Technology choice and timing with positive network effects

Abstract When two competing and incompatible products coexist in a market, potential users face a choice between the two products and the alternative of deferring the decision. This paper examines the choice between the two substitutes, where each one is subject to a positive network effect. That is, a user of one of the products experiences an increase in the value for each additional person using the same product. We examine this buy or wait problem, either for an individual or a manager making the investment on behalf of a firm, by formulating and analyzing a decision-theoretic model. To model the stochastic evolution of market share, we build on the generalized Polya urn of Arthur et al. [Arthur, W.B., Ermoliev, Y.M., Kaniovski, Y.M., 1987. Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure. European Journal Of Operational Research 30 (3), 294–303], allowing for composition of the market to affect not just the relative market shares but also the absolute growth rate of the market. We show that the optimal strategy is defined by a pair of market penetration thresholds that depend on the market composition. Looking at the effect of the network effects on the optimal strategy, we find that more pronounced network effects can either raise or lower the penetration thresholds.

[1]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[2]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[3]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Research in Marketing , 1982 .

[4]  R. Jensen,et al.  Adoption and diffusion of an innovation of uncertain profitability , 1982 .

[5]  Yves Balcer,et al.  Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology , 1984 .

[6]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Dale A. Stirling,et al.  Information rules , 2003, SGMD.

[9]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior 1 , 2008 .

[10]  Mark S. Granovetter,et al.  Threshold models of diffusion and collective behavior , 1983 .

[11]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1967 .

[12]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[13]  K. McCardle.  Information Acquisition and the Adoption of New Technology , 1985 .

[14]  G. Pólya,et al.  Über die Statistik verketteter Vorgänge , 1923 .

[15]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 2 , 1967 .

[16]  Suresh K. Nair,et al.  Timing replacement decisions under discontinuous technological change , 1991 .

[17]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[18]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[19]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure , 1987 .

[20]  Suresh K. Nair,et al.  A model for equipment replacement due to technological obsolescence , 1992 .

[21]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[22]  J. Choi.  Irreversible Choice of Uncertain Technologies with Network Externalities , 1994 .