Mutual interferences and design principles for mechatronic devices in magnetic resonance imaging

PurposeRobotic and mechatronic devices that work compatibly with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are applied in diagnostic MRI, image-guided surgery, neurorehabilitation and neuroscience. MRI-compatible mechatronic systems must address the challenges imposed by the scanner’s electromagnetic fields. We have developed objective quantitative evaluation criteria for device characteristics needed to formulate design guidelines that ensure MRI-compatibility based on safety, device functionality and image quality.MethodsThe mutual interferences between an MRI system and mechatronic devices working in its vicinity are modeled and tested. For each interference, the involved components are listed, and a numerical measure for “MRI-compatibility” is proposed. These interferences are categorized into an MRI-compatibility matrix, with each element representing possible interactions between one part of the mechatronic system and one component of the electromagnetic fields. Based on this formulation, design principles for MRI-compatible mechatronic systems are proposed. Furthermore, test methods are developed to examine whether a mechatronic device indeed works without interferences within an MRI system. Finally, the proposed MRI-compatibility criteria and design guidelines have been applied to an actual design process that has been validated by the test procedures.ResultsObjective and quantitative MRI-compatibility measures for mechatronic and robotic devices have been established. Applying the proposed design principles, potential problems in safety, device functionality and image quality can be considered in the design phase to ensure that the mechatronic system will fulfill the MRI-compatibility criteria.ConclusionNew guidelines and test procedures for MRI instrument compatibility provide a rational basis for design and evaluation of mechatronic devices in various MRI applications. Designers can apply these criteria and use the tests, so that MRI-compatibility results can accrue to build an experiential database.

[1]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Design of an MRI-compatible robotic stereotactic device for minimally invasive interventions in the breast. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  Fritz Schick,et al.  Eddy‐current induction in extended metallic parts as a source of considerable torsional moment , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  R. Riener,et al.  Comparison of MRI-Compatible Mechatronic Systems With Hydrodynamic and Pneumatic Actuation , 2008, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[4]  Kiyoyuki Chinzei,et al.  MRI-Compatible Robotics , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[5]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  Surgical assist robot for the active navigation in the intraoperative MRI: hardware design issues , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[6]  Roger Gassert.  MR-compatible robotics to investigate human motor control , 2006 .

[7]  F. Shellock,et al.  Cardiovascular catheters and accessories: Ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MRI , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  R. Riener,et al.  fMRI-Compatible Electromagnetic Haptic Interface , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[9]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Regularized fieldmap estimation in MRI , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[10]  D B Plewes,et al.  Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  P. Pietrini,et al.  Sensing Glove for Brain Studies: Design and Assessment of Its Compatibility for fMRI With a Robust Test , 2008, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[12]  Martin J. Graves,et al.  MRI from Picture to Proton , 2017 .

[13]  D W McRobbie,et al.  Effectiveness and relevance of MR acceptance testing: results of an 8 year audit. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  Akio Yamamoto,et al.  Actuation Methods for Applications in MR Environments , 2006 .

[15]  J. Schenck.  The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[16]  E. Burdet,et al.  Sensors for Applications in Magnetic Resonance Environments , 2008, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[17]  Brian M Dale,et al.  Improvement in B1‐inhomogeneity artifacts in the abdomen at 3T MR imaging using a radiofrequency cushion , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  E. Burdet,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges in MR-Compatible Robotics , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[19]  Roger Christoph Lüchinger,et al.  Safety aspects of cardiac pacemakers in magnetic resonance imaging , 2002 .

[20]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Sources of distortion in functional MRI data , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[21]  N J Pelc,et al.  Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: Analysis and correction , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  D. Turnbull,et al.  Sensitivity and performance time in MRI dephasing artifact reduction methods , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  C. Mavroidis,et al.  MR_CHIROD v.2: Magnetic Resonance Compatible Smart Hand Rehabilitation Device for Brain Imaging , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  R. Riener,et al.  Review on MR-Compatible Robotic Systems , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[25]  Dominique Chapuis,et al.  Application of ultrasonic motors to MR-compatible haptic interfaces , 2009 .

[26]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Pacing in magnetic resonance imaging environment: clinical and technical considerations on compatibility. , 2001, European heart journal.

[27]  Fritz Schick,et al.  Heating of metallic implants and instruments induced by gradient switching in a 1.5-Tesla whole-body unit. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  R. Gassert,et al.  Investigation of a Cable Transmission for the Actuation of MR Compatible Haptic Interfaces , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[29]  D Stoianovici,et al.  Multi‐imager compatible actuation principles in surgical robotics , 2005, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[30]  Antero Koivula.  Magnetic resonance image distortions due to artificial macroscopic objects : an example: correction of image distortion caused by an artificial hip prosthesis , 2002 .

[31]  R. Buchli,et al.  Heating effects of metallic implants by MRI examinations , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Image reconstruction in SNR units: A general method for SNR measurement † , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  REGULARIZED B1+ MAP ESTIMATION IN MRI , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[34]  A. Patriciu,et al.  A New Type of Motor: Pneumatic Step Motor , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[35]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  MR Compatibility of Mechatronic Devices: Design Criteria , 1999, MICCAI.

[36]  G. Schaefers,et al.  Testing MR Safety and Compatibility , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[37]  B. Condon,et al.  Investigation of the factors responsible for burns during MRI , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[38]  C J Bakker,et al.  Heating Around Intravascular Guidewires by Resonating RF Waves , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Detecting and adjusting for artifacts in fMRI time series data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[40]  Giampaolo Ferraioli,et al.  Field Map Reconstruction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Bayesian Estimation , 2009, Sensors.

[41]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  MR compatible force sensing system for real-time monitoring of wrist moments during fMRI testing , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[42]  Constantinos Mavroidis,et al.  Magnetic resonance-compatible robotic and mechatronics systems for image-guided interventions and rehabilitation: a review study. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[43]  Kiyoyuki Chinzei,et al.  Numerical simulations and lab tests for design of MR-compatible robots , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[44]  Robert Turner,et al.  Image Distortion Correction in fMRI: A Quantitative Evaluation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[45]  R. Gassert,et al.  MRI/fMRI-compatible robotic system with force feedback for interaction with human motion , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[46]  R. Riener,et al.  An fMRI compatible haptic interface with pneumatic actuation , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.