Optimal scanning technique to cover the whole breast using an automated breast volume scanner

PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess the scanning technique for covering the whole breast using a commercially available automated breast ultrasonography (US) system.Materials and methodsA total of 40 patients in the supine position underwent automated breast US (ABVS: Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA, USA) and hand-held US. The scanning included sequential scans in the upper-outer, lower-outer, lower-inner, and upper-inner regions. After scanning all four segments of each breast using ABVS, hand-held US was performed in all the patients. The detectability of the lesions using the ABVS technique compared with that using the handheld US was evaluated. The average scanning time was compared between any two of the three examiners with various lengths of experience in breast US.ResultsIn all, 61 lesions were detected by hand-held US. The average size of the lesions was 7.7 mm (range 2.5–26.0 mm). The number of detected lesions by ABVS was consistent with those found by hand-held US in each patient. The average total scanning time for each examiner using ABVS was 10.9, 11.1, and 11.5 min, respectively. No significant difference was found in the total scanning time between any two of the three examiners.ConclusionThe four-scans technique for the major segments of the breast is thought to be an operator-independent, feasible method for performing automated breast US.

[1]  D E Dick,et al.  Ultrasound of the whole breast utilizing a dedicated automated breast scanner. , 1980, Radiology.

[2]  Automated sonomammographic‐xeromammographic‐pathologic correlations in the assessment of carcinoma of the breast. , 1982, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  R. Egan,et al.  Detection of breast carcinoma: comparison of automated water-path whole-breast sonography, mammography, and physical examination. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  V. Jackson,et al.  Automated breast sonography using a 7.5-MHz PVDF transducer: preliminary clinical evaluation. Work in progress. , 1986, Radiology.

[5]  L. Bassett,et al.  Automated and hand-held breast US: effect on patient management. , 1987, Radiology.

[6]  Hand‐held and automated sonomammography. Clinical role relative to X‐ray mammography. , 1989, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  J B Davey,et al.  Breast diseases: color Doppler US in differential diagnosis. , 1993, Radiology.

[8]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[9]  S. Raza,et al.  Solid breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US. , 1997, Radiology.

[10]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. , 1999, Radiology.

[11]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer. a systematic review. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[12]  T. Matsumura,et al.  Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. , 2006, Radiology.

[13]  R Janka,et al.  Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study. , 2008, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.