The Politeness of Requests Made Via Email and Voicemail: Support for the Hyperpersonal Model

This study analyzes requests made via email and voicemail for properties of politeness (Brown & Levinson, 1987). Voicemail users have less control over planning, composing, editing, and executing messages, and must manage more nonverbal cues than email users. Thus, it is predicted that email will enable users to create more polite speech than voicemail. A 2 (communication medium: email or voicemail) x 2 (imposition: low or high) factorial design was implemented to test this hypothesis. One hundred fifty-one participants created request messages that were subsequently analyzed for properties of politeness. Overall, the results indicate email requests were more polite than voicemail requests. These results are consistent with the hyperpersonal model (Walther, 1996).

[1]  Carlos G. Aleman,et al.  Identity Implications of Influence Goals: A Revised Analysis of Face-Threatening Acts and Application to Seeking Compliance with Same-Sex Friends. , 1998 .

[2]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[3]  Rosalie J. Ocker,et al.  Politeness theory and computer-mediated communication: a sociolinguistic approach to analyzing relational messages , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[4]  J. Walther.  Group and Interpersonal Effects in International Computer-Mediated Collaboration , 1997 .

[5]  P. Brown,et al.  Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena , 1978 .

[6]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[7]  A. E. Lindsey,et al.  Encoding Processes in the Production of Multiple-Goal Messages. , 1989 .

[8]  Robert T. Craig,et al.  The discourse of requests assessment of a politeness approach , 1986 .

[9]  Jasook Koo,et al.  More than words: Linguistic and nonlinguistic politeness in two cultures. , 1996 .

[10]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies , 1989, Language in Society.

[11]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[12]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Straight Talk: Delivering Bad News through Electronic Communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  E. Goffman.  On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. , 1955, Psychiatry.

[14]  Andrea Chester,et al.  Online Teaching: Encouraging Collaboration through Anonymity , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Computer-mediated communication on the internet , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  T. Thompson,et al.  Is it a matter of politeness?: Face and the effectiveness of messages about condom use , 2004 .

[17]  F. Lee,et al.  Being Polite and Keeping MUM: How Bad News is Communicated in Organizational Hierarchies1 , 1993 .

[18]  Fiona Lee.  Verbal Strategies for Seeking Help in Organizations1 , 1999 .

[19]  Greg Leichty,et al.  Social‐Cognitive and Situational Influences on the Use of Face‐Saving Persuasive Strategies , 1991 .

[20]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[21]  Joong-nam Yang,et al.  Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: general principles and differences due to culture and gender. , 1992 .

[22]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[23]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? , 2001, Commun. Res..