Image guidance could aid performance of atraumatic cochlear implantation surgical techniques

It is widely believed that major factors in achieving atraumatic insertion of the electrode array into the cochlea in cochlear implant (CI) surgery include amount of tissue resection, selection of the entry point, and angle of insertion. Our group is interested in developing an image guidance (IG) system for electrode insertion if IG can improve outcomes. Thus, in this work we conducted the first study evaluating whether IG could aid atraumatic electrode insertion. To do this, we measured the performance of experienced surgeons when tasked to perform cochleostomy resection and to select CI insertion trajectories in virtual 3D surgical field-of-view simulation software. This software, which simulates views through the surgical microscope, was designed to allow a user to manually perform cochleostomy resection and to select a preferred insertion trajectory in one of two modes: (a) where the traditional approach is simulated and sub-surface anatomy is not visible; and (b) where an IG approach is simulated and the surgical view is augmented with rendering of subsurface intra-cochlear structures. We used this software to compare two surgeons’ performance in selecting insertion trajectories with and without IG. Our results show that when using virtual IG, both surgeons could choose insertion trajectories with less variability, select higher quality insertion trajectories, and create the cochleostomy with substantially less tissue resection. These results suggest that IG could indeed aid performance of atraumatic cochlear implantation techniques.

[1]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Cochleostomy site: Implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  Xenia Meshik,et al.  Optimal Cochlear Implant Insertion Vectors , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Automatic Identification and 3D Rendering of Temporal Bone Anatomy , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Automatic segmentation of the facial nerve and chorda tympani in CT images using spatially dependent feature values. , 2008, Medical physics.

[8]  Omid Majdani,et al.  Automatic determination of optimal linear drilling trajectories for cochlear access accounting for drill‐positioning error , 2010, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[9]  Omid Majdani,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Intracochlear Anatomy in Conventional CT , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  G. Marchal,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997 .

[11]  William J. Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.