Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture: An Empirical Comparison of Display-Size and Distance Methods

Four experiments examined attentional capture by colour as assessed by two different investigative methods. Subjects performed a visual search task for a vertical-target line embedded among tilted-distractor lines, presented inside 4, 8, or 12 coloured discs. Interestingly, when the colour singleton was task irrelevant, and data were analysed by means of the display-size method combined with the zero-slope criterion, no evidence for attentional capture by colour was found. However, when data were analysed by means of the distance method, which consists of monitoring the spatial relationship between the target and the singleton, results showed that the target was found faster and/or more accurately when it was inside the singleton than when it was in a nonsingleton location. This provided evidence for a stimulus-driven attentional capture. In addition, the application of signal detection methodology showed that attentional capture, as revealed by the distance method, resulted from a perceptual modulation at the singleton location, rather than from a criterion shift. We conclude that, at least with the kind of stimuli used here, the display-size method combined with the zero-slope criterion is less than ideal for investigating how static discontinuities can affect the automatic deployment of visual attention.

[1]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention? , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[3]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[8]  U. Neisser.  VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[9]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Visual processing capacity and attentional control. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[14]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[16]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  J. Jonides.  Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[18]  J. Townsend.  SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[19]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location , 2014 .

[20]  Amishi P. Jha,et al.  Promoting Novelty in Vision: Inhibition of Return Modulates Perceptual-Level Processing , 1999 .

[21]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture , 1993 .

[22]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[26]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  Attenuated Change Blindness for Exogenously Attended Items in a Flicker Paradigm , 2000 .

[28]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Gernot Horstmann,et al.  Evidence for Attentional Capture by a Surprising Color Singleton in Visual Search , 2002, Psychological science.

[30]  B. Julesz,et al.  Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[31]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[33]  K. Cave.  The FeatureGate model of visual selection , 1999, Psychological research.

[34]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[35]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  D. Simons.  Attentional capture and inattentional blindness , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Jocelyn Faubert,et al.  The influence of two spatially distinct primers and attribute priming on motion induction , 1995, Vision Research.

[38]  M. Turatto,et al.  Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  K. Cave,et al.  Flexibility in Spatial Attention Before and After Practice , 1997 .

[40]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Parallel processing of multielement displays , 1972 .

[41]  V. Lollo,et al.  The preattentive emperor has no clothes: a dynamic redressing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Steven Todd,et al.  Attentional misguidance in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[44]  J T Todd,et al.  Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  V Di Lollo,et al.  The preattentive emperor has no clothes: a dynamic redressing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  J. Faubert,et al.  Flicker and the efficiency of cues for capturing attention , 1999, Vision Research.

[49]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[50]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’ , 1999, Nature.

[51]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  A review of attentional capture: On its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control. , 2002 .

[52]  B. Gibson,et al.  Surprise! An Unexpected Color Singleton Does Not Capture Attention in Visual Search , 1998 .

[53]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.