Characterizing urban landscapes using fuzzy sets

Abstract Characterizing urban landscapes is important given the present and future projections of global population that favor urban growth. The definition of “urban” on a thematic map has proven to be problematic since urban areas are heterogeneous in terms of land use and land cover. Further, certain urban classes are inherently imprecise due to the difficulty in integrating various social and environmental inputs into a precise definition. Social components often include demographic patterns, transportation, building type and density while ecological components include soils, elevation, hydrology, climate, vegetation and tree cover. In this paper, we adopt a coupled human and natural system (CHANS) integrated scientific framework for characterizing urban landscapes. We implement the framework by adopting a fuzzy sets concept of “urban characterization” since fuzzy sets relate to classes of object with imprecise boundaries in which membership is a matter of degree. For dynamic mapping applications, user-defined classification schemes involving rules combining different social and ecological inputs can lead to a degree of quantification in class labeling varying from “highly urban” to “least urban”. A socio-economic perspective of urban may include threshold values for population and road network density while a more ecological perspective of urban may utilize the ratio of natural versus built area and percent forest cover. Threshold values are defined to derive the fuzzy rules of membership, in each case, and various combinations of rules offer a greater flexibility to characterize the many facets of the urban landscape. We illustrate the flexibility and utility of this fuzzy inference approach called the Fuzzy Urban Index for the Boston Metro region with five inputs and eighteen rules. The resulting classification map shows levels of fuzzy membership ranging from highly urban to least urban or rural in the Boston study region. We validate our approach using two experts assessing accuracy of the resulting fuzzy urban map. We discuss how our approach can be applied in other urban contexts with newly emerging descriptors of urban sustainability, urban ecology and urban metabolism.

[1]  S. Pickett,et al.  Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms , 2004 .

[2]  A. Troy,et al.  Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  T. Oke,et al.  Local Climate Zones for Urban Temperature Studies , 2012 .

[4]  Graciela Metternicht,et al.  The Performance of Fuzzy Operators on Fuzzy Classification of Urban Land Covers , 2005 .

[5]  M. Ramsey,et al.  Monitoring urban land cover change: An expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers , 2001 .

[6]  Qingming Zhan,et al.  Urban land use classes with fuzzy membership and classification based on integration of remote sensing and GIS , 2000 .

[7]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  S. Pickett,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification , 2007 .

[9]  Qihao Weng,et al.  Using Landsat ETM+ Imagery to Measure Population Density in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA , 2005 .

[10]  Ruth S. DeFries,et al.  Land Use Change and Biodiversity , 2012 .

[11]  Fernando M. Ramos,et al.  Classification of Land Use and Land Cover in the Brazilian Amazon using Fuzzy Multilayer Perceptrons , 2015, Int. J. Nat. Comput. Res..

[12]  E. Heikkila,et al.  Fuzzy Urban Sets: Theory and Application to Desakota Regions in China , 2003 .

[13]  Henri Lefebvre The Urban Revolution , 2003 .

[14]  Tim Gulden,et al.  The Rise of the Mega-Region , 2008 .

[15]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .

[16]  Saskia Sassen,et al.  New frontiers facing urban sociology at the Millennium , 2000 .

[17]  A. Roy The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory , 2009 .

[18]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Diurnal Patterns of Social Group Distributions in a Canadian City , 1983 .

[19]  Benjamin Burkhard,et al.  An ecosystem based framework to link landscape structures, functions and services , 2007 .

[20]  Jay S. Kaufman,et al.  Defining Urban and Rural Areas in U.S. Epidemiologic Studies , 2006, Journal of Urban Health.

[21]  L. Hutyra,et al.  Inconsistent definitions of "urban" result in different conclusions about the size of urban carbon and nitrogen stocks. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  R. Myneni,et al.  The interpretation of spectral vegetation indexes , 1995 .

[23]  M. Alberti,et al.  Quantifying the urban gradient: Linking urban planning and ecology , 2001 .

[24]  Michael S. Bronzini Relationships between land use and freight and commercial Truck traffic in metropolitan areas , 2012 .

[25]  Compton J. Tucker,et al.  The use of multisource satellite and geospatial data to study the effect of urbanization on primary productivity in the United States , 2013, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[26]  C. Kennedy,et al.  The Changing Metabolism of Cities , 2007 .

[27]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change , 2005, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[28]  Brendan Gleeson,et al.  Urban Planning and Human Geography , 2009 .

[29]  Jinmu Choi,et al.  System Integration of GIS and a Rule-Based Expert System for Urban Mapping , 2004 .

[30]  R. Hutchinson,et al.  Encyclopedia of urban studies , 2010 .

[31]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Fuzzy sets and systems ' . Theory and applications , 2007 .

[32]  Daniel A. Badoe,et al.  Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling , 2000 .

[33]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Fully-fuzzy supervised classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery: Statistical and artificial neural network approaches , 2001 .

[34]  J. Whitehand,et al.  Twentieth-Century Suburbs: A Morphological Approach , 2001 .

[35]  Robert E. Wolfe,et al.  A Landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990-2000 , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[36]  Curt H. Davis,et al.  A combined fuzzy pixel-based and object-based approach for classification of high-resolution multispectral data over urban areas , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[37]  F. Lindsay,et al.  Dynamics of urban growth in the Washington DC metropolitan area, 1973-1996, from Landsat observations , 2000 .

[38]  M. Alberti,et al.  Modeling the Urban Ecosystem: A Conceptual Framework , 1999 .

[39]  Michael Batty,et al.  The Structure and Form of Urban Settlements , 2010 .

[40]  Suzana Dragicevic,et al.  Fuzzy Sets for Representing the Spatial and Temporal Dimensions in GIS Databases , 2004 .

[41]  T. Ross Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[42]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets , 1994 .

[43]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[44]  P. Hall,et al.  Urban and Regional Planning , 2019 .

[45]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Beyond Urban Legends: An Emerging Framework of Urban Ecology, as Illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study , 2008 .

[46]  Jianguo Wu Urban ecology and sustainability: The state-of-the-science and future directions , 2014 .

[47]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[48]  Isam Kaysi,et al.  Identifying urban boundaries: application of remote sensing and geographic information system technologies , 2003 .

[49]  T. Peterson,et al.  An integrated approach to improving fossil fuel emissions scenarios with urban ecosystem studies , 2009 .

[50]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Classification of remote sensing images from urban areas using a fuzzy possibilistic model , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[51]  L. Frank,et al.  Linking land use with household vehicle emissions in the central puget sound: methodological framework and findings , 2000 .

[52]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  Globalization and the Rise of City-regions , 2001 .

[53]  Toby N. Carlson,et al.  The impact of land use — land cover changes due to urbanization on surface microclimate and hydrology: a satellite perspective , 2000 .

[54]  P. Knox,et al.  Urbanization: An Introduction to Urban Geography , 1993 .

[55]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  Green Cities of Europe: Global Lessons on Green Urbanism , 2012 .

[56]  W. Stefanov,et al.  Expert system classification of urban land use/cover for Delhi, India , 2008 .

[57]  Yan Song,et al.  Quantitative analysis of urban form: a multidisciplinary review , 2008 .

[58]  M. Bauer,et al.  Comparison of impervious surface area and normalized difference vegetation index as indicators of surface urban heat island effects in Landsat imagery , 2007 .

[59]  J. Townshend,et al.  Urban growth of the Washington, D.C.–Baltimore, MD metropolitan region from 1984 to 2010 by annual, Landsat-based estimates of impervious cover , 2013 .

[60]  M. Gandy Rethinking urban metabolism: water, space and the modern city , 2004 .

[61]  A. Cazenave,et al.  Sea-Level Rise and Its Impact on Coastal Zones , 2010, Science.

[62]  E. Talen New Urbanism and American Planning: The Conflict of Cultures , 2005 .