Improving Detection of Rare Biological Events in High-Throughput Screens

The success of high-throughput screening (HTS) strategies depends on the effectiveness of both normalization methods and study design. We report comparisons among normalization methods in two titration series experiments. We also extend the results in a third experiment with two differently designed but otherwise identical screens: compounds in replicate plates were either placed in the same well locations or were randomly assigned to different locations. Best results were obtained when randomization was combined with normalization methods that corrected for within-plate spatial bias. We conclude that potent, reliable, and accurate HTS requires replication, randomization design strategies, and more extensive normalization than is typically done and that formal statistical testing is desirable. The Statistics and dIagnostic Graphs for HTS (SIGHTS) Microsoft Excel Add-In software is available to conduct most analyses reported here.

[1]  Martin J. Pfeifer,et al.  Long-Term Storage of Compound Solutions for High-Throughput Screening by Using a Novel 1536-Well Microplate , 2009, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[2]  Bert Gunter,et al.  Improved Statistical Methods for Hit Selection in High-Throughput Screening , 2003, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[3]  J A Hanley,et al.  Sampling variability of nonparametric estimates of the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves: an update. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[4]  R. Nadon,et al.  Inferential literacy for experimental high-throughput biology. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  Susanne Heynen-Genel,et al.  Optimization and Application of Median Filter Corrections to Relieve Diverse Spatial Patterns in Microtiter Plate Data , 2011, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[6]  Laurence Lafanechère.  Chemogenomics and cancer chemotherapy: cell-based assays to screen for small molecules that impair microtubule dynamics. , 2008, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[7]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[8]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale , 2010, Nature Methods.

[9]  Michael Boutros,et al.  The art and design of genetic screens: RNA interference , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[10]  Robert Nadon,et al.  Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  Robert Nadon,et al.  An efficient method for the detection and elimination of systematic error in high-throughput screening , 2007, Bioinform..

[12]  Laurence Lafanechère,et al.  Azaindole derivatives are inhibitors of microtubule dynamics, with anti‐cancer and anti‐angiogenic activities , 2013, British journal of pharmacology.

[13]  Dongmei Liu,et al.  Quantitative assessment of hit detection and confirmation in single and duplicate high-throughput screenings. , 2008, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[14]  Lorenz M Mayr,et al.  Novel trends in high-throughput screening. , 2009, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[15]  C. Murray,et al.  The rise of fragment-based drug discovery. , 2009, Nature chemistry.

[16]  Olga Vitek,et al.  Noise reduction in genome-wide perturbation screens using linear mixed-effect models , 2011, Bioinform..

[17]  Thomas D. Y. Chung,et al.  A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays , 1999, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[18]  Amy M. Wiles,et al.  An Analysis of Normalization Methods for Drosophila RNAi Genomic Screens and Development of a Robust Validation Scheme , 2008, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[19]  U. Eggert.  The why and how of phenotypic small-molecule screens. , 2013, Nature chemical biology.

[20]  Gavin Harper,et al.  Process Validation and Screen Reproducibility in High-Throughput Screening , 2009, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[21]  Robert Nadon,et al.  Single assay-wide variance experimental (SAVE) design for high-throughput screening , 2013, Bioinform..

[22]  Laurence Lafanechère,et al.  Miniaturization and Validation of a Sensitive Multiparametric Cell-Based Assay for the Concomitant Detection of Microtubule-Destabilizing and Microtubule-Stabilizing Agents , 2006, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[23]  Richard Simon,et al.  A random variance model for detection of differential gene expression in small microarray experiments , 2003, Bioinform..

[24]  R. Andersen,et al.  Cell-based screen for antimitotic agents and identification of analogues of rhizoxin, eleutherobin, and paclitaxel in natural extracts. , 2000, Cancer research.

[25]  Adam Yasgar,et al.  Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R , 2005, Bioinform..

[27]  Screening we can believe in. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[28]  John D. Storey.  A direct approach to false discovery rates , 2002 .

[29]  Jing Liu,et al.  Experimental Design and Statistical Methods for Improved Hit Detection in High-Throughput Screening , 2010, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[30]  Martin Serrano,et al.  Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published October 18, 2007 ChemBank: a small-molecule screening and , 2007 .