3D Flexible Refinement: Structure and Motion of Flexible Proteins from Cryo-EM

Single particle cryo-EM excels in determining static structures of biological macromolecules such as proteins. However, many proteins are dynamic, with their motion inherently linked to their function. Recovering the continuous motion and detailed 3D structure of flexible proteins from cryo-EM data has remained an open challenge. We introduce 3D Flexible Refinement (3DFlex), a motion-based deep neural network model of continuous heterogeneity. 3DFlex directly exploits the knowledge that conformational variability of a protein is often the result of physical processes that transport density over space and tend to conserve mass and preserve local geometry. From 2D image data, the 3DFlex model jointly learns a single canonical 3D map, latent coordinate vectors that specify positions on the protein’s conformational landscape, and a flow generator that, given a latent position as input, outputs a 3D deformation field. This deformation field convects the canonical map into appropriate conformations to explain experimental images. Applied to experimental data, 3DFlex learns non-rigid motion spanning several orders of magnitude while preserving high-resolution details of secondary structure elements. Further, 3DFlex resolves canonical maps that are improved relative to conventional refinement methods because particle images contribute to the maps coherently regardless of the conformation of the protein in the image. Together, the ability to obtain insight into motion in macromolecules, as well as the ability to resolve features that are usually lost in cryo-EM of flexible specimens, will provide new insight and allow new avenues of investigation into biomolecular structure and function.

[1]  Dong Si,et al.  Neural representations of cryo-EM maps and a graph-based interpretation , 2021, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  David J. Fleet,et al.  3D Variability Analysis: Resolving continuous flexibility and discrete heterogeneity from single particle cryo-EM. , 2021, Journal of structural biology.

[3]  S. Ludtke,et al.  Deep learning based mixed-dimensional GMM for characterizing variability in CryoEM , 2021, Nature Methods.

[4]  Ellen D. Zhong,et al.  CryoDRGN: Reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks , 2021, Nature Methods.

[5]  Youdong Mao,et al.  Deep manifold learning reveals hidden dynamics of proteasome autoregulation , 2020, ArXiv.

[6]  Suvrajit Maji,et al.  Propagation of Conformational Coordinates Across Angular Space in Mapping the Continuum of States from Cryo-EM Data by Manifold Embedding , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction , 2019, Nature Methods.

[8]  Kailash Ramlaul,et al.  Mitigating local over-fitting during single particle reconstruction with SIDESPLITTER , 2019, bioRxiv.

[9]  Joakim Andén,et al.  Hyper-molecules: on the representation and recovery of dynamical structures for applications in flexible macro-molecules in cryo-EM , 2019, Inverse Problems.

[10]  Joakim Andén,et al.  Cryo-EM reconstruction of continuous heterogeneity by Laplacian spectral volumes , 2019, Inverse problems.

[11]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  From Variational to Deterministic Autoencoders , 2019, ICLR.

[12]  Dmitry Lyumkis,et al.  Challenges and opportunities in cryo-EM single-particle analysis , 2019, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  Richard A. Newcombe,et al.  DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representation , 2019, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[14]  Sebastian Nowozin,et al.  Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Space , 2018, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[15]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modeling , 2018, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[16]  Joachim Frank,et al.  Functional Pathways of Biomolecules Retrieved from Single-particle Snapshots , 2018, bioRxiv.

[17]  E. Lindahl,et al.  Characterisation of molecular motions in cryo-EM single-particle data by multi-body refinement in RELION , 2018, bioRxiv.

[18]  David Duvenaud,et al.  Inference Suboptimality in Variational Autoencoders , 2018, ICML.

[19]  Alexis Rohou,et al.  cisTEM: User-friendly software for single-particle image processing , 2017, bioRxiv.

[20]  Joakim Andén,et al.  Structural Variability from Noisy Tomographic Projections , 2017, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[21]  D. Tegunov,et al.  Structures of transcription pre-initiation complex with TFIIH and Mediator , 2017, Nature.

[22]  Roy R. Lederman,et al.  Continuously heterogeneous hyper-objects in cryo-EM and 3-D movies of many temporal dimensions , 2017, ArXiv.

[23]  David J. Fleet,et al.  cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination , 2017, Nature Methods.

[24]  Joachim Frank,et al.  Continuous changes in structure mapped by manifold embedding of single-particle data in cryo-EM. , 2016, Methods.

[25]  D. Julius,et al.  TRPV1 structures in nanodiscs reveal mechanisms of ligand and lipid action , 2016, Nature.

[26]  C. Oubridge,et al.  CryoEM structure of the yeast U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP at 3.7 Å resolution , 2016, Nature.

[27]  Murali Rao,et al.  Directly reconstructing principal components of heterogeneous particles from cryo-EM images. , 2015, Journal of structural biology.

[28]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[29]  Hstau Y Liao,et al.  Trajectories of the ribosome as a Brownian nanomachine , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Max Welling,et al.  Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes , 2013, ICLR.

[31]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning , 2013, ICML.

[32]  Sjors H.W. Scheres,et al.  RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination , 2012, Journal of structural biology.

[33]  Shaoxia Chen,et al.  Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination , 2012, Nature Methods.

[34]  Sjors H.W. Scheres,et al.  A Bayesian View on Cryo-EM Structure Determination , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[35]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  Identifying conformational states of macromolecules by eigen-analysis of resampled cryo-EM images. , 2011, Structure.

[36]  I. Bahar,et al.  Normal mode analysis : theory and applications to biological and chemical systems , 2005 .

[37]  R. Henderson,et al.  Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[39]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[40]  W. Kabsch A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors , 1976 .

[41]  S H W Scheres,et al.  Processing of Structurally Heterogeneous Cryo-EM Data in RELION. , 2016, Methods in enzymology.

[42]  G. Herman,et al.  Disentangling conformational states of macromolecules in 3D-EM through likelihood optimization , 2007, Nature Methods.

[43]  Nikolaus Grigorieff,et al.  FREALIGN: high-resolution refinement of single particle structures. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.