Using Computers to Enhance Peer-assessment Activities: Towards a Flexible e-Assessment System

Since the beginning of the 21 st century, the learning process has changed from being repetitive to a new form of learning based on understanding, independency, learners’ empowerment and skills improvement. As a main part of this learning process assessment is no more considered to discriminate between students, rather than it is used to enhance students learning and encourage them for further progress and success. In this new culture of assessment, teachers are no more considered to be knowledge carriers which they had to transfer to students’ heads. Instead of that, students play major roles in assessment where new forms of assessment such as self-, and peer-assessment have been adapted. In this paper, we will address an enhanced approach of web-based peerassessment for short free text answers. This approach is supposed to motivate students to participate in the assessment process, provide them with added value learning, as well as to maintain the reliability of the peer-assessment results. An experiment using this webbased system was conducted and valuable results were found.

[1]  Edward F. Gehringer,et al.  Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses , 2001, SIGCSE '01.

[2]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  The design and application of a web-based self- and peer-assessment system , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Elizabeth A. Eschenbach,et al.  Web Based Forms For Design Team Peer Evaluations , 1998 .

[4]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  The Comprehensive Assessment Of Team Member Effectiveness: A New Peer Evaluation Instrument , 2006 .

[5]  Edward F. Gehringer,et al.  Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review , 2000, 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135).

[6]  T Downing,et al.  Learning by cooperative publishing on the World-Wide Web , 1997 .

[7]  Roy Rada,et al.  Collaborative learning and the MUCH system , 1993 .

[8]  Shyan-Ming Yuan,et al.  Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[9]  K. Topping Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility , 2003 .

[10]  F. Dochy,et al.  Assessment as a tool for learning , 1997 .

[11]  Glenn Regehr,et al.  Measuring Self-assessment: Current State of the Art , 2002, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[12]  Anahí Gallardo Velázquez,et al.  Conference , 1969, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Jo McKenzie,et al.  SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  G. Dunnington,et al.  Peer and self assessment during problem-based tutorials. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[15]  K. Topping,et al.  Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students , 2000 .

[16]  S. Trahasch,et al.  Towards a flexible peer assessment system , 2004, Information Technology Based Proceedings of the FIfth International Conference onHigher Education and Training, 2004. ITHET 2004..

[17]  Paul Brna,et al.  The Missing Peer , Artificial Peers and the Enhancement of Human-Human Collaborative Student Modelling , 1999 .