Decision support model with Pythagorean fuzzy preference relations and its application in financial early warnings

Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs) retain the advantages of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), while PFSs portray 1.57 times more information than IFSs. In addition, Pythagorean fuzzy preference relations (PFPRs), as a generalization of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs), are more flexible and applicable. The objective of this paper is to propose a novel decision support model for solving group decision-making problems in a Pythagorean fuzzy environment. First, we define the concepts of ordered consistency and multiplicative consistency for PFPRs. Then, aiming at the group decision-making problem of multiple PFPRs, a consistency improving model is constructed to improve the consistency of group preference relations. Later, a consensus reaching model is developed to reach the degree of group consensus. Furthermore, a decision support model with PFPRs is established to derive the normalized weights and output the final result. Holding these features, this paper builds a decision support model with PFPRs based on multiplicative consistency and consensus. Finally, the described method is validated by an example of financial risk management, and it is concluded that the solvency of a company is an important indicator that affects the financial early warning system.

[1]  S. Orlovsky Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation , 1978 .

[2]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision Making , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[3]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  Investigating rank reversal in reciprocal fuzzy preference relation based on additive consistency: Causes and solutions , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[4]  Zahid Hussian,et al.  Distance and similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric with application to fuzzy TOPSIS , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[5]  Huimin Zhang,et al.  Revisiting multiplicative consistency of interval fuzzy preference relation , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[6]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A group decision making model considering both the additive consistency and group consensus of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[7]  Sheng-Yuan Yang,et al.  A Balance Interface Design and Instant Image-based Traffic Assistant Agent Based on GPS and Linked Open Data Technology , 2019, Symmetry.

[8]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[9]  Shahzad Faizi,et al.  Decision Making with Uncertainty Using Hesitant Fuzzy Sets , 2017, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[10]  Chao Fu,et al.  Triangular bounded consistency of fuzzy preference relations , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[11]  Gui-Wu Wei,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making , 2017, Int. J. Knowl. Based Intell. Eng. Syst..

[12]  Yang Lin,et al.  Group Decision Making With Consistency of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations Under Uncertainty , 2018, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica.

[13]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[14]  Prasenjit Mandal,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy preference relations and their applications in group decision‐making systems , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[15]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Visualizing and rectifying different inconsistencies for fuzzy reciprocal preference relations , 2019, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Gang Chen,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy preference ranking organization method of enrichment evaluations , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[17]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[18]  K. Atanassov More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1989 .

[19]  Huayou Chen,et al.  Approaches to group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on multiplicative consistency , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[20]  Yafei Song,et al.  Combination of unreliable evidence sources in intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM framework , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[21]  Huayou Chen,et al.  DEA cross-efficiency and fuzzy preference relation based on semi-disposability of undesirable outputs for environmental assessments , 2020, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[22]  M. Milasi,et al.  On the study of the economic equilibrium problem through preference relations , 2019, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.

[23]  Xindong Peng,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions , 2017, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[24]  Huayou Chen,et al.  Group decision making based on DEA cross-efficiency with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations , 2018, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[25]  Yong Yang,et al.  Some Results for Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets , 2015, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[26]  Hao Wu,et al.  Collaborative Topic Regression with social trust ensemble for recommendation in social media systems , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[27]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean Membership Grades, Complex Numbers, and Decision Making , 2013, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[28]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  On Compatibility of Interval Fuzzy Preference Relations , 2004, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[29]  Gui-qiong Xu,et al.  Group decision making with incomplete intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[30]  Tahir Mahmood,et al.  On some distance measures of complex Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition , 2019, Complex & Intelligent Systems.

[31]  Xiaolu Zhang,et al.  Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: A hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[33]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[34]  Muhammad Akram,et al.  Prioritized weighted aggregation operators under complex pythagorean fuzzy information , 2020, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[35]  Xindong Peng,et al.  New similarity measure and distance measure for Pythagorean fuzzy set , 2018, Complex & Intelligent Systems.

[36]  Huchang Liao,et al.  Additive consistency‐based priority‐generating method of q‐rung orthopair fuzzy preference relation , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[37]  Jian-qiang Wang,et al.  Intuitionistic hesitant linguistic sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making problems , 2015, Operational Research.

[38]  Huayou Chen,et al.  Additive Consistency of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relation With a New Expansion Principle for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[39]  Harish Garg,et al.  Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Geometric Aggregation Operators Using Einstein t‐Norm and t‐Conorm for Multicriteria Decision‐Making Process , 2017, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[40]  Tabasam Rashid,et al.  A New Method to Support Decision-Making in an Uncertain Environment Based on Normalized Interval-Valued Triangular Fuzzy Numbers and COMET Technique , 2020, Symmetry.

[41]  Muhammad Akram,et al.  Extensions of ELECTRE-I and TOPSIS methods for group decision-making under complex Pythagorean fuzzy environment , 2020 .