Poor readers' retrieval mechanism: efficient access is not dependent on reading skill

A substantial body of evidence points to a cue-based direct-access retrieval mechanism as a crucial component of skilled adult reading. We report two experiments aimed at examining whether poor readers are able to make use of the same retrieval mechanism. This is significant in light of findings that poor readers have difficulty retrieving linguistic information (e.g., Perfetti, 1985). Our experiments are based on a previous demonstration of direct-access retrieval in language processing, presented in McElree et al. (2003). Experiment 1 replicates the original result using an auditory implementation of the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff (SAT) method. This finding represents a significant methodological advance, as it opens up the possibility of exploring retrieval speeds in non-reading populations. Experiment 2 provides evidence that poor readers do use a direct-access retrieval mechanism during listening comprehension, despite overall poorer accuracy and slower retrieval speeds relative to skilled readers. The findings are discussed with respect to hypotheses about the source of poor reading comprehension.

[1]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Training reading fluency in dysfluent readers with high reading accuracy: Word specific effects but low transfer to untrained words , 2004, Annals of dyslexia.

[2]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[3]  F. Schmalhofer,et al.  Comprehension Skill and Word-to-Text Integration Processes , 2008 .

[4]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Finitary models of language users , 1963 .

[6]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[7]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Accessing the discourse representation during reading , 1998 .

[8]  E. Gibson The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[9]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies , 1991 .

[10]  U. Goswami,et al.  Rise time and formant transition duration in the discrimination of speech sounds: the Ba-Wa distinction in developmental dyslexia. , 2011, Developmental science.

[11]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). , 2002, Psychological review.

[12]  B. McElree,et al.  Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .

[14]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[15]  B McElree,et al.  Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[16]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Chapter 9 Toward a Comprehensive Model of Comprehension , 2009 .

[17]  M. Just,et al.  Exploring the neural dynamics underpinning individual differences in sentence comprehension. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  B. McElree,et al.  Syntactic and Thematic Processing in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence for a Temporal Dissociation , 1995 .

[19]  Eric M. Dunleavy,et al.  Literacy in Everyday Life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. NCES 2007-490. , 2007 .

[20]  U. Goswami A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  P. Reitsma,et al.  Lateral and Central Presentation of Words with Limited Exposure Duration as Remedial Training for Reading Disabled Children , 2005, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[22]  Bobby Schnabel,et al.  A modular system of algorithms for unconstrained minimization , 1985, TOMS.

[23]  M. Wolf,et al.  The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. , 1999 .

[24]  S. Vaughn,et al.  A Synthesis of Research on Effective Interventions for Building Reading Fluency with Elementary Students with Learning Disabilities , 2002, Journal of learning disabilities.

[25]  G. Vining,et al.  Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .

[26]  Brian McElree,et al.  Relationship between measures of working memory capacity and the time course of short-term memory retrieval and interference resolution. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[28]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs , 2006, Brain Research.

[29]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2003 .

[30]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Clinton L. Johns,et al.  Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension , 2014, Cognition.

[32]  R. Joshi,et al.  Vocabulary: A Critical Component of Comprehension , 2005 .

[33]  Kristen M. Tooley,et al.  Individual Differences in Eye-Movements During Reading: Working Memory and Speed-of-Processing Effects. , 2012, Journal of eye movement research.

[34]  Peter Carruthers The Nature of Working Memory , 2015 .

[35]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension , 2007 .

[36]  Brian McElree,et al.  Comprehension of Linguistic Dependencies: Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Evidence for Direct-Access Retrieval From Memory , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[37]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[38]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations , 2007 .

[40]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[41]  Gina Conti-Ramsden,et al.  Contribution of phonological and broader language skills to literacy. , 2008, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[42]  B. McElree,et al.  Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[43]  G. Waters,et al.  The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[44]  J. B. Wyman,et al.  What is reading ability , 1921 .

[45]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[46]  B. McElree,et al.  Attended and Non-Attended States in Working Memory: Accessing Categorized Structures , 1998 .

[47]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[48]  L. A. Novikova,et al.  ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF SPEECH , 1961 .

[49]  Whitney Tabor,et al.  Speaking Up for Vocabulary , 2007, Journal of learning disabilities.

[50]  P. Broek,et al.  The Landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. , 1999 .

[51]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[52]  J. Chapman,et al.  The Simple View of Reading Redux , 2012, Journal of learning disabilities.

[53]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time-course analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[54]  Julie A. Van Dyke,et al.  Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[55]  U. Goswami,et al.  Picture Naming Deficits in Developmental Dyslexia: The Phonological Representations Hypothesis , 1997, Brain and Language.

[56]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  Memory-Load Interference in Syntactic Processing , 2002, Psychological science.

[57]  L. Sprenger-Charolles,et al.  Discrimination of speech sounds by children with dyslexia: comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[58]  B. McElree,et al.  Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011 .

[59]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time — a reply , 1979 .

[60]  C. Perfetti,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of semantic and phonological processing in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders , 2007, Brain and Language.

