Science–technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents

Abstract Many regions of the European Union with a high degree of autonomy have elected very clearly to stimulate scientific research and technological development (R&D) as a specific means of promoting economic growth and the welfare of their citizens. In Spain, several autonomous regions have organised their efforts in science and technology by means of the adoption of regional R&D plans. In some cases, particular concern is taken to link the scope of scientific research with that of technology, but even in these few cases, it is acknowledged that little is known of the mechanisms by which the results of scientific research are translated into technological development, and how this latter in turn influences the objectives of scientific research. Our aim in this article is to study in greater depth the relationship between science and technological development in the various regions of Spain. The methodology that we apply to investigate the links between science and technology is based on an analysis of scientific citations in patent documents (non-patent citation (NPC)). The results obtained from this study provide some relevant data on the interconnection between the scientific and technological systems from a regional perspective.

[1]  F. Tödtling.  Regional Differences and Determinants of Entrepreneurial Innovation — Empirical Results of an Austrian Case Study , 1990 .

[2]  P. Collins,et al.  Citations in patents to the basic research literature , 1988 .

[3]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[4]  Björn Asheim,et al.  Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’. A condition for prosperity? , 1996 .

[5]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations , 1998 .

[6]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[7]  Michael Stolpe,et al.  Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology , 2002 .

[8]  Denis Maillat,et al.  Interactions between urban systems and localized productive systems: An approach to endogenous regional development in terms of innovative milieu , 1998 .

[9]  Philippe Aydalot,et al.  High Technology Industry and Innovative Environments: The European Experience , 1988 .

[10]  J. Ziman.  Pipers and Tunes in Science. (Book Reviews: Prometheus Bound. Science in a Dynamic Steady State.) , 2005 .

[11]  Benoît Godin,et al.  Research and the practice of publication in industries , 1996 .

[12]  Rolf Sternberg,et al.  Munich as Germany's No. 1 High Technology Region: Empirical Evidence, Theoretical Explanations and the Role of Small Firm/Large Firm Relationships , 1999 .

[13]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[14]  Manuel Castells,et al.  Technopoles of the World: The Making of Twenty-First-Century Industrial Complexes , 1994 .

[15]  Eric James Iversen.  A patent share and citation analysis of knowledge bases and interactions in the Norwegian innovation system , 1999 .

[16]  R. Nelson,et al.  Factors behind cross-industry differences in technical progress , 1997 .

[17]  Edward M. Bergman,et al.  Regions Reconsidered: Economic Networks, Innovation, and Local Development in Industrialized Countries , 1991 .

[18]  M. Meyer.  Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .

[19]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  Linkage between agency-supported research and patented industrial technology , 1995 .

[20]  C. Lawson,et al.  Towards a competence theory of the region , 1999 .

[21]  L. Leydesdorff.  The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations , 2000 .

[22]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Exploring the science and technology interface: inventor-author relations in laser medicine research , 1994 .

[23]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[24]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Perceptions of Scientification of Innovation as Measured by Referencing Between Patents and Papers: Dynamics in Science-Based Fields of Technology , 1992 .

[25]  Mark P. Carpenter,et al.  Linkage Between Basic Research Literature and Patents , 1980 .

[26]  Erik Stam,et al.  Clusters of High Technology SMEs: The Dutch Case , 1999 .

[27]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Technological Relevance of Science: An Assessment of Citation Linkages between Patents and Research Papers , 2000, Scientometrics.

[28]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[29]  Paul Krugman,et al.  Development, Geography, and Economic Theory , 1995 .

[30]  R. Tijssen.  Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows , 2001 .

[31]  A. Bramanti,et al.  The Dynamics of Innovative Regions , 1996 .

[32]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[33]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems : the role of governances in a globalized world , 1998 .

[34]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems , 2002, Scientometrics.

[35]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[36]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Patent Citations in a Novel Field of Technology — What Can They Tell about Interactions between Emerging Communities of Science and Technology? , 2000, Scientometrics.

[37]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity , 1999 .

[38]  M. Storper.  Regional ‘Worlds’ of Production: Learning and Innovation in the Technology Districts of France, Italy and the USA , 1993 .

[39]  Attila Varga,et al.  University Research and Regional Innovation: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Academic Technology Transfers , 1998 .

[40]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[41]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The Learning Economy , 1994 .

[42]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[43]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[44]  K. Morgan.  The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[45]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[46]  R. Tijssen.  Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their inventors , 2002 .

[47]  Attila Varga,et al.  Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities , 2000 .

[48]  Ann Markusen,et al.  High-Tech America: The What, How, Where, and Why of the Sunrise Industries , 1987 .

[49]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[50]  R. Camagni.  Innovation Networks , 1991 .

[51]  M. Storper.  The Limits to Globalization: Technology Districts and International Trade , 1992 .

[52]  Francis Narin,et al.  Status report: Linkage between technology and science , 1992 .

[53]  James Simme,et al.  Innovation Networks and Learning Regions , 2003 .

[54]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[55]  M. Fung,et al.  Measuring the intensity of knowledge flow with patent statistics , 2002 .

[56]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes , 2004, Scientometrics.

[57]  Francis Narin,et al.  Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence , 1983 .

[58]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[59]  M. Storper.  The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later , 1995 .

[60]  M. Bell,et al.  Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries , 1993 .

[61]  Raffaele Paci,et al.  Technological Enclaves and Industrial Districts: An Analysis of the Regional Distribution of Innovative Activity in Europe , 1997 .

[62]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  An exploration of the science base of recent technology , 1990 .

[63]  P. Cooke,et al.  Structural Competitiveness and Learning Regions , 2000 .

[64]  David L. Deeds,et al.  An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology , 2000 .

[65]  M. Storper.  The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[66]  K. Pavitt.  SPRU Electronic Working Paper No 5 The Social Shaping of the National Science Base , 1998 .

[67]  E. Malecki.  Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Competitiveness , 1997 .

[68]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[69]  R. Nelson.  National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[70]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  The economics of innovation , 1985 .

[71]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and Productivity: The Unfinished Business , 1998 .

[72]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[73]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy , 1998 .

[74]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Regions in a global market: the experiences of Wales and Baden-Wurttemberg , 1997 .

[75]  Martin Meyer,et al.  What is Special about Patent Citations? Differences between Scientific and Patent Citations , 2000, Scientometrics.

[76]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .