The nature of fourth graders' understandings of electric circuits

The purpose of this study was to interpret the nature of fourth graders' understandings of electric circuits. The qualitative study was guided by constructivist theory and utilized two small groups of four children each. Each child was interviewed prior to and after, as well as observed throughout, the instructional unit on simple electric circuits. The interviews centered around three different electric circuit tasks: predictions and explanations of eight electric circuit problems: the completion and explanation of three electric circuit drawings; and the identification of an electric current diagram, which was based on Osborne's (1983) work. The findings for these children suggested that: (1) the nature of children's understandings of electric circuits is dependent upon the interplay between their understandings of circuit connections and understandings of electric current; (2) prior to instruction children's understandings of electric circuits were scientifically inaccurate and tended to emphasize understandings of circuit connections; (3) children held multiple understandings of electric current prior to instruction, whereas following instruction most children held a single understanding of electric current, albeit scientifically inaccurate; and (4) after instruction children demonstrated a more accurate technical understanding of electric circuits, but only one child demonstrated a scientific understanding of electric current. Based on these findings, conclusions about knowledge restructuring are presented, as well as implications for teaching, assessment, and research. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  M. Wittrock Learning as a Generative Process , 1974 .

[2]  John R. Anderson Cognitive psychology and its implications, 2nd ed. , 1985 .

[3]  James P. Byrnes,et al.  Formal operations: A systematic reformulation , 1988 .

[4]  W. Brewer,et al.  Theories of Knowledge Restructuring in Development , 1987 .

[5]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[6]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[7]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[8]  J. Byrnes What's left is closer to right: A response to keating , 1988 .

[9]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning science: A generative process , 1983 .

[10]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[11]  J. Lochhead,et al.  Student conceptions of simple circuits , 1980 .

[12]  Elizabeth Engel Clough,et al.  Secondary Students' Conceptions of the Conduction of Heat: Bringing Together Scientific and Personal Views. , 1985 .

[13]  J. Hiebert Conceptual and procedural knowledge : the case of mathematics , 1987 .

[14]  Samuel Johsua Students’ interpretation of simple electrical diagrams , 1984 .

[15]  The pupils’ view of electricity , 1985 .

[16]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[17]  Roger Osborne,et al.  Towards Modifying Children's Ideas about Electric Current , 1983 .

[18]  David Shipstone,et al.  A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits , 1984 .