[61]  J. V. Van Dyke Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[62]  Kevyn Collins-Thompson,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Scientific Studies of Reading Predicting Robust Vocabulary Growth from Measures of Incremental Learning , 2011 .

[63]  C. Perfetti,et al.  The lexical quality hypothesis , 2002 .

[64]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[65]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[66]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Garden Path Re-Analysis: Attach (Anyway) and Revision as Last Resort , 2000 .

[67]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[68]  Erin M. Freed,et al.  Modeling Reader and Text Interactions During Narrative Comprehension: A Test of the Lexical Quality Hypothesis , 2013, Discourse processes.

[69]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations , 1983, Prentice Hall series in computational mathematics.

[70]  Clinton L. Johns,et al.  The importance of knowledge in vivid text memory: An individual-differences investigation of recollection and familiarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[71]  A. V. Reed,et al.  List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[72]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  The diagnosis and cure of garden paths , 1994 .

[73]  Brian McElree,et al.  Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis , 1998 .

[74]  A. D. Hall,et al.  The PORT Mathematical Subroutine Library , 1978, TOMS.

[75]  Clinton L. Johns,et al.  Phonological instability in young adult poor readers: Time course measures and computational modeling , 2011 .

[76]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Priming and Retrieval from Short-Term Memory: A Speed Accuracy Trade-Off Analysis , 1980 .

[77]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach , 1986, Cognition.

[78]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[79]  Kristen M. Tooley,et al.  Lexical mediation and context effects in sentence processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[80]  Barbara J. Wendling,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. , 2009 .

[81]  J. V. Van Dyke Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[82]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The focus of attention across space and across time , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[83]  Dolores Perin,et al.  Literacy Skills Among Academically Underprepared Students , 2013 .

[84]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[85]  Gene Ouellette,et al.  A not-so-simple view of reading: how oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story , 2010 .

[86]  Donald Shankweiler,et al.  From Verbal Efficiency Theory to Lexical Quality: The Role of Memory Processes in Reading Comprehension , 2012 .

[87]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[88]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[89]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. , 1994 .

[90]  W. Kintsch The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[91]  Junle Wang,et al.  Study of depth bias of observers in free viewing of still stereoscopic synthetic stimuli , 2012 .

[92]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  Reading Differences and Brain: Cortical Integration of Speech and Print in Sentence Processing Varies With Reader Skill , 2008, Developmental neuropsychology.

[93]  M. Watkins,et al.  Buildup of Proactive Inhibition as a Cue-Overload Effect. , 1975 .

[94]  André Aleman,et al.  Toward a comprehensive model. , 2008 .

[95]  Rajarshi Dey,et al.  Phonemic Awareness Contributes to Text Reading Fluency: Evidence From Eye Movements , 2013 .

[96]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[97]  C. Clifton,et al.  Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies , 1989 .

[98]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .

[99]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[100]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[101]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Statistics in Psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards , 2004 .

[102]  Tim Smith,et al.  Sentence processing , 2004 .

[103]  B. McElree,et al.  Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking , 2004 .

[104]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[105]  Genevieve McArthur,et al.  Can verbal working memory training improve reading? , 2015, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[106]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Reading skill: some adult comparisons , 1994 .

[107]  D. Langenberg Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[108]  Chantel S Prat,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Readers vary in their use of plausibility information , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[109]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[111]  Clinton L. Johns,et al.  Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading , 2015, Reading and Writing.

[112]  Nicole J. Conrad,et al.  Training letter and orthographic pattern recognition in children with slow naming speed , 2011 .

[113]  John O. Willis,et al.  Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence , 2014 .

[114]  P. Gordon,et al.  Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[115]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[116]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[117]  U. Goswami,et al.  Phonological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia and the phonological representations hypothesis. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[118]  B. McElree,et al.  A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis , 2008 .

[119]  Arnold L. Glass,et al.  Context and distance-to-disambiguation effects in ambiguity resolution: Evidence from grammaticality judgments of garden path sentences , 1987 .

[120]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension , 1975 .

[121]  B. McElree,et al.  The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension , 1993 .

[122]  K. Stanovich Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers , 2000 .

[123]  Eva Marinus,et al.  Increasing Word-Reading Speed in Poor Readers: No Additional Benefits of Explicit Letter-Cluster Training , 2012 .

[124]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension : Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources , 2006 .

[125]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992, Psychological review.

[126]  Jonathan M. Campbell,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test , 2010 .

[127]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[128]  H. Schlosberg,et al.  Octave generalization, pitch discrimination, and loudness thresholds in the white rat. , 1943 .

[129]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Determiners: an Empirical Argument for Innateness 1 , 2022 .

[130]  Clinton L. Johns,et al.  Chapter 20 – Comprehension Ability in Mature Readers , 2006 .

[131]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[132]  G. Razran,et al.  Studies in configural conditioning. VI. Comparative extinction and forgetting of pattern and of single-stimulus conditioning. , 1939 .

[133]  J. A. Dyke Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007 .

[134]  Edward W. Wlotko,et al.  Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[135]  V. Kuperman,et al.  Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.