Revaluation of geometric cues reduces landmark discrimination via within-compound associations
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Timberlake,et al. Beacon training in a water maze can facilitate and compete with subsequent room cue learning in rats. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[2] J. Pearce,et al. Between-cue associations influence searching for a hidden goal in an environment with a distinctive shape. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[3] M. Bouton,et al. Potentiation of taste by another taste during compound aversion learning , 1987 .
[4] Guillem R. Esber,et al. Absence of overshadowing between a landmark and geometric cues in a distinctively shaped environment: a test of Miller and Shettleworth (2007). , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[5] J Ward-Robinson,et al. Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[6] J. Pearce,et al. Absence of Overshadowing and Blocking between Landmarks and the Geometric Cues Provided by the Shape of a Test Arena , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.
[7] Sara J Shettleworth,et al. The geometric module in the rat: independence of shape and feature learning in a food finding task , 2004, Learning & behavior.
[8] Yutaka Kosaki,et al. Overshadowing of geometry learning by discrete landmarks in the water maze: effects of relative salience and relative validity of competing cues. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[9] Joseph M. Austen,et al. Within-compound associations explain potentiation and failure to overshadow learning based on geometry by discrete landmarks. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[10] Laura A. Freberg,et al. The extinction of within-compound flavor associations , 1978 .
[11] R. C. Honey,et al. Integration of geometric with luminance information in the rat: evidence from within-compound associations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[12] Debbie M. Kelly,et al. Features enhance the encoding of geometry , 2010, Animal Cognition.
[13] C. Gallistel. The organization of learning , 1990 .
[14] Neil Burgess,et al. Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[15] J. Pearce,et al. Potentiation and overshadowing between landmarks and environmental geometric cues , 2011, Learning & behavior.
[16] K. Cheng. A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.
[17] J. Pearce,et al. Failure of a landmark to restrict spatial learning based on the shape of the environment , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.
[18] R. F. Wang,et al. Comparative approaches to human navigation , 2003 .
[19] E. Spelke,et al. Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .
[20] J. Pearce,et al. Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[21] M. Cole,et al. Potentiation and overshadowing of shape by wall color in a kite-shaped maze using rats in a foraging task , 2011 .
[22] Allen Cheung,et al. The information content of panoramic images I: The rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[23] Peter M. Jones,et al. Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[24] Allen Cheung,et al. The information content of panoramic images II: view-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[25] Michael Kofler. The Test Environment , 2001 .
[26] M. Bouton,et al. Potentiation and overshadowing in odor-aversion learning: Role of method of odor presentation, the distal-proximal cue distinction, and the conditionability of odor , 1986 .