Geomagnetic field variations at the equatorial electrojet station in Sri Lanka, Peredinia

The paper discusses the variations of the horizontal ( H ), vertical ( Z ) and eastward ( Y ) components of the geomagnetic field at Peredinia (PRD), an electrojet station in Sri Lanka, with the time of the day, season, sudden commencement (SSC) and during geomagnetic storms. The daily variation of H showed a large peak around midday. The daily variation of Z appeared to be almost a time gradient curve of the daily variation of H , showing a maximum around 09:00 LT (75° EMT) when the H field was increasing fastest and not at noon when Δ H was the maximum. Storm time variation of H resembled the variation of the D st index but that of Z showed a large minimum about 2-3h before the time of minimum D st or at the time of maximum time gradient of D st variation. These features are compared with corresponding variations at the equatorial stations Trivandrum (TRD) in India, and remarkable similarity in all observations is noticed at PRD and TRD. It is suggested that the observed abnormal features of Z variations at electrojet stations in India-Sri Lanka are due to (i) direct effect of the ionospheric electrojet current (ii) the induction effect of the image current by the average spatially extended conductivity region and (iii) the induction current in the local subsurface conductor. It is suggested that the conductor responsible for the observed features in Z in India and Sri Lanka has to have extended spatial domain to latitudes well south of India, rather than confined to narrow Palk Strait.

[1]  R. G. Rastogi.  Electromagnetic induction by the equatorial electrojet , 2004 .

[2]  R. G. Rastogi.  Electromagnetic induction due to SSC at equatorial electrojet stations , 1999 .

[3]  K. Kunaratnam.  Short-period geomagnetic variations at two stations in Sri Lanka and their relation to channelling of induced currents through a conducting region beneath the Palk Strait , 1987 .

[4]  R. Singh,et al.  Induction models of southern India and the effect of off-shore geology , 1987 .

[5]  D. Jayakumar,et al.  Proposed relation between anomalous geomagnetic variations and the tectonic history of South India , 1981 .

[6]  B. Singh,et al.  Induction at short periods in the horizontal field variations in the Indian peninsula , 1977 .

[7]  H. Chandra,et al.  EQUATORIAL IONOSPHERIC DRIFT AND THE ELECTROJET. , 1971 .

[8]  R. G. Rastogi,et al.  The disappearance of equatorial Es and the reversal of electrojet current , 1971 .

[9]  Ronald F. Woodman,et al.  Vertical drift velocities and east‐west electric fields at the magnetic equator , 1970 .

[10]  A. Onwumechilli,et al.  Recent measurements of the magnetic field of the equatorial electrojet in Nigeria , 1963 .

[11]  P. Hariharan,et al.  Diurnal Magnetic variations near the Magnetic Equator , 1953, MAUSAM.

[12]  S. Chapman.  The equatorial electrojet as detected from the abnormal electric current distribution above Huancayo, Peru, and elsewhere , 1951 .

[13]  J. Egedal.  The magnetic diurnal variation of the horizontal force near the magnetic equator , 1947 .

[14]  R. G. Rastogi,et al.  On the eastward geomagnetic field variations at electrojet stations , 2002 .

[15]  R. G. Rastogi.  Disturbance time variation of geomagnetic vertical field in the Indian equatorial electrojet , 2001 .

[16]  R. G. Rastogi.  The equatorial electrojet: magnetic and ionsopheric effects. , 1989 .

[17]  B. Singh,et al.  The induced effects of geomagnetic variations in the equatorial region , 1982 .

[18]  B. Singh,et al.  Effect of the presence of a conducting channel between India and Sri Lanka Island on the features of the equatorial electrojet , 1979 .

[19]  S. Forbush,et al.  Equatorial electrojet in Peru , 1961 .