Local acceptance of existing biogas plants in Switzerland

After the Swiss government's decision to decommission its five nuclear power plants by 2035, energy production from wind, biomass, biogas and photovoltaic is expected to increase significantly. Due to its many aspects of a direct democracy, high levels of public acceptance are necessary if a substantial increase in new renewable energy power plants is to be achieved in Switzerland. A survey of 502 citizens living near 19 biogas plants was conducted as the basis for using structural equation modeling to measure the effects of perceived benefits, perceived costs, trust towards the plant operator, perceived smell, information received and participation options on citizens’ acceptance of “their” biogas plant. Results show that local acceptance towards existing biogas power plants is relatively high in Switzerland. Perceived benefits and costs as well as trust towards the plant operator are highly correlated and have a significant effect on local acceptance. While smell perception and information received had a significant effect on local acceptance as well, no such effect was found for participation options. Reasons for the non-impact of participation options on local acceptance are discussed, and pathways for future research are presented.

[1]  A. Jobert,et al.  Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies , 2007 .

[2]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review , 2007 .

[3]  Susan Hunter,et al.  Beyond NIMBY. Explaining Opposition to Hazardous Waste Facilities , 1995 .

[4]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[5]  N. Bronfman,et al.  Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources , 2012 .

[6]  J. Bortz.  Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler , 2010 .

[7]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Using the Language of NIMBY: A topic for research, not an activity for researchers , 2000 .

[8]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Emotion and rationality: The characterisation and evaluation of opposition to renewable energy projects , 2009 .

[9]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[10]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[11]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Janet Stephenson,et al.  Public perceptions of wind energy developments: Case studies from New Zealand , 2009 .

[13]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[14]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  ‘Green On Green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland , 2005 .

[15]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[16]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Trust, risk perception and the TCC model of cooperation , 2007 .

[17]  S. Shackley,et al.  The case of a proposed 21.5 MW(e) biomass Gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: implications for governance of renewable energy planning , 2006 .

[18]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature , 2010 .

[19]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[20]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[21]  Bishnu Raj Upreti,et al.  Conflict over biomass energy development in the United Kingdom: some observations and lessons from England and Wales , 2004 .

[22]  Joyce McLaren Loring,et al.  Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark: Factors influencing project success , 2007 .

[23]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model , 2011 .

[24]  D. Horst.  NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[25]  D. Horst,et al.  National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity plant , 2004 .

[26]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .