Modeling Speech Level as a Function of Background Noise Level and Talker-to-Listener Distance for Talkers Wearing Hearing Protection Devices.

Purpose Studying the variations in speech levels with changing background noise level and talker-to-listener distance for talkers wearing hearing protection devices (HPDs) can aid in understanding communication in background noise. Method Speech was recorded using an intra-aural HPD from 12 different talkers at 5 different distances in 3 different noise conditions and 2 quiet conditions. Results This article proposes models that can predict the difference in speech level as a function of background noise level and talker-to-listener distance for occluded talkers. The proposed model complements the existing model presented by Pelegrín-García, Smits, Brunskog, and Jeong (2011) and expands on it by taking into account the effects of occlusion and background noise level on changes in speech sound level. Conclusions Three models of the relationship between vocal effort, background noise level, and talker-to-listener distance for talkers wearing HPDs are presented. The model with the best prediction intervals is a talker-dependent model that requires the users' unoccluded speech level at 10 m as a reference. A model describing the relationship between speech level, talker-to-listener distance, and background noise level for occluded talkers could eventually be incorporated with radio protocols to transmit verbal communication only to an intended set of listeners within a given spatial range-this range being dependent on the changes in speech level and background noise level.

[1]  Herman J. M. Steeneken,et al.  Assessment for automatic speech recognition: II. NOISEX-92: A database and an experiment to study the effect of additive noise on speech recognition systems , 1993, Speech Commun..

[2]  David Byrne,et al.  Influence of ear canal occlusion and air-conduction feedback on speech production in noise , 2014 .

[3]  H. Lane,et al.  The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech , 1971 .

[4]  T Landis,et al.  Role of bone conduction in the self-perception of speech. , 1990, Folia phoniatrica.

[5]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Four-day-follow-up study on the voice monitoring of primary school teachers: Relationships with conversational task and classroom acoustics. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Marion Dohen,et al.  The Lombard Effect: a physiological reflex or a controlled intelligibility enhancement? , 2006 .

[7]  Robert M. Judish,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Methods , 1984 .

[8]  Jérémie Voix,et al.  Integration of a distance sensitive wireless communication protocol to hearing protectors equipped with in-ear microphones , 2013 .

[9]  Jérémie Voix,et al.  Variations in voice level and fundamental frequency with changing background noise level and talker-to-listener distance while wearing hearing protectors: A pilot study , 2016, International journal of audiology.

[10]  R. Navarro,et al.  Effects of Ear Canal Occlusion and Masking on the Perception of Voice , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  Marc Schröder,et al.  Emotional speech synthesis: a review , 2001, INTERSPEECH.

[12]  Georg v. Békésy,et al.  The Structure of the Middle Ear and the Hearing of One's Own Voice by Bone Conduction , 1949 .

[13]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Accurate vocal compensation for sound intensity loss with increasing distance in natural environments. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Tomasz Letowski,et al.  Bone Conduction: Anatomy, Physiology, and Communication , 2007 .

[15]  Pasquale Bottalico,et al.  Evaluation of the starting point of the Lombard Effect. , 2017, Acta acustica united with acustica : the journal of the European Acoustics Association.

[16]  F. N. Martin,et al.  Insert earphone depth and the occlusion effect. , 2000, American journal of audiology.

[17]  H. Traunmüller,et al.  Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Jérémie Voix,et al.  The objective measurement of individual earplug field performance. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Donald F. Morrison,et al.  Applied linear statistical methods , 1983 .

[20]  Yvan Petit,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element modeling of the human external ear: simulation study of the bone conduction occlusion effect. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  H. Brumm,et al.  The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research , 2011 .

[22]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[23]  Cheol-Ho Jeong,et al.  Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Four-day Follow-up Study on the Self-reported Voice Condition and Noise Condition of Teachers: Relationship Between Vocal Parameters and Classroom Acoustics. , 2017, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[25]  Jean-Claude Junqua,et al.  The Lombard effect: a reflex to better communicate with others in noise , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[26]  H. Brumm,et al.  The Lombard effect , 2011, Current Biology.

[27]  Gang Feng,et al.  Talker-to-listener distance effects on the variations of the intensity and the fundamental frequency of speech , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[28]  Pasquale Bottalico,et al.  Speech Adjustments for Room Acoustics and Their Effects on Vocal Effort. , 2017, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[29]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  The Hcrc Map Task Corpus , 1991 .

[31]  D. Dubois,et al.  Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction on the Lombard effect. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[32]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Duration of voicing and silence periods of continuous speech in different acoustic environments. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  K. D. Kryter Effects of Ear Protective Devices on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise , 1946 .

[34]  Tom Frank,et al.  Speech production in noise with and without hearing protection. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Cheol-Ho Jeong,et al.  Equal autophonic level curves under different room acoustics conditions. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.