The effect of binding on the subharmonic emissions from individual lipid-encapsulated microbubbles at transmit frequencies of 11 and 25 MHz.

Targeted microbubble imaging at ultrasound frequencies above 5 MHz has applications in both a preclinical context for a range of disease processes and clinically for the assessment of atherosclerosis and superficial tumors. Although the feasibility of ultrasound molecular imaging has been well demonstrated for a range of target molecules, little work has examined the effects of binding on microbubble oscillations, which is of potential relevance to improving the sensitivity, specificity, and quantification of bound-bubble detection. In this study we investigated the influence of binding on the subharmonic response of bubbles at transmit frequencies of 11 and 25 MHz. Individual bubbles were situated adjacent to a boundary in either a bound or an unbound state, optically sized and acoustically interrogated with pressures ranging from 0.02 to 1.2 MPa. At 11 MHz, unbound bubbles (n = 53) were found to have strong subharmonic activity for sizes between 2.4 and 2.6 μm, whereas bound bubbles (n = 50) were most active from 2.6 to 3.0 μm. Destruction thresholds were found to be lower for bound bubbles. At 25 MHz, bound-bubble (n = 57) activity was found to peak at 1.9 μm as compared to 2.1 μm in the unbound cases (n = 53), with a 20% increase in amplitude. Comparison with simulations indicates that both unbound and bound bubbles undergo compression-only behavior at 11 MHz, and expansion-dominated behavior at 25 MHz. Subharmonic emissions elicited from 0 radian transmit pulses were found to be π/2 radians out of phase with those elicited from a π radian transmit pulse, suggesting inefficient subharmonic preservation from pulse inversion schemes. With the appropriate postprocessed phase correction, an increase in the subharmonic amplitude of up to 60% was shown, depending on the bubble size and transmit frequency.

[1]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection With Microbubbles Targeted to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 , 2003, Circulation.

[2]  F. Stuart Foster,et al.  Microultrasound Molecular Imaging of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 in a Mouse Model of Tumor Angiogenesis , 2007, Molecular imaging.

[3]  A. Needles,et al.  High-frequency, nonlinear flow imaging of microbubble contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  R. Krams,et al.  Vasa vasorum and molecular imaging of atherosclerotic plaques using nonlinear contrast intravascular ultrasound , 2007, Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation.

[5]  N. de Jong,et al.  P2A-3 High Frequency Attenuation and Size Distribution Measurements of Definity and Manipulated Definity Populations , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[6]  A. Katiyar,et al.  Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles. , 2009, Ultrasonics.

[8]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Acoustic response from adherent targeted contrast agents. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Koen D Reesink,et al.  Critical appraisal of targeted ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging in large arteries. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Preparation of targeted microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[12]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Higher order nonlinear ultrasonic imaging , 1999, 1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. International Symposium (Cat. No.99CH37027).

[13]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonspherical oscillations of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Jiri Sklenar,et al.  Imaging tumor angiogenesis with contrast ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)beta3. , 2003, Circulation.

[15]  B. Helfield,et al.  Scaling of viscoelastic shell properties of lipid encapsulated microbubbles with frequency. , 2010 .

[16]  Rolf A. Brekken,et al.  Monitoring Response to Anticancer Therapy by Targeting Microbubbles to Tumor Vasculature , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  Matthew Bruce,et al.  A generalization of pulse inversion Doppler , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[18]  F. Foster,et al.  A method for differentiating targeted microbubbles in real time using subharmonic micro-ultrasound and interframe filtering. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  K W Ferrara,et al.  Selective imaging of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Charles T. Lancée,et al.  Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part one: simulations , 1994 .

[21]  J. Willmann,et al.  Ultrasound Molecular Imaging Contrast Agent Binding to Both E- and P-Selectin in Different Species , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[22]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Combined optical and acoustical detection of single microbubble dynamics. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Emmanuel Chérin,et al.  Nonlinear emission from individual bound microbubbles at high frequencies. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  K. Ley,et al.  Ultrasound Assessment of Inflammation and Renal Tissue Injury With Microbubbles Targeted to P-Selectin , 2001, Circulation.

[25]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Characterizing the subharmonic response of phospholipid-coated microbubbles for carotid imaging. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  E. Chérin,et al.  Investigating the subharmonic response of individual phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies: a comparative study of five agents. , 2012, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[27]  François Tranquart,et al.  Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of VEGFR2 in a Rat Prostate Tumor Model Using BR55 , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[28]  P. Burns,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[29]  J. Lindner,et al.  Molecular Imaging of Inflammation in Atherosclerosis With Targeted Ultrasound Detection of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 , 2007, Circulation.

[30]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging , 2004 .

[31]  F Forsberg,et al.  Subharmonic imaging of contrast agents. , 2000, Ultrasonics.

[32]  L. Masotti,et al.  Subharmonic emissions from microbubbles: effect of the driving pulse shape , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[33]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Asymmetric oscillation of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents. , 2005, Applied physics letters.

[34]  Nico de Jong,et al.  "Compression-only" behavior of phospholipid-coated contrast bubbles. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[35]  M. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  Monopole emission of sound by asymmetric bubble oscillations. Part 1. Normal modes , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[36]  P M Shankar,et al.  Subharmonic backscattering from ultrasound contrast agents. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Isabelle Tardy,et al.  BR55: A Lipopeptide-Based VEGFR2-Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Agent for Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[38]  S. Kaul,et al.  Molecular imaging with contrast enhanced ultrasound , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[39]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Insonation of Targeted Microbubbles Produces Regions of Reduced Blood Flow Within Tumor Vasculature , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[40]  A. Kabalnov,et al.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 1. Theory. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[41]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonspherical shape oscillations of coated microbubbles in contact with a wall. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[43]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial elasticity model. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  John A Hossack,et al.  Enhanced targeting of ultrasound contrast agents using acoustic radiation force. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[45]  Andrej Lyshchik,et al.  Relationship Between Retention of a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2)‐Targeted Ultrasonographic Contrast Agent and the Level of VEGFR2 Expression in an In Vivo Breast Cancer Model , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[46]  J. Willmann,et al.  Molecular ultrasound imaging: current status and future directions. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[47]  Jonathan R Lindner,et al.  Molecular imaging with contrast ultrasound and targeted microbubbles , 2004, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[48]  Kumar Sharma,et al.  Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis With an Integrin Targeted Microbubble Contrast Agent , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[49]  A. Needles,et al.  High frequency nonlinear B-scan imaging of microbubble contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[50]  J. M. T. Thompson,et al.  Subharmonic Resonances and Chaotic Motions of a Bilinear Oscillator , 1983 .

[51]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture , 2005 .

[52]  S Otto,et al.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 2. Experiment. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[53]  N de Jong,et al.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[54]  P. Rafter,et al.  Means for increasing sensitivity in non-linear ultrasound imaging systems , 1997 .

[55]  M Arditi,et al.  Nonlinear contrast imaging with an array-based micro-ultrasound system. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[56]  D. Lohse,et al.  Dynamics of coated microbubbles adherent to a wall. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[57]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[58]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis With Contrast Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v&bgr;3 , 2003 .