Learning deep similarity metric for 3D MR–TRUS image registration

PurposeThe fusion of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and magnetic resonance (MR) images for guiding targeted prostate biopsy has significantly improved the biopsy yield of aggressive cancers. A key component of MR–TRUS fusion is image registration. However, it is very challenging to obtain a robust automatic MR–TRUS registration due to the large appearance difference between the two imaging modalities. The work presented in this paper aims to tackle this problem by addressing two challenges: (i) the definition of a suitable similarity metric and (ii) the determination of a suitable optimization strategy.MethodsThis work proposes the use of a deep convolutional neural network to learn a similarity metric for MR–TRUS registration. We also use a composite optimization strategy that explores the solution space in order to search for a suitable initialization for the second-order optimization of the learned metric. Further, a multi-pass approach is used in order to smooth the metric for optimization.ResultsThe learned similarity metric outperforms the classical mutual information and also the state-of-the-art MIND feature-based methods. The results indicate that the overall registration framework has a large capture range. The proposed deep similarity metric-based approach obtained a mean TRE of 3.86 mm (with an initial TRE of 16 mm) for this challenging problem.ConclusionA similarity metric that is learned using a deep neural network can be used to assess the quality of any given image registration and can be used in conjunction with the aforementioned optimization framework to perform automatic registration that is robust to poor initialization.

[1]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Kemal Tuncali,et al.  Open-source image registration for MRI–TRUS fusion-guided prostate interventions , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[3]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.

[4]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[5]  T. Jayasree,et al.  Improved medical image fusion based on cascaded PCA and shift invariant wavelet transforms , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[6]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2018 , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Multimodal image-guided prostate fusion biopsy based on automatic deformable registration , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[8]  Uwe Kruger,et al.  Learning Deep Similarity Metric for 3D MR-TRUS Registration , 2018, ArXiv.

[9]  Rebecca L. Siegel Mph,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2018 , 2018 .

[10]  Michael R Hamblin,et al.  CA : A Cancer Journal for Clinicians , 2011 .

[11]  Nikos Komodakis,et al.  Learning to compare image patches via convolutional neural networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[12]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Biomechanically Constrained Surface Registration: Application to MR-TRUS Fusion for Prostate Interventions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[14]  Roger Fletcher,et al.  A Rapidly Convergent Descent Method for Minimization , 1963, Comput. J..

[15]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Three-Dimensional Nonrigid MR-TRUS Registration Using Dual Optimization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Andras Lasso,et al.  Validation of MRI to TRUS registration for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. , 2018, Brachytherapy.

[17]  P Choyke,et al.  Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve , 2017, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[18]  Nikos Komodakis,et al.  A Deep Metric for Multimodal Registration , 2016, MICCAI.

[19]  Pingkun Yan,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[20]  Dean C. Barratt,et al.  Fully automated prostate magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion via a probabilistic registration metric , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[21]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[22]  Michael Brady,et al.  MIND: Modality independent neighbourhood descriptor for multi-modal deformable registration , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[23]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[24]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[25]  D. Shanno Conditioning of Quasi-Newton Methods for Function Minimization , 1970 .

[26]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[27]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Automatic ultrasound-MRI registration for neurosurgery using the 2D and 3D LC2 Metric , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Efficient Convex Optimization Approach to 3D Non-rigid MR-TRUS Registration , 2013, MICCAI.

[29]  Li Zhang,et al.  Deep similarity learning for multimodal medical images , 2018, Comput. methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis..

[30]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.