Wavelet-based image processing for digital mammography

This paper is to evaluate the importance of image preprocessing using multiresolution and multiorientation wavelet transforms on the performance of a previously reported computer assisted diagnostic (CAD) method for breast cancer screening, using digital mammography. An analysis of the influence of WTs on image feature extraction for mass detection is achieved by comparing the discriminate ability of features extracted with and without wavelet based image preprocessing using computed ROC. Three indexes are proposed to assess the segmentation of the mass area with comparison to ground truth. Dat was analyzed on region-of- interest database that included mass and normal regions from digitized mammograms with ground truth. The metrics for measurement of segmentation of the mass clearly demonstrates the importance of image preprocessing methods. Similarly, the relative improvement in performance is observed in feature extraction, where the Az values are increased. The improvement depends on the feature characteristics. The use of methodology in this paper result sin a significant improvement in feature extraction for the previously proposed CAD detection method. We are therefore exploring additional improvement in wavelet based image preprocessing methods, including adaptive methods, to achieve a further improvement in performance on larger image databases.

[1]  Martin D. Fox,et al.  Classifying mammographic lesions using computerized image analysis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  Wei Qian,et al.  Wavelet-based neural network with fuzzy-logic adaptivity for nuclear image restoration , 1996 .

[4]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  Baoyu Zheng,et al.  Application of wavelet transform for image enhancement in medical imaging , 1994 .

[6]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  T K Lau,et al.  Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[8]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  Guido Maria te Brake Computer aided detection of masses in digital mammograms , 2000 .

[11]  D Brzakovic,et al.  An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[12]  M A Helvie,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: classification of mass and normal tissue by texture analysis , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  I Andersson,et al.  Chapter IV. Reduced breast‐cancer mortality with mammography screening‐an assessment of currently available data , 1990, International journal of cancer. Supplement = Journal international du cancer. Supplement.

[14]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Investigation of methods for the computerized detection and analysis of mammographic masses , 1990, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[15]  Vijay K. Jain,et al.  Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[16]  Jian Fan,et al.  Mammographic feature enhancement by multiscale analysis , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[17]  L P Clarke,et al.  Digital mammography: computer-assisted diagnosis method for mass detection with multiorientation and multiresolution wavelet transforms. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[18]  Nuggehally Sampath Jayant,et al.  An adaptive clustering algorithm for image segmentation , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[19]  S. Lai,et al.  On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[20]  R. Clark,et al.  Economic issues in screening mammography. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  P. Undrill,et al.  The use of texture analysis to delineate suspicious masses in mammography. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.