Feasibility of Fault Exclusion Related to Advanced RAIM for GNSS Spoofing Detection

This paper will present an exercise to verify the usefulness of statistical testing of measurement residuals of an overdetermined position solution followed by measurement subset selection for spoofing detection and mitigation for certain spoofing events, to be especially beneficial when multi-GNSS is considered. Tests include utilizing dynamic GPS spoofing data from the TEXBAT testing battery. We will present that Advanced RAIM (Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring) has benefits for spoof detection. RAIM is designed to catch inconsistencies in range measurements and is thus useful in defeating a surreptitious lift off spoofing attack. Inconsistencies in a lift off attack exist when the spoof signal mixes with the genuine signal of similar power levels (within a few dB). The mixing creates some measurements from genuine signals and some from the spoofed signals. ARAIM cannot however mitigate across all categories of spoofers and hence should not represent a standalone spoofing solution. Although preand post-correlation signal processing is definitely the most efficient way to detect and mitigate spoofing effects, checking the measurements in the navigation domain is not a lost cause, as presented herein.

[1]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  An Evaluation of the Vestigial Signal Defense for Civil GPS Anti-Spoofing , 2011 .

[2]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  Civilian GPS Spoofing Detection based on Dual- Receiver Correlation of Military Signals , 2011 .

[3]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  The Texas Spoofing Test Battery: Toward a Standard for Evaluating GPS Signal Authentication Techniques , 2012 .

[4]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  GNSS Spoofing, Jamming, and Multipath Interference Classification using a Maximum-Likelihood Multi-Tap Multipath Estimator , 2017 .

[5]  Esteban Garbin Manfredini Signal processing techniques for GNSS anti-spoofing algorithms , 2017 .

[6]  R. G. Johnston,et al.  Think GPS offers high security? Think again. , 2004 .

[7]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  Real‐Time GPS Spoofing Detection via Correlation of Encrypted Signals , 2013 .

[8]  Fabio Dovis,et al.  Vestigial signal defense through signal quality monitoring techniques based on joint use of two metrics , 2014, 2014 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium - PLANS 2014.

[9]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  The GPS Assimilator: a Method for Upgrading Existing GPS User Equipment to Improve Accuracy, Robustness, and Resistance to Spoofing , 2010 .

[10]  Beatrice Motella,et al.  Post-correlation signal analysis to detect spoofing attacks in GNSS receivers , 2016, 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[11]  Ciro Gioia,et al.  GNSS Reliability Testing in Signal-Degraded Scenario , 2013 .

[12]  Juliette Marais,et al.  Evaluation and Comparison of GNSS Navigation Algorithms including FDE for Urban Transport Applications , 2017 .

[13]  Daniele Borio,et al.  A sum-of-squares approach to GNSS spoofing detection , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  Letizia Lo Presti,et al.  On the Use of a Signal Quality Index Applying at Tracking Stage Level to Assist the RAIM System of a GNSS Receiver , 2016, Sensors.

[15]  Heidi Kuusniemi,et al.  Reliability testing for multiple GNSS measurement outlier detection , 2016, 2016 European Navigation Conference (ENC).

[16]  Andrew Simsky,et al.  The Triple-frequency Multi-system RTK Engine for Challenging Environments , 2014 .

[17]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  GNSS Spoofing Detection Using Two-Antenna Differential Carrier Phase , 2014 .

[18]  Salvatore Troisi,et al.  P-RANSAC: An Integrity Monitoring Approach for GNSS Signal Degraded Scenario , 2014 .

[19]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  Practical cryptographic civil GPS signal authentication , 2011 .

[20]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  GNSS Spoofing and Detection , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  Sanjeev Gunawardena,et al.  Detailed Analysis of the TEXBAT Datasets Using a High Fidelity Software GPS Receiver , 2016 .

[22]  J Blanch,et al.  RAIM with Optimal Integrity and Continuity Allocations Under Multiple Failures , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[23]  Juan Blanch,et al.  Advanced RAIM user Algorithm Description: Integrity Support Message Processing, Fault Detection, Exclusion, and Protection Level Calculation , 2012 .

[24]  T. Humphreys,et al.  Assessing the Spoofing Threat: Development of a Portable GPS Civilian Spoofer , 2008 .

[25]  W. Baarda,et al.  A testing procedure for use in geodetic networks. , 1968 .

[26]  Per Enge,et al.  Exclusion for Advanced RAIM : Requirements and a Baseline Algorithm , 2014 .

[27]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  A Proposed Navigation Message Authentication Implementation for Civil GPS Anti-Spoofing , 2011 .

[28]  Heidi Kuusniemi,et al.  User-Level Reliability and Quality Monitoring in Satellite-Based Personal Navigation , 2005 .

[29]  Per Enge,et al.  Fast Multiple Fault Exclusion with a Large Number of Measurements , 2015 .

[30]  Heidi Kuusniemi,et al.  A multi-GNSS software-defined receiver: design, implementation, and performance benefits , 2016, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[31]  Per Enge,et al.  Demonstrating ARAIM on UAS using Software Defined Radio and Civilian Signal GPS L1/L2C and GLONASS G1/G2 , 2016 .