A REVIEW ON SPATIAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR EVALUATION OF PAN-SHARPENED SATELLITE IMAGERY

Abstract. Nowadays, high-resolution fused satellite imagery is widely used in multiple remote sensing applications. Although the spectral quality of pan-sharpened images plays an important role in many applications, spatial quality becomes more important in numerous cases. The high spatial quality of the fused image is essential for extraction, identification and reconstruction of significant image objects, and will result in producing high-quality large scale maps especially in the urban areas. This paper introduces the most sensitive and effective methods in detecting the spatial distortion of fused images by implementing a number of spatial quality assessment indices that are utilized in the field of remote sensing and image processing. In this regard, in order to recognize the ability of quality assessment indices for detecting the spatial distortion quantity of fused images, input images of the fusion process are affected by some intentional spatial distortions based on non-registration error. The capabilities of the investigated metrics are evaluated on four different fused images derived from Ikonos and WorldView-2 initial images. Achieved results obviously explicate that two methods namely Edge Variance Distortion and the spatial component of QNR metric called Ds are more sensitive and responsive to the imported errors.

[1]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  IKONOS Spatial Resolution and Image Interpretability Characterization , 2003 .

[2]  Firouz Abdullah Al-Wassai,et al.  A Novel Metric Approach Evaluation For The Spatial Enhancement Of Pan-Sharpened Images , 2012, ArXiv.

[3]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Comparison of Pansharpening Algorithms: Outcome of the 2006 GRS-S Data-Fusion Contest , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Nicolas H. Younan,et al.  Pansharpening and image quality interface , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[5]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  A Critical Comparison Among Pansharpening Algorithms , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Andrea Garzelli,et al.  Optimal MMSE Pan Sharpening of Very High Resolution Multispectral Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Content-based image quality assessment using semantic information and luminance differences , 2014 .

[8]  Snehmani,et al.  A comparative analysis of pansharpening techniques on QuickBird and WorldView-3 images , 2017 .

[9]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Pansharpening of remote sensing images with a matting model , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS.

[10]  Manfred Ehlers,et al.  Multi-sensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing , 2010 .

[11]  J. Zhou,et al.  A wavelet transform method to merge Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic data , 1998 .

[12]  Yun Zhang,et al.  An IHS and wavelet integrated approach to improve pan-sharpening visual quality of natural colour IKONOS and QuickBird images , 2005, Inf. Fusion.

[13]  Lina J. Karam,et al.  A No-Reference Objective Image Sharpness Metric Based on the Notion of Just Noticeable Blur (JNB) , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Gintautas Palubinskas,et al.  Joint Quality Measure for Evaluation of Pansharpening Accuracy , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Farhad Samadzadegan,et al.  Spectral and Spatial Quality assessment of IHS and Wavelet Based Pan-sharpening Techniques for High Resolution Satellite Imagery , 2018 .

[16]  Frosti Pálsson,et al.  Pansharpening and Classification of Pansharpened Images , 2013 .

[17]  Kai-Kuang Ma,et al.  ESIM: Edge Similarity for Screen Content Image Quality Assessment , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[18]  Josaphat Tetuko Sri Sumantyo,et al.  Assessment of pan-sharpening methods applied to image fusion of remotely sensed multi-band data , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[19]  2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 2004, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 20-24 September 2004 , 2004, IGARSS.

[20]  Farhad Samadzadegan,et al.  Spatial Quality Assessment of Pan-Sharpened High Resolution Satellite Imagery Based on an Automatically Estimated Edge Based Metric , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Sophia Antipolis,et al.  Assessment of the quality of fused products , 2004 .

[22]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Pixel-Level Image Fusion Using Wavelet Transform , 2012 .

[24]  A. Hegde,et al.  A Review of Quality Metrics for Fused Image , 2015 .

[25]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Wavelet based image fusion techniques — An introduction, review and comparison , 2007 .

[26]  Vps Naidu Discrete Cosine Transform-based Image Fusion , 2010 .

[27]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Pansharpening Quality Assessment using Modulation Transfer Function Filters , 2008, IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[29]  Yaoqin Xie,et al.  Applications of edge preservation ratio in image processing , 2014, 2014 12th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP).

[30]  L. Wald,et al.  Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions: Assessing the quality of resulting images , 1997 .

[31]  K. Nikolakopoulos,et al.  Quality assessment of ten fusion techniques applied on Worldview-2 , 2015 .