EEG-based online two-dimensional cursor control

This study aims to explore whether human intentions to move or cease to move right and left hands can provide four spatiotemporal patterns in single-trial non-invasive EEG signals to achieve a two-dimensional cursor control. Subjects performed motor tasks by either physical movement or motor imagery. Spatial filtering, temporal filtering, feature selection and classification methods were explored to support accurate computer pattern recognition. The performance was evaluated by both offline classification and online two-dimensional cursor control. Event-related desynchronization (ERD) and post-movement event-related synchronization (ERS) were observed on the contralateral hemisphere to the moving hand for both physical movement and motor imagery. The offline classification of four motor tasks provided 10-fold cross-validation accuracy as high as 88% for physical movement and 73% for motor imagery. Subjects participating in experiments with physical movement were able to complete the online game with the average accuracy of 85.5±4.65%; Subjects participating in motor imagery study also completed the game successfully. The proposed brain-computer interface (BCI) provided a new practical multi-dimensional method by noninvasive EEG signal associated with human natural behavior, which does not need long-term training.

[1]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Event-related desynchronisation of central beta-rhythms during brisk and slow self-paced finger movements of dominant and nondominant hand. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[3]  M. Hallett,et al.  Asymmetric spatiotemporal patterns of event-related desynchronization preceding voluntary sequential finger movements: a high-resolution EEG study , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  H. L. Andrews,et al.  ELECTRO-ENCEPHALOGRAPHY: III. NORMAL DIFFERENTIATION OF OCCIPITAL AND PRECENTRAL REGIONS IN MAN , 1938 .

[5]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  J.R. Wolpaw,et al.  A $\mu $-Rhythm Matched Filter for Continuous Control of a Brain-Computer Interface , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J. Binder,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of complex human movements , 1993, Neurology.

[8]  M. Hallett,et al.  A high performance sensorimotor beta rhythm-based brain–computer interface associated with human natural motor behavior , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Exploration of computational methods for classification of movement intention during human voluntary movement from single trial EEG , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[12]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interface in paralysis , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[14]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  EEG-Based Communication and Control: Speed–Accuracy Relationships , 2003, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.

[15]  J. A. Wilson,et al.  Two-dimensional movement control using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.