between plants , 1999, Planta.

[38]  S. Rothstein,et al.  C6-volatiles derived from the lipoxygenase pathway induce a subset of defense-related genes. , 1998, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[39]  J. Bruin,et al.  Chemical information transfer between plants: back to the future , 2001 .

[40]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Does it pay plants to advertise for bodyguards? Towards a cost-benefit analysis of induced synomone production , 1989 .

[41]  D. Hildebrand,et al.  Methyl Jasmonate Exposure Induces Insect Resistance in Cabbage and Tobacco , 1997 .

[42]  Anurag A. Agrawal,et al.  Induced Plant Defenses Against Pathogens and Herbivores : Biochemistry, Ecology, and Agriculture , 1999 .

[43]  I. Baldwin Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  H. Lambers,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants , 1990 .

[45]  D. Orcutt,et al.  The Physiology of Plants Under Stress, Abiotic Factors , 1996 .

[46]  R. Tollrian,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses , 1990, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[47]  Louise E. M. Vet,et al.  Plant-carnivore interactions: evolutionary and ecological consequences for plant, herbivore and carnivore , 1999 .

[48]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Do plants tap SOS signals from their infested neighbours? , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[49]  Jamie Goode,et al.  Insect-plant interactions and induced plant defence , 1999 .

[50]  Communication between the first and third trophic levels : and analysis using biological signalling theory , 1995 .

[51]  R. Karban,et al.  Induced Resistance and Susceptibility to Herbivory: Plant Memory and Altered Plant Development , 1995 .

[52]  Maurice W. Sabelis,et al.  Should all plants recruit bodyguards? : conditions for a polymorphic ESS of synomone production in plants , 1988 .

[53]  H. Matsumoto,et al.  Rapid magnetic reconnection in the Earth’s magnetosphere mediated by whistler waves , 2001, Nature.

[54]  H. J. Zeringue,et al.  Effects of methyl jasmonate on phytoalexin production and aflatoxin control in the developing cotton boll , 2002 .

[55]  M. Baalen,et al.  The evolution of direct and indirect plant defence against herbivorous arthropods , 1999 .

[56]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Costs of jasmonate‐induced responses in plants competing for limited resources , 1998 .

[57]  David C. Krakauer,et al.  Spatial structure and the evolution of honest cost-free signalling , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  Cognitive Ecology: The Evolutionary Ecology of Information Processing and Decision Making , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  S. Risch Effects of induced chemical changes on interpretation of feeding preference tests , 1985 .

[60]  M. Mescher,et al.  Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel conspecific females , 2001, Nature.