‘The way you talk, do I have a choice?’ Patient narratives of medication decision-making during hospitalization

ABSTRACT Objective Based on the principle of the autonomy of the patient, shared decision-making (SDM) is the ideal approach in clinical encounters. In SDM, patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) share knowledge and power when faced with the task of making decisions. However, patients are often not involved in the decision-making process. In this study, we explore medication decision-making during hospitalization and how power in the specific patient—HCP relationship is articulated, as analysed by Foucauldian theory. Methods A qualitative case study, comprising observations of patient-HCP encounters at an internal medicines ward at a university hospital in Norway, followed by semi-structured interviews. The narratives (n = 4 patients) were selected from a larger study (n = 15 patients). The rationale behind the choice of these patients was to include diverse and rich accounts. The four patients in their 40s–70s were included close to the day of presumed discharge. Results The narratives provide an insight into the patients as persons, their perspectives, including what mattered to them during their hospitalization, especially in relation to medications. Overall, SDM was not observed in this study. Even though all the participants actively tried to keep their autonomous capacity and to resist the HCPs’ use of power, they were not able to change the established dynamics. Moreover, they were not allowed an equal voice to those of HCPs and thus not to escape the system’s objectification and subjectification of them. Conclusion There is a need for HCPs to get more familiarized with SDM. The healthcare system and the individual HCP need to make more room for dialogue with the patients about their preferences. A part of this is also how health care systems are structured and scheduled, thus, it is important to empower patients and HCPs alike.

[1]  M. Mowé,et al.  Health literacy in medication communication during hospital discharge: a qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway , 2022, BMJ Open.

[2]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review. , 2022, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  N. Rodondi,et al.  Experience of hospital-initiated medication changes in older people with multimorbidity: a multicentre mixed-methods study embedded in the OPtimising thERapy to prevent Avoidable hospital admissions in Multimorbid older people (OPERAM) trial , 2022, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[4]  K. Svensberg,et al.  The observer effect in a hospital setting - Experiences from the observed and the observers. , 2021, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[5]  M. Mowé,et al.  Empowering the patient? Medication communication during hospital discharge: a qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway , 2021, BMJ Open.

[6]  M. Mowé,et al.  Discharge processes and medicines communication from the patient perspective: A qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway , 2021, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[7]  E. Skovlund,et al.  Effect of medicines management versus standard care on readmissions in multimorbid patients: a randomised controlled trial , 2020, BMJ Open.

[8]  P. Leavy.  The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2020 .

[9]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review , 2019, BMJ Open.

[10]  E. Manias,et al.  Patient engagement in admission and discharge medication communication: A systematic mixed studies review. , 2019, International journal of nursing studies.

[11]  A. Bergland,et al.  Older persons’ experiences of adapting to daily life at home after hospital discharge: a qualitative metasummary , 2019, BMC Health Services Research.

[12]  J. Papy.  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition) , 2019 .

[13]  K. Braun,et al.  Patient empowerment: A critique of individualism and systematic review of patient perspectives. , 2018, Patient education and counseling.

[14]  H. Agerskov,et al.  A Ricoeur-Inspired Approach to Interpret Participant Observations and Interviews , 2018, Global qualitative nursing research.

[15]  A. Spaulding,et al.  Patient Perception of Medication Communications in the Hospital: The Role of the Pharmacist , 2018, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[16]  J. Tomlinson.  Shifting the focus of shared decision making to human relationships , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[17]  M. Ekstedt,et al.  Planning for the Discharge, not for Patient Self-Management at Home – An Observational and Interview Study of Hospital Discharge , 2017, International journal of integrated care.

[18]  Martin Härter,et al.  A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[19]  K. Malterud,et al.  Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies , 2016, Qualitative health research.

[20]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Shared decision-making as an existential journey: Aiming for restored autonomous capacity. , 2016, Patient education and counseling.

[21]  Nasim Afsar-manesh,et al.  From discharge to readmission: Understanding the process from the patient perspective. , 2016, Journal of hospital medicine.

[22]  N. Maharaj.  Using field notes to facilitate critical reflection , 2016 .

[23]  Sara K Geale,et al.  The power of story: Narrative inquiry as a methodology in nursing research , 2015 .

[24]  Arthur P. Bochner,et al.  Practicing Narrative Inquiry , 2014 .

[25]  J. Goslings,et al.  Which Reasons Do Doctors, Nurses, and Patients Have for Hospital Discharge? A Mixed-Methods Study , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. , 2014, Patient education and counseling.

[27]  K. Aase,et al.  Quality and safety in transitional care of the elderly: the study protocol of a case study research design (phase 1) , 2013, BMJ Open.

[28]  Claudia C. Beal.  Keeping the story together: a holistic approach to narrative analysis , 2013 .

[29]  Gijs Hesselink,et al.  The key actor: a qualitative study of patient participation in the handover process in Europe , 2012, BMJ quality & safety.

[30]  R. Thomson,et al.  Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[31]  J. Waring.  Adaptive regulation or governmentality: patient safety and the changing regulation of medicine. , 2007, Sociology of health & illness.

[32]  Teresa Brannick,et al.  In Defense of Being “Native”: The Case for Insider Academic Research , 2007 .

[33]  T. Moen,et al.  Reflections on the Narrative Research Approach , 2006 .

[34]  M. Dimatteo,et al.  Preferences for medical collaboration: patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[35]  J. F. Caron-Flinterman,et al.  The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[36]  B. Lo,et al.  Patient-centered communication , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[37]  K. Ryan,et al.  (8) The work of Michel Foucault: relevance to pharmacy practice , 2004 .

[38]  K. Malterud.  Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning — en innføring, 2.utg , 2003 .

[39]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Client Narratives: A Theoretical Perspective , 2003, Issues in mental health nursing.

[40]  Jo Anne Ollerenshaw,et al.  Narrative Research: A Comparison of Two Restorying Data Analysis Approaches , 2002 .

[41]  T. Abma.  Emerging Narrative Forms of Knowledge Representation in the Health Sciences: Two Texts in a Postmodern Context , 2002, Qualitative health research.

[42]  R. Epstein,et al.  The science of patient-centered care. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[43]  C. Emslie,et al.  The 'doctor' or the 'girl from the University'? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. , 2000, Family practice.

[44]  I. Chalmers,et al.  People are “participants” in research , 1999, BMJ.

[45]  T. Rudge,et al.  The panopticon re-visited?: an exploration of the social and political dimensions of contemporary health care and nursing practice. , 1994, International journal of nursing studies.

[46]  M. DeVault,et al.  Narrative analysis , 1994, Language Teaching.

[47]  F. Michael Connelly,et al.  Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry , 1990 .

[48]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Shared decision making: Physicians' preferred role, usual role and their perception of its key components. , 2019, Patient education and counseling.

[49]  Christina Fogtmann Fosgerau.  Forståelsens psykologi: mentalisering i teori og praksis , 2014 .

[50]  Bălan Sergiu,et al.  M. FOUCAULT'S VIEW ON POWER RELATIONS , 2010 .

[51]  C. Allen,et al.  Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy: a dynamic reference work , 2001, JCDL '01.

[52]  K. Heggen,et al.  Omsorgsmakt. Relasjonsnære sonderinger mellom makt og avmakt , 2006 .

[53]  K. Heller.  Power, subjectification and resistance in Foucault , 1996 .

[54]  D. Polkinghorne.  Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis , 1995 .

[55]  Edith Kurzweil.  Michel foucault , 1977 .

[56]  The Humanities , 2022, What Are the Humanities For?.