The paper explores the relation between collective memory and social theory, trying in particular to show the key role that the notion of collective memory plays in
understanding the dynamics of the social process (structuration, genesis of social
structure). It does it by means of a series of reinterpretations of classical authors. Investigating the phenomenon of forgetting as covering up the traces of social change
(M. Halbwachs), problematized in the contemporary context (P. Bourdieu), leads
us to unraveling the problematic character of social change as such in a vain effort of annulment of memory (A. Touraine), and finally to rediscovering of social
memory at a deeper level, as a profound structure of social processes. This discovery
points to the necessity of introducing a new, yet undeveloped method of studying
the social unconscious (A. Giddens, J. Assmann, and in particular J. Alexander).
Jeffrey Alexander overtly postulates such a development, identifying his major
project of cultural sociology with a kind of social psychoanalysis. The paper ends
with a question – where such a postulate leads us to? Perhaps we need a new
kind of art of benevolent interpretation that brings along with new understanding
also some kind of soothing the pain of misery, deeply inscribed in social existence.
[1]
Uwe Fink,et al.
Practical Reason On The Theory Of Action
,
2016
.
[2]
J. Assmann,et al.
Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance and political imagination
,
2013,
New Contree.
[3]
Jeffrey Alexander.
The meanings of (social) lifeOn the Origins of a Cultural Sociology
,
2003
.
[4]
J. Alexander.
After Neofunctionalism: Action, Culture, and Civil Society
,
1998
.
[5]
J. Allwood.
THEORY OF ACTION
,
1995
.
[6]
J. Alexander,et al.
Action and Its Environments
,
1988
.
[7]
C. Castoriadis,et al.
The Imaginary Institution of Society
,
1987
.
[8]
A. Kellerman,et al.
The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration
,
2015
.
[9]
Trond E. Jacobsen,et al.
The Collective Memory
,
1980
.