Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery: Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine

In this randomized, double-blinded study we sought to assess the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combination with sufentanil and the efficacy of ropivacaine alone after major abdominal surgery. Sixty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery received standardized general anesthesia combined with epidural thoracic analgesia. They were allocated to one of three groups: the BS group received postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.125% bupivacaine plus 0.5 &mgr;g/mL sufentanil; the RS group received 0.125% ropivacaine plus 0.5 &mgr;g/mL sufentanil; and the R group received 0.2% ropivacaine, with the patient-controlled epidural analgesia device set at bolus 2–3 mL and background infusion 3–5 mL/h. Visual analog scale scores were significantly lower during coughing in the BS group compared with the RS and R groups and in the RS group compared with the R group. The BS group required significantly less local anesthetic (milligrams per day) during the first three postoperative days compared with the RS and R groups, and the RS group, significantly less than the R group. No major side effects were noted in any group. We conclude that, after major abdominal surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia was more effective with bupivacaine than with ropivacaine when these two local anesthetics are used in a mixture with sufentanil. Ropivacaine alone was less effective than ropivacaine in combination with sufentanil.

[1]  H. Buerkle,et al.  What Concentration of Sufentanil Should be Combined with Ropivacaine 0.2% wt/vol for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia? , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[2]  R. Gaver,et al.  A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia with 0.125% Ropivacaine with Fentanyl Versus 0.125% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl during Labor , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  C. Mann,et al.  Comparison of Intravenous or Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia in the Elderly after Major Abdominal Surgery , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[4]  J. Wetterslev,et al.  Effect of continuous epidural 0.2% ropivacaine vs 0.2% bupivacaine on postoperative pain, motor block and gastrointestinal function after abdominal hysterectomy. , 2000, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  M. Paech,et al.  A comparison of epidural ropivacaine infusion alone and in combination with 1, 2, and 4 microg/mL fentanyl for seventy-two hours of postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  G. Lyons,et al.  Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour. , 1999, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  Spencer S. Liu,et al.  Comparison of three solutions of ropivacaine/fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[8]  J. Eisenach,et al.  0.125% Ropivacaine Is Similar to 0.125% Bupivacaine for Labor Analgesia Using Patient-Controlled Epidural Infusion , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  Spencer S. Liu,et al.  Patient‐controlled Epidural Analgesia with Bupivacaine and Fentanyl on Hospital Wards: Prospective Experience with 1,030 Surgical Patients , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[10]  M. Columb,et al.  Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: implications for therapeutic indexes. , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[11]  G. Brodner,et al.  The Effects of Adding Sufentanil to Bupivacaine for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  W. Beattie,et al.  Continuous Epidural Ropivacaine 0.2% for Analgesia After Lower Abdominal Surgery , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  J. Tamargo,et al.  Stereoselective block of cardiac sodium channels by bupivacaine in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. , 1995, Circulation.

[14]  D. Scott,et al.  Epidural Ropivacaine Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia After Major Lower Abdominal Surgery--A Dose Finding Study , 1995, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[15]  R. Thirlby,et al.  Effects of Perioperative Analgesic Technique on Rate of Recovery after Colon Surgery , 1995, Anesthesiology.

[16]  J. Neal,et al.  Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia: Their Role in Postoperative Outcome , 1995, Anesthesiology.

[17]  F. Reynolds,et al.  Extradural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a double-blind comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine with 0.5% bupivacaine. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  J. Wildsmith,et al.  Efficacy and kinetics of extradural ropivacaine: comparison with bupivacaine. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.

[19]  G. Strichartz,et al.  Stereoselective inhibition of neuronal sodium channels by local anesthetics. Evidence for two sites of action? , 1992, Anesthesiology.

[20]  G. Thompson,et al.  Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery. , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[21]  Alistair Lee,et al.  Acute Toxicity of Ropivacaine Compared with That of Bupivacaine , 1989, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[22]  G. Johansson,et al.  Cardiotoxicity of ropivacaine – a new amide local anaesthetic agent , 1989, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[23]  B. Akerman,et al.  Primary evaluation of the local anaesthetic properties of the amino amide agent ropivacaine (LEA 103) , 1988, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[24]  P. Bromage A Comparison of the Hydrochloride and Carbon Dioxide Salts of Lidocaine and Prilocaine in Epidural Analgesia , 1965, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[25]  G. Fanelli,et al.  Patient supplemented epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery with bupivacaine/fentanyl or ropivacaine/fentanyl , 2000, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[26]  H. Buerkle,et al.  Epidural analgesia with local anesthetics after abdominal surgery: earlier motor recovery with 0.2% ropivacaine than 0.175% bupivacaine. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[27]  H. Buerkle,et al.  Epidural Analgesia with Local Anesthetics After Abdominal Surgery , 1999 .

[28]  H. Kehlet The stress response to surgery: release mechanisms and the modifying effect of pain relief. , 1989, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum.