Clinical impact of margin reduction on late toxicity and short-term biochemical control for patients treated with daily on-line image guided IMRT for prostate cancer.

To evaluate the impact of PTV reduction when delivering image-guided IMRT (IG-IMRT) for patients with prostate cancer. Between 2001 and 2007, 165 men were treated with daily IG-IMRT using a 3D ultrasound-based system. Median dose prescribed to the prostate was 78 Gy [74 Gy-78 Gy]. Patients were stratified regarding the CTV to the PTV margin: group A (n=87)=5mm or group B (n=78)=10mm. Late toxicity was scored using the CTC v3.0 scale. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) was calculated using the Phoenix definition. Grade 2 genitourinary toxicity was 7.0% for group A and 6.6% for group B (p=1.00). Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity was 1.2% and 2.6% (p=0.38). With a median follow-up of 38.3 months [5.25-87.3], bPFS at 3 years was 92.5% [82.4%-96.9%] in group A and 94.3% [85.5%-97.8%] in group B (p=0.84). IG-IMRT yielded very low rates of late toxicity. Margin had impact neither on short-term bPFS nor late toxicity.

[1]  C C Ling,et al.  Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  J. Lebesque,et al.  Role of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in reducing toxicity in dose escalation for localized prostate cancer. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  I. Barillot,et al.  Clinical assessment of the use of the Sonarray system for daily prostate localization. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  John Staffurth,et al.  A comparison of CT- and ultrasound-based imaging to localize the prostate for external beam radiotherapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Tim Craig,et al.  Target and Organ Motion Considerations , 2008 .

[6]  N. Lumen,et al.  Urinary toxicity after high dose intensity modulated radiotherapy as primary therapy for prostate cancer. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Evaluation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for image-guided radiotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Clifton D Fuller,et al.  Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods: Implications for image-guided radiotherapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  W. De Neve,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: late morbidity and results on biochemical control. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. , 2003, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[11]  R. Bristow,et al.  A phase II study of localized prostate cancer treated to 75.6 Gy with 3D conformal radiotherapy. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Michael J. Zelefsky,et al.  High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Yoshiya Yamada,et al.  Ultra-high dose (86.4 Gy) IMRT for localized prostate cancer: toxicity and biochemical outcomes. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Impact of image guidance on outcomes after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  David A. Jaffray,et al.  Image-Guided Radiation Therapy of Prostate Cancer , 2008 .