Does cardiac rhythm monitoring in patients with elevated troponin levels lead to changes in management?

Background: We sought to identify the frequency of arrhythmias in patients with elevated cardiac troponin levels and without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or a primary arrhythmia, and to determine whether detection of an arrhythmia leads to management changes. Methods: A review of 1381 consecutive patients admitted from the emergency department for rhythm monitoring with an elevated cardiac troponin T (cTnT) level was performed. Patients admitted to an intensive care unit and those with an initial primary arrhythmia were excluded. Troponin values were obtained on admission, at 3 hours and at 6 hours. Electronic medical records and all rhythm recordings were reviewed for documentation of an arrhythmia and any changes in management. Results: An arrhythmia was detected in 26% of the 330 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Those with arrhythmias had higher rates of coronary artery disease and prior percutaneous coronary intervention (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Those with arrhythmias had higher mean cTnT values compared to those without arrhythmias (p = 0.02 at 3 hours and p = 0.006 at 6 hours) even after controlling for a discharge diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Changes in management in response to the detection of arrhythmias were infrequent (6.3%) and usually included only changes in medication doses. Conclusions: Patients admitted with an elevated cTnT level to a non-intensive care unit rhythm-monitored bed without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or primary arrhythmia have a high incidence of arrhythmias; however, changes in management are infrequent.

[1]  P. Hoff,et al.  Evaluation of the appropriateness and outcome of in-hospital telemetry monitoring. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Preparing the United States for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  L. Meng,et al.  ARRHYTHMIA ASSOCIATED WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME: OCCURRENCE, RISK FACTORS, THERAPY AND PROGNOSIS: A SINGLE-CENTRE STUDY , 2012, Heart.

[4]  J. Alpert,et al.  How to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in acute cardiac care , 2012 .

[5]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2011, European heart journal.

[6]  M. Eckman,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of telemetry for hospitalized patients with low-risk chest pain. , 2011, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[7]  C. Çevik,et al.  SHOULD HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS WITH PNEUMONIA AND CARDIAC RISK FACTORS BE ON TELEMETRY? , 2010, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  Z. Liu,et al.  Cardiac troponin I and ventricular arrhythmia in patients with chronic heart failure , 2006, European journal of clinical investigation.

[9]  W. Aronow,et al.  Inpatient telemetry does not need to be used in the management of older patients hospitalized with chest pain at low risk for in-hospital coronary events and mortality. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[10]  R. Califf,et al.  Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young , 2004, Circulation.

[11]  G. Rajan,et al.  Cardiac troponin I as a predictor of arrhythmia and ventricular dysfunction in trauma patients with myocardial contusion. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  R. Califf,et al.  Sustained ventricular arrhythmias and mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-III trial. , 2003, American heart journal.

[13]  H. Katus,et al.  Temporal repolarization inhomogeneity and reperfusion arrhythmias in patients undergoing successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: impact of admission troponin T. , 2003, American heart journal.

[14]  A. Fein,et al.  Is telemetry monitoring necessary in low-risk suspected acute chest pain syndromes? , 2002, Chest.

[15]  C. Sivaram,et al.  Telemetry outside critical care units: Patterns of utilization and influence on management decisions , 1998, Clinical cardiology.

[16]  J. Hollander,et al.  Are monitored telemetry beds necessary for patients with nontraumatic chest pain and normal or nonspecific electrocardiograms? , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  M. Young,et al.  Role of telemetry monitoring in the non-intensive care unit. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  J. Ornato,et al.  Recommended guidelines for in-hospital cardiac monitoring of adults for detection of arrhythmia. Emergency Cardiac Care Committee members. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  M. Young,et al.  Evaluation of guidelines for the use of telemetry in the non-intensive-care setting , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[20]  J. Hollander,et al.  Lack of utility of telemetry monitoring for identification of cardiac death and life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias in low-risk patients with chest pain. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[21]  R. Mcnutt,et al.  Emergency department admissions to inpatient cardiac telemetry beds: a prospective cohort study of risk stratification and outcomes. , 2001, The American journal of medicine.