Transport on Riemannian Manifold for Connectivity-Based Brain Decoding

There is a recent interest in using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for decoding more naturalistic, cognitive states, in which subjects perform various tasks in a continuous, self-directed manner. In this setting, the set of brain volumes over the entire task duration is usually taken as a single sample with connectivity estimates, such as Pearson's correlation, employed as features. Since covariance matrices live on the positive semidefinite cone, their elements are inherently inter-related. The assumption of uncorrelated features implicit in most classifier learning algorithms is thus violated. Coupled with the usual small sample sizes, the generalizability of the learned classifiers is limited, and the identification of significant brain connections from the classifier weights is nontrivial. In this paper, we present a Riemannian approach for connectivity-based brain decoding. The core idea is to project the covariance estimates onto a common tangent space to reduce the statistical dependencies between their elements. For this, we propose a matrix whitening transport, and compare it against parallel transport implemented via the Schild's ladder algorithm. To validate our classification approach, we apply it to fMRI data acquired from twenty four subjects during four continuous, self-driven tasks. We show that our approach provides significantly higher classification accuracy than directly using Pearson's correlation and its regularized variants as features. To facilitate result interpretation, we further propose a non-parametric scheme that combines bootstrapping and permutation testing for identifying significantly discriminative brain connections from the classifier weights. Using this scheme, a number of neuro-anatomically meaningful connections are detected, whereas no significant connections are found with pure permutation testing.

[1]  P. Bühlmann Statistical significance in high-dimensional linear models , 2013 .

[2]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  M. S. Knebelman Spaces of Relative Parallelism , 1951 .

[4]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[5]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  Clinical applications of the functional connectome , 2013, NeuroImage.

[6]  Gary H Glover,et al.  Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: Statistical power analyses , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Transport on Riemannian Manifold for Functional Connectivity-Based Classification , 2014, MICCAI.

[8]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Riemannian geometry for the statistical analysis of diffusion tensor data , 2007, Signal Process..

[9]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Classification with correlated features: unreliability of feature ranking and solutions , 2011, Bioinform..

[10]  J. T. Erichsen,et al.  Hippocampal–anterior thalamic pathways for memory: uncovering a network of direct and indirect actions , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[12]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Decoding brain states from fMRI connectivity graphs , 2011, NeuroImage.

[13]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: Evidence from functional MRI , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[14]  M. Herrmann,et al.  Common brain regions underlying different arithmetic operations as revealed by conjunct fMRI–BOLD activation , 2007, Brain Research.

[15]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Bernard Ng,et al.  Identification of Mood-Relevant Brain Connections Using a Continuous, Subject-Driven Rumination Paradigm. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Overt and imagined singing of an Italian aria , 2007, NeuroImage.

[18]  Adel Javanmard,et al.  Confidence intervals and hypothesis testing for high-dimensional regression , 2013, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Bertrand Thirion,et al.  A disconnection account of Gerstmann syndrome: Functional neuroanatomy evidence , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[20]  M. Greicius,et al.  Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[22]  Peter Buhlmann Statistical significance in high-dimensional linear models , 2012, 1202.1377.

[23]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Schild's Ladder for the Parallel Transport of Deformations in Time Series of Images , 2011, IPMI.

[24]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  A Novel Sparse Graphical Approach for Multimodal Brain Connectivity Inference , 2012, MICCAI.

[25]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  Matthew S. Cain,et al.  Rostral and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex make dissociable contributions during antisaccade error commission , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Detection of Brain Functional-Connectivity Difference in Post-stroke Patients Using Group-Level Covariance Modeling , 2010, MICCAI.

[28]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[29]  M. Petrides The role of the mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in working memory , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  A Riemannian Framework for Tensor Computing , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[31]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Shrinkage Algorithms for MMSE Covariance Estimation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[32]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Fast and Simple Calculus on Tensors in the Log-Euclidean Framework , 2005, MICCAI.

[35]  Søren Hauberg,et al.  Unscented Kalman Filtering on Riemannian Manifolds , 2013, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[36]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[37]  Pradeep Ravikumar,et al.  Sparse inverse covariance matrix estimation using quadratic approximation , 2011, MLSLP.