What Interactivity Means to the User Essential Insights into and a Scale for Perceived Interactivity

The selection and use of media depend largely on how users perceive such media. A central aspect of the “new media” is their interactivity, but how users perceive this phenomenon has rarely been researched. This study provides an in-depth investigation into the perception component of interactivity and develops a compact scale for its measurement. According to psychological approaches, practical uses (affordances) – not physical or technical characteristics – guide perception. While existing scales mostly measure whether the “interactive” technical features of devices or websites are noticed, our instrument is based on the affordances that interactivity provides. Consequently, a new research design, the use-identified meaning, was implemented. This is the first study on interactivity that empirically examines a wide range of Internet-based services, thus meeting the broad ambit of interactivity. Our results generally validate the existing constructs, which are largely based on technical characteristics, yet provide additional insights into the relevant contexts and the subjective significance of different aspects of interactivity.

[1]  María Sicilia,et al.  EFFECTS OF INTERACTIVITY IN A WEB SITE: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognition , 2005 .

[2]  Byung-Kwan Lee,et al.  Dimensions of Interactivity: Differential Effects of Social and Psychological Factors , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Wolfgang Schweiger,et al.  Interaktivität ten years after. Bestandsaufnahme und Analyserahmen , 2006 .

[4]  John A. Courtright,et al.  Normative Images of Communication Media Mass and Interpersonal Channels in the New Media Environment , 1993 .

[5]  Brian L. Massey,et al.  Interactivity, Online Journalism, and English-Language Web Newspapers in Asia , 1999 .

[6]  Guohua Wu,et al.  The Mediating Role of Perceived Interactivity in the Effect of Actual Interactivity on Attitude Toward the Website , 2005 .

[7]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Theorizing Interactivity's Effects , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[8]  Wei-Na Lee,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Interactivity , 2002 .

[9]  B. Calder,et al.  New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising , 1998 .

[10]  Marta Sadurní,et al.  The ontogenesis of meaning: An interactional approach , 1999 .

[11]  Wei-Na Lee,et al.  A Comparison of Objective Characteristics and User Perception of Web Sites , 2004 .

[12]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[13]  Sally J. McMillan.  Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems , 2002 .

[14]  D. Leontiev.  Three Facets of Meaning , 2005 .

[15]  Wolfgang Schweiger,et al.  Interaktivität - ten years after , 2006 .

[16]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Interactivity-as-Product and Interactivity-as-Process , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[17]  Jens F. Jensen,et al.  Interactivity: Tracking a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies , 1998 .

[18]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Technology: The New Media in Society , 1986 .

[19]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Internet use in the contemporary media environment. , 2001 .

[20]  P. Vorderer,et al.  Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal. , 2000 .

[21]  Philomen Schonhagen.  Soziale Kommunikation im Internet : zur Theorie und Systematik computervermittelter Kommunikation vor dem Hintergrund der Kommunikationsgeschichte , 2004 .

[22]  Sally J. McMillan.  A four-part model of cyber-interactivity , 2002, New Media Soc..

[23]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[24]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  Content and context: an exploration of the basic characteristics of information needs , 2002, New Media Soc..

[25]  K. Jensen.  Interactivity in the Wild , 2005 .

[26]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[27]  Spiro Kiousis,et al.  Interactivity: a concept explication , 2002, New Media Soc..

[28]  J. Newhagen,et al.  Nightly@nbc.com: Audience Scope and the Perception of Interactivity in Viewer Mail on the Internet. , 1995 .

[29]  Yuping Liu,et al.  Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[30]  M. Schuemie.  Presence: Interacting in VR? , 1999 .

[31]  J. Belsky,et al.  From exploration to play: A cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior. , 1981 .

[32]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[33]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[34]  C. Heeter.  Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experiences , 2000 .

[35]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Attitude Toward the Site , 1999 .

[36]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Networked Interactivity , 1997, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity , 2002 .

[38]  R. LaRose,et al.  A Social Cognitive Theory of Internet Uses and Gratifications: Toward a New Model of Media Attendance , 2004 .

[39]  C. Jung.  Archetyp und Unbewusstes , 1984 .

[40]  Rudy Bretz,et al.  Media for Interactive Communication , 1983 .

[41]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Interactivity in Society: Locating an Elusive Concept , 2004, Inf. Soc..