The relationship between the perception and production of coarticulation during a sound change in progress.

The present study is concerned with lax /u/-fronting in Standard British English and in particular with whether this sound change in progress can be attributed to a waning of the perceptual compensation for the coarticulatory effects of context. Younger and older speakers produced various monosyllables in which /u/ occurred in different symmetrical consonantal contexts. The same speakers participated in a forced-choice perception experiment in which they categorized a synthetic /I-u/ continuum embedded in fronting /s_t/ and non-fronting /w_l/ contexts. /u/ was shown to be fronted for the younger age group in both production and perception. Although there was no conclusive evidence that younger listeners compensated less for coarticulation than did older listeners, the size of the coarticulatory influence of consonantal context on /u/ in perception was found to be smaller than in production for the younger than for the older group. The findings are consistent with a model of sound change in which the perceptual compensation for coarticulation wanes ahead of changes that take place to coarticulatory relationships in speech production. As a result, the perception and production of coarticulation may be unusually misaligned with respect to each other for some speaker-listeners participating in a sound change in progress.

[1]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  The physiological, acoustic, and perceptual basis of high back vowel fronting: Evidence from German tense and lax vowels , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[2]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Phonetic Analysis of Speech Corpora , 2010 .

[3]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Acoustic consequences of articulatory variability during productions of /t/ and /k/ and its implications for speech error research. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P. S. Beddor.  A Coarticulatory Path to Sound Change , 2009 .

[5]  Michael Grosvald,et al.  Interspeaker variation in the extent and perception of long-distance vowel-to-vowel coarticulation , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[6]  J. Harrington,et al.  Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: an acoustic and perceptual study. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  P. Kiparsky.  The Phonological Basis of Sound Change , 2008 .

[8]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  The quantification of place of articulation assimilation in electropalatographic data using the similarity index (SI) , 2007 .

[9]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  An acoustic analysis of 'happy-tensing' in the Queen's Christmas broadcasts , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[10]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[11]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  The next toolkit , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[12]  Xu Shao,et al.  Clean speech reconstruction from MFCC vectors and fundamental frequency using an integrated front-end , 2006, Speech Commun..

[13]  Sarah Hawkins,et al.  Formant frequencies of RP monophthongs in four age groups of speakers , 2005, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[14]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Parsing coarticulated speech in perception: effects of coarticulation resistance , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[15]  Christoph Draxler,et al.  SpeechRecorder - a Universal Platform Independent Multi-Channel Audio Recording Software , 2004, LREC.

[16]  C. Fowler,et al.  Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[17]  James D. Harnsberger,et al.  Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[18]  David A. Swanson,et al.  State and Local Population Projections: Methodology and Analysis , 2001 .

[19]  S. Manuel.  Coarticulation: Cross-language studies: relating language-particular coarticulation patterns to other language-particular facts , 1999 .

[20]  J Harrington,et al.  Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Felicity Cox,et al.  Vowel Change in Australian English , 1999, Phonetica.

[22]  D. Recasens,et al.  An Electropalatographic and Acoustic Study of Temporal Coarticulation for Catalan Dark/l/ and German Clear/l/ , 1998, Phonetica.

[23]  J. Harrington,et al.  An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels* , 1997 .

[24]  H. Magen.  The extent of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English and Japanese , 1997 .

[25]  Bert Cranen,et al.  Speaker variability in the coarticulation of /a, i, u/ , 1996, Speech Commun..

[26]  J. Ohala,et al.  Coarticulation and Phonology , 1993, Language and speech.

[27]  M. Solé.  Phonetic and Phonological Processes: The Case of Nasalization , 1992 .

[28]  S. Zahorian,et al.  Dynamic spectral shape features as acoustic correlates for initial stop consonants , 1991 .

[29]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Young infants’ perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Patricia A. Keating,et al.  Vowel‐to‐vowel coarticulation in Slavic languages , 1990 .

[31]  H. Traunmüller.  Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale , 1990 .

[32]  Patricia A. Keating,et al.  Cross‐language effects of vowels on consonant onsets , 1988 .

[33]  M. Huffman.  Timing of contextual nasalization in two languages , 1987 .

[34]  Virginia A. Mann,et al.  Distinguishing universal and language-dependent levels of speech perception: Evidence from Japanese listeners' perception of English “l” and “r” , 1986, Cognition.

[35]  H. Magen.  Vowel‐to‐vowel coarticulation in English and Japanese , 1984 .

[36]  Caroline G. Henton,et al.  Changes in the vowels of received pronunciation , 1983 .

[37]  S. Soli.  Second formants in fricatives: Acoustic consequences of fricative‐vowel coarticulation , 1981 .

[38]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction , 1978 .

[39]  J. Ohala,et al.  Phonetic Explanations for the Development of Tones , 1979 .

[40]  Harold Clumeck,et al.  Patterns of soft palate movements in six languages , 1976 .

[41]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Anne Fabricius,et al.  VOWEL FORMANTS AND ANGLE MEASUREMENTS IN DIACHRONIC SOCIOPHONETIC STUDIES: FOOT-FRONTING IN RP , 2007 .

[43]  Francis Nolan,et al.  THE SPEAKER DISCRIMINATING POWER OF SOUNDS UNDERGOING HISTORICAL CHANGE: A FORMANT-BASED STUDY , 2007 .

[44]  Francis Nolan,et al.  DISCRIMINATION OF SPEAKERS USING THE FORMANT DYNAMICS OF /uː/ in BRITISH ENGLISH , 2007 .

[45]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Evidence for a relationship between synchronic variability and diachronic change in the Queen ’ s annual Christmas broadcasts , 2006 .

[46]  J. Ohala.  PHONETIC EXPLANATIONS FOR SOUND PATTERNS: IMPLICATIONS FOR GRAMMARS OF COMPETENCE. , 2005 .

[47]  G. Ambrazaitis,et al.  On the allophonic behaviour of German /x/ vs /k/ - an EPG investigation , 2004 .

[48]  Florian Schiel,et al.  MAUS Goes Iterative , 2004, LREC.

[49]  OhEunjin.  Fronting of back vowels in coronal contexts: a cross- language study , 2002 .

[50]  Felicity Cox,et al.  The changing face of Australian English vowels , 2001 .

[51]  C A Fowler,et al.  Perceptual parsing of acoustic consequences of velum lowering from information for vowels , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  L. Bauer.  Tracing phonetic change in the received pronunciation of British English , 1985 .

[53]  S. Ohman.  Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  Dan Iel Recasens,et al.  An Acoustic Analysis of V-to-c and V-to-v: Coarticulatory Effects in Catalan and Spanish Vcv Sequences , 2022 .