The selection of closed-class words in noun phrase production: The case of Dutch determiners

In three experiments we tested the predictions of two models of determiner selection in the production of Dutch noun phrases (NPs). In Experiment 1, participants named pictures using plural and unmarked determiner + noun NPs. In Experiment 2, participants named pictures using diminutive and unmarked determiner + noun NPs. In both experiments, we found that production latencies for plural and diminutive NPs relative to their unmarked baselines were affected by the gender of the base noun even though this feature of nouns is logically unnecessary in the selection of determiners in these types of NPs. In Experiment 3, we replicated the findings of Experiments 1, and generalized the observed pattern of results to a new condition: plural-diminutive NPs. This pattern of results, showing that the gender of the base noun is visible to the determiner selection process even when this information is logically superfluous, finds a ready explanation in frame-based models of determiner selection and is inconsistent with hierarchical models of determiner selection.

[1]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[2]  M Turennout,et al.  Brain activity during speaking: from syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. , 1998, Science.

[3]  A. Ellis.  Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .

[4]  A Caramazza,et al.  The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  A. Caramazza.  How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[6]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The production of determiners: evidence from French , 2002, Cognition.

[7]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[8]  Albert Costa,et al.  The Gender Congruity Effect: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan , 1999 .

[9]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[10]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: the gender interference effect in German. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  M. Garrett.  Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[12]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch , 2003 .

[13]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  M. S. Miron,et al.  A cross-linguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[15]  F.-Xavier Alario,et al.  A cross-linguistic investigation of determiner production , 2001 .

[16]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[17]  W. La Heij,et al.  The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks , 1998 .

[18]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[19]  J J van Berkum,et al.  Syntactic processes in speech production: the retrieval of grammatical gender. , 1997, Cognition.

[20]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[21]  H. Schriefers.  Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases , 1993 .

[22]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Determiner selection in noun phrase production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.