Spatial structure affects temporal judgments: evidence for a synchrony binding code.

Visual binding is the process by which the brain groups the elements belonging to one object, whilst segregating them from other scene elements. A computationally parsimonious mechanism of visual binding is the binding-by-synchrony (BBS) hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, detectors that respond to elements of a single object fire in synchrony, while detectors that respond to elements of different objects do not. Current psychophysical and physiological evidence are inconclusive about the role of BBS in the visual integration process. Here we provide psychophysical and computational evidence suggesting that the visual system implements a mechanism that synchronizes response onsets to object parts and attenuates or cancels their latency differences. In three experiments, observers had to judge the synchrony of two flickering Gabor patches embedded in a static Gabor contour, passing through fixation. We found that a smooth contour, as compared to a jagged one, impedes judgments of temporal synchrony between the targets, whilst facilitating non-temporal judgments of contrast on the same targets. We show that the results are consistent with a simple computational model that implements synchronization of responses via lateral interactions, enabling the visual system to pick up objects by synchrony among a temporally diverse background.

[1]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.

[2]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[3]  UTE LEONARDS,et al.  The Influence of Temporal Phase Differences on Texture Segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[4]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Contour Saliency in Primary Visual Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[5]  M. Usher,et al.  Perceptual grouping based on temporal structure: Impact of subliminal flicker and visual transients , 2006 .

[6]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Transient Spatial Attention Degrades Temporal Resolution , 2003, Psychological science.

[7]  Koch,et al.  Oscillator-phase coupling for different two-dimensional network connectivities. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[8]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Visual Grouping and the Focusing of Attention Induce Gamma-band Oscillations at Different Frequencies in Human Magnetoencephalogram Signals , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  R Blake,et al.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure. , 1999, Science.

[10]  Z Li,et al.  Visual segmentation by contextual influences via intra-cortical interactions in the primary visual cortex. , 1999, Network.

[11]  M Fahle,et al.  Figure–ground discrimination from temporal information , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  H. Barlow,et al.  Single Units and Sensation: A Neuron Doctrine for Perceptual Psychology? , 1972, Perception.

[13]  C. Gray The Temporal Correlation Hypothesis of Visual Feature Integration Still Alive and Well , 1999, Neuron.

[14]  R. B. Heisch How, what and why. , 1963, East African medical journal.

[15]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Does Neuronal Synchrony Underlie Visual Feature Grouping? , 2005, Neuron.

[16]  D. Sagi,et al.  Mechanisms for spatial integration in visual detection: a model based on lateral interactions. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[17]  T. S. Lee,et al.  Gestalten of Today: Early Processing of Visual Contours and Surfaces , 1996 .

[18]  R. Eckhorn,et al.  Coherent oscillations: A mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex? , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[19]  Geoffrey M. Ghose,et al.  Specialized Representations in Visual Cortex A Role for Binding? , 1999, Neuron.

[20]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Neural synergy in visual grouping: when good continuation meets common fate , 2001, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[22]  E. Miller,et al.  Response to Comment on "Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices" , 2007, Science.

[23]  M. Usher,et al.  The effects of temporal synchrony on the perceived organization of elements in spatially symmetric and asymmetric grids , 2001 .

[24]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Integration of Local Features into Global Shapes Monkey and Human fMRI Studies , 2003, Neuron.

[25]  W. Singer,et al.  Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  C. Malsburg Binding in models of perception and brain function , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain , 2000 .

[28]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[30]  J. Movshon,et al.  Cortical oscillatory responses do not affect visual segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[31]  P. Milner A model for visual shape recognition. , 1974, Psychological review.

[32]  Steven C Dakin,et al.  Role of synchrony in contour binding: some transient doubts sustained. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[33]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Spatial grouping in human vision: Temporal structure trumps temporal synchrony , 2007, Vision Research.

[34]  Marius Usher,et al.  Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception , 1998, Nature.

[35]  H. Müller,et al.  Synchronous Information Presented in 40-HZ Flicker Enhances Visual Feature Binding , 1998 .

[36]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding , 1995, Vision Research.

[37]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  Rapid global form binding with loss of associated colors. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[38]  N Lavie,et al.  On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  C D Gilbert,et al.  Circuitry, architecture, and functional dynamics of visual cortex. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Synchrony does not promote grouping in temporally structured displays , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  C. von der Malsburg The what and why of binding: the modeler's perspective. , 1999, Neuron.

[43]  R. Desimone,et al.  Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention , 2001, Science.

[44]  D. Field,et al.  The role of “contrast enhancement” in the detection and appearance of visual contours , 1998, Vision Research.

[45]  Marius Usher,et al.  Short Term Memory and Selection Processes in a Frontal-Lobe Model , 1999 .

[46]  R. Eckhorn,et al.  High frequency (60-90 Hz) oscillations in primary visual cortex of awake monkey. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[47]  David Alais,et al.  The mechanisms of collinear integration. , 2006, Journal of vision.