Some Contemporary Approaches

Publisher Summary This chapter describes various approaches to the problem of inducing resistance to persuasion, and presents a number of variations on each approach. Persuasive messages are known to be more effective if they are presented with their conclusions explicitly drawn, rather than left to be drawn by the recipient. Several ways of inducing resistance to persuasion, and some possibly pretreatments—like enhancing the person's tendency to use perceptual distortion in the defense of his preconceptions—are included in the chapter. Some contemporary approaches to inducing resistance to persuasion include the behavioral commitment approach, anchoring the belief to other cognitions, inducing resistance cognitive states, and prior training in resting persuasive attempts. It is believed that with better education the individual becomes more resistant to persuasion. However, empirical research does not consistently support such a proposition. It is by no means clear that any general-education manipulation would have the effect of increasing resistance to persuasion. Training more specifically tailored to reduce susceptibility to persuasion might be more successful. There is some evidence that the more intelligent are more resistant to conformity pressures from peers, but they also seem to be more susceptible to the mass-media kind of persuasion attempts. Further experiments will have to determine, if inoculation theory will predict the immunizing efficacy of various types of defenses in the case of controversial beliefs as successfully as it has for truisms.

[1]  H. Kelley,et al.  Members' reactions to apparent group approval of a counternorm communication. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Acceptance of punishment and change in belief. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[3]  W. Mcguire,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF FOREWARNING IN DEVELOPING RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION , 1962 .

[4]  S. Schachter,et al.  Group-Derived Restraints and Audience Persuasion , 1952 .

[5]  E. Cooper,et al.  Analysis of the Film “Don't Be a Sucker”: A Study in Communication , 1951 .

[6]  Carl I. Hovland,et al.  Personality and Persuasibility. , 1960 .

[7]  W. J. McGuier Persistence of the resistance to persuasion induced by various types of prior belief defenses. , 1962 .

[8]  T. Newcomb The acquaintance process , 1961 .

[9]  H. Kelley,et al.  The Resistance to Change of Group-Anchored Attitudes , 1952 .

[10]  N. Anderson,et al.  Test of a model for opinion change. , 1959, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[11]  J. P. Das,et al.  Understanding versus suggestion in the judgement of literary passages. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[12]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  The interest value and relevance of fear-arousing communications. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[13]  B. J. Fine,et al.  The effect of induced aggressiveness on opinion change. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[15]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Cognitive consistency and attitude change. , 1960 .

[16]  P. Tannenbaum The Indexing Process in Communication , 1955 .

[17]  B. Mausner,et al.  The effect of prior reinforcement on the interaction of observer pairs. , 1954, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[18]  J. Brehm,et al.  Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance , 1962 .

[19]  R. M. Collier The Effect of Propaganda upon Attitude Following a Critical Examination of the Propaganda Itself , 1944 .

[20]  R. Crutchfield Conformity and character. , 1955 .

[21]  J. Brehm,et al.  Attitude change and justification for compliance. , 1958, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[22]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[23]  Percy H. Tannenbaum,et al.  Initial Attitude Toward Source and Concept as Factors in Attitude Change Through Communication , 1956 .

[24]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. , 1961 .

[25]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Direct and indirect persuasive effects of dissonance-producing messages. , 1960 .

[26]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  Readings in Social Psychology , 1960 .

[27]  Joseph T. Klapper,et al.  The effects of mass communication , 1960 .

[28]  W. Mcguire,et al.  The generality of immunity to persuasion produced by pre-exposure to weakened counterarguments. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[29]  R. Zajonc The process of cognitive tuning in communication. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[30]  H. Kelley,et al.  Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[31]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Communications Research: 1948-1949. , 1949 .

[32]  R. Lana Pretest-treatment interaction effects in attitudinal studies. , 1959 .

[33]  C. I. Hovland The Order Of Presentation In Persuasion , 1966 .

[34]  C I HOVLAND,et al.  An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[35]  H. Kelman Effects of success and failure on "suggestibility" in the autokinetic situation. , 1950, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[36]  Irving L. Janis,et al.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of Improvised Versus Non-Improvised Role-Playing in Producing Opinion Changes , 1956 .

[37]  Ewart E. Smith THE POWER OF DISSONANCE TECHNIQUES TO CHANGE ATTITUDES , 1961 .

[38]  I. Janis,et al.  Effect of fear-arousing communications. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[39]  Rosenbaum Me,et al.  Opinion change as a function of external commitment and amount of discrepancy from the opinion of another. , 1960 .

[40]  M. Rosenbaum,et al.  The Effect of External Commitment on Response to an Attempt to Change Opinions , 1959 .

[41]  William J. McGuire,et al.  The Effectiveness of Supportive and Refutational Defenses in Immunizing and Restoring Beliefs Against Persuasion , 1961 .

[42]  K. Lewin Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[43]  J. Harding,et al.  An experiment in training volunteers to answer anti-minority remarks. , 1950, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[44]  E. Carlson Attitude change through modification of attitude structure. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[45]  F. Samelson,et al.  Conforming behavior under two conditions of conflict in the cognitive field. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[46]  M. J. Rosenberg Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[47]  Edith Becker Bennett Discussion, Decision, Commitment, and Consensus in "Group Decision'" , 1955 .

[48]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Reinstatement of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[49]  R. Freeman,et al.  Intertrial effects of immediate self-committal in a continuous social influence situation. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[50]  A. A. Lumsdaine,et al.  Experiments On Mass Communication , 1949 .

[51]  Floyd H. Allport,et al.  Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: why some people believe them. , 1945 .

[52]  J. M. Hicks,et al.  Attitude change and mental hospital experience.. , 1962 .

[53]  I. Steiner Receptivity to supportive versus nonsupportive communications. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[54]  W. Mcguire,et al.  The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[55]  Herbert C. Kelman,et al.  Attitude Change as a Function of Response Restriction , 1953 .

[56]  B. Latané,et al.  Choice of strategy and voluntary exposure to information under public and private conditions. , 1959, Journal of personality.

[57]  J. Nunnally,et al.  Variables governing the willingness to receive communications on mental health. , 1959, Journal of personality.