An Integrated Page Ranking Algorithm for Personalized Web Search

Today search engines constitute the most powerful tools for organizing and extracting information from the Web. However, it is not uncommon that even the most renowned search engines return result sets including many pages that are definitely useless for the user. This is mainly due to the fact that the very basic relevance criterions underlying their information retrieval strategies rely on the presence of query keywords within the returned pages. Web Search Personalization is a process of customizing the Web search experience of individual users. The goal of such personalization may range from simply providing the user with a more satisfied results by relevant information. Such a system must be able to deduce the information needs of the user. It is worth observing that statistical algorithms are applied to ―tune‖ the result and, more importantly, approaches based on the concept of relevance feedback are used in order to maximize the satisfaction of user’s needs. Nevertheless, in some cases, this is not sufficient. In this paper search results are ranked based on user preferences in content and link. The preference of content and link is integrated in order to rank the results.

[1]  Michael R. Lyu,et al.  DiffusionRank: a possible penicillin for web spamming , 2007, SIGIR.

[2]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  SemRank: ranking complex relationship search results on the semantic web , 2005, WWW '05.

[3]  Dunja Mladenic,et al.  Text-learning and related intelligent agents: a survey , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[4]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  Query Expansion by Mining User Logs , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[5]  Clement T. Yu,et al.  Personalized Web search for improving retrieval effectiveness , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[6]  Marco Furini,et al.  International Journal of Computer and Applications , 2010 .

[7]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Context-Aware Semantic Association Ranking , 2003, SWDB.

[8]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Information Extraction , 2005, ACM Queue.

[9]  Dan Klein,et al.  Evaluating strategies for similarity search on the web , 2002, WWW '02.

[10]  Ming-Hsiang Su,et al.  Personalizing information services on wired and wireless networks , 2004, IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service, 2004. EEE '04. 2004.

[11]  Alessandro Micarelli,et al.  User Profiles for Personalized Information Access , 2007, The Adaptive Web.

[12]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Comparison of Two ``Document Similarity Search Engines'' , 1998 .

[13]  Oren Kurland,et al.  PageRank without hyperlinks: structural re-ranking using links induced by language models , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[14]  MladenicDunja Text-Learning and Related Intelligent Agents , 1999 .

[15]  F. Lamberti,et al.  A Relation-Based Page Rank Algorithm for Semantic Web Search Engines , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[16]  Mika Klemettinen,et al.  Finding Co-occurring Text Phrases by Combining Sequence and Frequent Set Discovery , 2007 .

[17]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Preface to Special Issue on User Modeling for Web Information Retrieval , 2004, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[18]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  Personalization of search engine services for effective retrieval and knowledge management , 2000, ICIS.

[19]  Prabhakar Raghavan,et al.  Mining the Link Structure of the World Wide Web , 1998 .

[20]  Till Biskup,et al.  Author Profile , 2013 .

[21]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..