UC Office of the President Recent Work Title An efficient measure of compactness for two-dimensional shapes and its application in regionalization problems Permalink

A measure of shape compactness is a numerical quantity representing the degree to which a shape is compact. Ways to provide an accurate measure have been given great attention due to its application in a broad range of GIS problems, such as detecting clustering patterns from remote-sensing images, understanding urban sprawl, and redrawing electoral districts to avoid gerrymandering. In this article, we propose an effective and efficient approach to computing shape compactness based on the moment of inertia (MI), a well-known concept in physics. The mathematical framework and the computer implementation for both raster and vector models are discussed in detail. In addition to computing compactness for a single shape, we propose a computational method that is capable of calculating the variations in compactness as a shape grows or shrinks, which is a typical application found in regionalization problems. We conducted a number of experiments that demonstrate the superiority of the MI over the popular isoperimetric quotient approach in terms of (1) computational efficiency; (2) tolerance of positional uncertainty and irregular boundaries; (3) ability to handle shapes with holes and multiple parts; and (4) applicability and efficacy in districting/zonation/regionalization problems.

[1]  Roberto Bachi,et al.  New Methods of Geostatistical Analysis and Graphical Presentation: Distributions of Populations over Territories , 1999 .

[2]  Shuqing Zhang,et al.  Vector analysis theory on landscape pattern (VATLP) , 2006 .

[3]  R. Stough,et al.  Measuring Similarity Among Various Shapes Based on Geometric Matching , 2005 .

[4]  Katherine Ralls,et al.  Stable isotopes evaluate exploitation of anthropogenic foods by the endangered San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) , 2010 .

[5]  Ernest C. Reock join A Note: Measuring Compactness as a Requirement of Legislative Apportionment , 1961 .

[6]  Chul E. Kim,et al.  Digital disks and a digital compactness measure , 1984, STOC '84.

[7]  Jason Parent,et al.  Ten compactness properties of circles: measuring shape in geography , 2010 .

[8]  David H. Douglas,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR THE REDUCTION OF THE NUMBER OF POINTS REQUIRED TO REPRESENT A DIGITIZED LINE OR ITS CARICATURE , 1973 .

[9]  S Openshaw,et al.  Algorithms for Reengineering 1991 Census Geography , 1995, Environment & planning A.

[10]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  Compactness of Geographic Shape: Comparison and Evaluation of Measures , 1985 .

[11]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  Spatial Aggregation and Compactness of Census Areas with a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: A Case Study in Canada , 2012 .

[12]  J. Weaver,et al.  A Procedure for Nonpartisan Districting: Development of Computer Techniques , 1963 .

[13]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region-building, partitioning and spatial modelling , 1977 .

[14]  V. C. Miller,et al.  quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee , 1953 .

[15]  P. Eason,et al.  Optimization of territory shape in heterogeneous habitats : a field study of the red-capped cardinal (Paroaria gularis) , 1992 .

[16]  Y. Frolov MEASURING THE SHAPE OF GEOGRAPHICAL PHENOMENA: A HISTORY OF THE ISSUE , 1975 .

[17]  Thomas K. Peucker,et al.  2. Algorithms for the Reduction of the Number of Points Required to Represent a Digitized Line or its Caricature , 2011 .

[18]  J. Friedenberg,et al.  Aesthetic judgment of triangular shape: compactness and not the golden ratio determines perceived attractiveness , 2012, i-Perception.

[19]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  THE DOMESDAY MACHINE: A NATIONWIDE GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM , 1988 .

[20]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Shape Google : a computer vision approach to invariant shape retrieval , 2009 .

[21]  M.J. Bottema,et al.  Circularity of objects in images , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100).

[22]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[23]  Ernesto Bribiesca,et al.  State of the Art of Compactness and Circularity Measures 1 , 2009 .

[24]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  An Empirical Study of Some Zone-Design Criteria , 1978 .

[25]  Jonathan Corcoran,et al.  Spatial patterns of urban compactness in Melbourne: An urban myth or a reality , 2009 .

[26]  Elizabeth A. Wentz,et al.  SHAPE ANALYSIS IN GIS , 2008 .

[27]  David Martin,et al.  The Application of Zone-Design Methodology in the 2001 UK Census , 2001 .

[28]  John P. Eakins,et al.  A Visual Comparison of Shape Descriptors Using Multi-Dimensional Scaling , 2003, CAIP.

[29]  H. Young Measuring the Compactness of Legislative Districts , 1988 .

[30]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Temporal Trends In The Spatial Organization Of A Service Agency , 1971 .

[31]  Rick Gillman Geometry and Gerrymandering , 2002 .

[32]  E. Bribiesca Measuring 2D shape compactness using the contact perimeter , 1997 .

[33]  Henry F. Kaiser,et al.  An Objective Method for Establishing Legislative Districts , 1966 .

[34]  Charles R. Hampton,et al.  Practical application of district compactness , 1993 .

[35]  Alexander Wolff,et al.  Area aggregation in map generalisation by mixed-integer programming , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[36]  András Bárdossy,et al.  GIS approach to scale issues of perimeter-based shape indices for drainage basins , 2002 .

[37]  Elizabeth A. Wentz,et al.  A Shape Definition for Geographic Applications Based on Edge, Elongation, and Perforation , 2010 .

[38]  R. Osserman The isoperimetric inequality , 1978 .

[39]  Raúl Ramos Lobo,et al.  Supervised regionalization methods: A survey , 2006 .