Impact of Modality Choice on Rates of Hospitalization in Patients Eligible for Both Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis

♦ Background: Hospitalization rates are a relevant consideration when choosing or recommending a dialysis modality. Previous comparisons of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) have not been restricted to individuals who were eligible for both therapies. ♦ Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study of people 18 years of age and older who were eligible for both PD and HD, and who started outpatient dialysis between 2007 and 2010 in four Canadian dialysis programs. Zero-inflated negative binomial models, adjusted for baseline patient characteristics, were used to examine the association between modality choice and rates of hospitalization. ♦ Results: The study enrolled 314 patients. A trend in the HD group toward higher rates of hospitalization, observed in the primary analysis, became significant when modality was treated as a time-varying exposure or when the population was restricted to elective outpatient starts in patients with at least 4 months of pre-dialysis care. Cardiovascular disease, infectious complications, and elective surgery were the most common reasons for hospital admission; only 23% of hospital stays were directly related to complications of dialysis or kidney disease. ♦ Conclusions: Efforts to promote PD utilization are unlikely to result in increased rates of hospitalization, and efforts to reduce hospital admissions should focus on potentially avoidable causes of cardiovascular disease and infectious complications.

[1]  J. Pajek Overcoming the Underutilisation of Peritoneal Dialysis , 2015, BioMed research international.

[2]  Jeffrey M Albert,et al.  Estimating overall exposure effects for zero-inflated regression models with application to dental caries , 2014, Statistical methods in medical research.

[3]  J. Guzmán Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata , 2013 .

[4]  A. Kiss,et al.  Choosing peritoneal dialysis reduces the risk of invasive access interventions. , 2012, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[5]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Selection bias explains apparent differential mortality between dialysis modalities. , 2011, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[6]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Predicting the Risk of 1-Year Mortality in Incident Dialysis Patients: Accounting for Case-Mix Severity in Studies Using Administrative Data , 2011, Medical care.

[7]  A. Garg,et al.  Impact of contraindications, barriers to self-care and support on incident peritoneal dialysis utilization. , 2010, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[8]  E. Elm,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, The Lancet.

[9]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[11]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. , 2002, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[12]  D. Lamping,et al.  Clinical outcomes and Quality of Life in Elderly Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis versus Hemodialysis , 2002, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[13]  A. Levin,et al.  Comparative hospitalization of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in Canada. , 2000, Kidney international.

[14]  G. Prescott,et al.  Can we improve early mortality in patients receiving renal replacement therapy? , 2000, Kidney international.

[15]  M. Wiedemann,et al.  Healthcare systems and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapies--an international review: costs and reimbursement/funding of ESRD therapies. , 1999, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[16]  R. Wolfe,et al.  Hospitalization among United States dialysis patients: hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[17]  P. Teschan,et al.  Multicenter study of change in dialysis therapy-maintenance hemodialysis to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. , 1992, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[18]  A. Williams,et al.  Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis in the elderly. , 1990, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[19]  E. Vonesh,et al.  Comparison of Patient and Technique Survival in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (Capd) and Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Study , 1990, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[20]  R. Wrona,et al.  Quality of life in end-stage renal disease: a reexamination. , 1989, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[21]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  OUTCOME IN PATIENTS ON CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS AND HAEMODIALYSIS: 4-YEAR ANALYSIS OF A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRE STUDY , 1987, The Lancet.

[22]  C. Charytan,et al.  A comparative study of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and center hemodialysis. Efficacy, complications, and outcome in the treatment of end-stage renal disease. , 1986, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  N. Kutner,et al.  Quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  D. A. Duncan,et al.  Hospitalization in dialysis patients. , 1984, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[25]  M. Pauly,et al.  Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: preliminary evidence in the debate over efficacy and cost. , 1983, Health affairs.

[26]  S. Pocock,et al.  [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]. , 2008, Revista espanola de salud publica.

[27]  J. Walls,et al.  A selection adjusted comparison of hospitalization on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  Multi-centre study on outcome of treatment in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis. , 1987, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.