Luhmann Reconsidered: Steps Towards an Empirical Research Programme in the Sociology of Communication?

Although Luhmann formulated with modesty and precaution, for example in Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft (1990a, at pp. 412f.), that his theory claims to be a universal one because it is self-referential, the "operational closure" that follows from this assumption easily generates a problem for empirical research. Can a theory which considers society--and science as one of its subsystems--operationally closed, nevertheless contribute to the project of Enlightenment which Popper (1945) so vigorously identified as the driver of an open society? How can a theory which proclaims itself to be circular and universal nevertheless claim to celebrate "the triumph of the Enlightenment" Luhmann, (1990a, at p. 548)? Is the lack of an empirical program of research building on Luhmann's theory fortuitous or does it indicate that this theory should be considered as a philosophy rather than a heuristic for the explanation of operations in social systems?

[1]  A. T. Parsons,et al.  On the Concept of Political Power , 2008 .

[2]  H. Maibom Social Systems , 2007 .

[3]  Colin B. Grant Uncertainty and Communication: New Theoretical Investigations , 2007 .

[4]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The biological metaphor of a second-order observer and the sociological discourse , 2006, Kybernetes.

[5]  David Seidl,et al.  Organizations as Distinction Generating and Processing Systems: Niklas Luhmann’s Contribution to Organization Studies , 2006 .

[6]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[7]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Metaphors and Diaphors in Science Communication , 2005 .

[8]  Manfred Bonitz,et al.  The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement and self-organization of scientific communications , 1996, Scientometrics.

[9]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Intersubjektivität oder Kommunikation: Unterschiedliche Ausgangspunkte soziologischer Theoriebildung , 2005 .

[10]  D. Baecker Form und Formen der Kommunikation , 2005 .

[11]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Laws of Form , 2003 .

[12]  Raf Vanderstraeten,et al.  Parsons, Luhmann and the Theorem of Double Contingency , 2002 .

[13]  8 How Can the Mind Participate in Communication? , 2002, Theories of Distinction.

[14]  Tracy Brown,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2002, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[15]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A sociological theory of communication: The self-organization of the knowledge-cased society. , 2001 .

[16]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication , 2000 .

[17]  Colin B. Grant Functions and Fictions of Communication , 2000 .

[18]  N. Luhmann The Paradox of Form , 1999, Problems of Form.

[19]  D. Baecker Problems of form , 2001 .

[20]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft , 1997 .

[21]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Why Words and Co-Words Cannot Map the Development of the Sciences , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[22]  L. Leydesdorff Luhmann's sociological theory: its operationalization and future perspectives , 1996 .

[23]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications , 2001 .

[24]  L. Henderson On the Social System , 1993 .

[25]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Die Wissenschaft Der Gesellschaft , 1992 .

[26]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The static and dynamic analysis of network data using information theory , 1991 .

[27]  Edmund Husserl,et al.  Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge , 1991 .

[28]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Foundations of Cognitive Science , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  N. Luhmann,et al.  The Cognitive Program of Constructivism and a Reality that Remains Unknown , 1990 .

[30]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The politics of explanation: An alternative , 1988 .

[31]  J. Law The Heterogeneity of Texts , 1986 .

[32]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[33]  M. Mulkay,et al.  Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse , 1984 .

[34]  N. Luhmann Soziale Systeme : Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie , 1984 .

[35]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[36]  Niklas Luhmann Interpenetration — Zum Verhältnis personaler und sozialer Systeme , 1981 .

[37]  F. Krauss Latent Structure Analysis , 1980 .

[38]  J. Goguen,et al.  Systems and Distinctions; Duality and Complementarity , 1979 .

[39]  H. Maturana Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality , 2014 .

[40]  H. Augustin,et al.  Multiple angiopoietin recombinant proteins activate the Tie1 receptor tyrosine kinase and promote its interaction with Tie2 , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  A. Giddens NEW RULES OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHOD , 1980 .

[42]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  The subjective side of science : Mitroff, Ian I., Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974, 329 pp., $11.50 , 1976 .

[43]  R. May,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of Competition Between Three Species , 1975 .

[44]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1973 .

[45]  J. Francisco,et al.  A CALCULUS FOR SELF-REFERENCE , 1975 .

[46]  D. H. Freeman Statistical Decomposition Analysis , 1974 .

[47]  M. Crowe,et al.  INTERACTION: Social Interaction. , 1974 .

[48]  H. Foerster The Cybernetics of Cybernetics , 1974 .

[49]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[50]  Humberto R. Maturana,et al.  Cognition , 1999, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[51]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Latent Structure Analysis. , 1969 .

[52]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  The Subjective Side of Science , 1969 .

[53]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[54]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  ON THE CONCEPT OF INFLUENCE , 1963 .

[55]  K. Popper,et al.  The Arrow of Time , 1956, Nature.

[56]  Y. Bar-Hillel An Examination of Information Theory , 1955, Philosophy of Science.

[57]  Edmund Husserl,et al.  Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und Phänomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch, Allgemeine Einführung in die Reine Phänomenologie , 1951 .