Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using a polylactide and polyglycolide sponge as space filler: a clinical and histological study in humans.

BACKGROUND The placement of different graft materials and/or the use of occlusive membranes to cover the extraction socket entrance are techniques aimed at preserving/reducing alveolar ridge resorption. The use of grafting materials in fresh extraction sockets has, however, been questioned because particles of the grafted material have been found in alveolar sockets 6-9 months following their insertion. AIM The aims of the study were to (i). evaluate whether alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction could be prevented or reduced by the application of a bioabsorbable polylactide-polyglycolide sponge used as a space filler, compared to natural healing by clot formation, and (ii). evaluate histologically the amount and quality of bone tissue formed in the sockets, 6 months after the use of the bioabsorbable material. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-six patients, undergoing periodontal therapy, participated in this study. All patients were scheduled for extraction of one or more compromised teeth. Following elevation of full-thickness flaps and extraction of teeth, measurements were taken to evaluate the distance between three landmarks (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal) on individually prefabricated stents, and the alveolar crest. Twenty-six alveolar sockets (test) were filled with a bioabsorbable polylactide-polyglycolide acid sponge (Fisiograft), while 13 sockets (controls) were allowed to heal without any filling material. The flaps were sutured with no attempt to achieve primary closure of the surgical wound. Re-entry for implant surgery was performed 6 months following the extractions. Thirteen biopsies (10 test and three control sites) were harvested from the sites scheduled for implant placement. RESULTS The clinical measurements at 6 months revealed, in the mesial-buccal site, a loss of bone height of 0.2 mm (1.4 SD) in the test and 0.6 mm (1.1 SD) in the controls; in the mid-buccal portion a gain of 1.3 mm (1.9 SD) in the test and a loss of 0.8 mm (1.6 SD) in the controls; and in the distal portion a loss of 0.1 mm (1.1 SD) in the test and of 0.8 (1.5 SD) mm in the controls. The biopsies harvested from the test sites revealed that the new bone formed at 6 months was mineralized, mature and well structured. Particles of the grafted material could not be identified in any of the 10 test biopsies. The bone formed in the control sites was also mature and well structured. CONCLUSION The results of this study indicate that alveolar bone resorption following tooth extraction may be prevented or reduced by the use of a bioabsorbable synthetic sponge of polylactide-polyglycolide acid. The quality of bone formed seemed to be optimal for dental implant insertion.

[1]  J. Fiorellini,et al.  A feasibility study evaluating rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge device for local alveolar ridge preservation or augmentation. , 1997, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[2]  S. Froum,et al.  Histological comparison of healing extraction sockets implanted with bioactive glass or demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: a pilot study. , 2002, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  P. Klokkevold,et al.  A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  T. Berglundh,et al.  Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  A L Rosenfeld,et al.  Influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on implant fixture placement and tooth position. 1. , 1991, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[6]  H. Tal,et al.  Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  H. Moroi,et al.  Histologic evaluation of human extraction sockets treated with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and cell occlusive membrane. , 1996, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  R. Caffesse,et al.  A comparison of demineralized freeze-dried bone and autologous bone to induce bone formation in human extraction sockets. , 1994, Journal of periodontology.

[9]  J. Slots,et al.  Periodontal pathogens on polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided tissue regeneration inhibit healing. , 1995, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  W. Becker,et al.  Clinical and histologic observations of sites implanted with intraoral autologous bone grafts or allografts. 15 human case reports. , 1996, Journal of periodontology.

[11]  P. Trisi,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative comparative study on different filling materials used in bone tissue regeneration: a controlled clinical study. , 1994, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[12]  J. Ouhayoun,et al.  Bone regeneration in extraction sites after immediate placement of an e-PTFE membrane with or without a biomaterial. A report on 12 consecutive cases. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[13]  D Buser,et al.  Evaluation of filling materials in membrane--protected bone defects. A comparative histomorphometric study in the mandible of miniature pigs. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  D. Zaffe,et al.  A comparative study of the effectiveness of e-PTFE membranes with and without early exposure during the healing period. , 1994, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[15]  Brian J. Tighe,et al.  Polymers for biodegradable medical devices. 1. The potential of polyesters as controlled macromolecular release systems , 1986 .

[16]  P. Boyne Osseous reconstruction of the maxilla and the mandible , 1997 .

[17]  E. Rosenberg,et al.  The osteogenic activity of bone removed from healing extraction sockets in humans. , 1982, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  K. Selvig,et al.  Scanning electron microscopic observations of cell populations and bacterial contamination of membranes used for guided periodontal tissue regeneration in humans. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[19]  M. Urist,et al.  Histologic findings after implantation and evaluation of different grafting materials and titanium micro screws into extraction sockets: case reports. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[20]  M. Amler,et al.  Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing in undisturbed extraction wounds. , 1960, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[21]  P. Klokkevold,et al.  Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[22]  H. Haanaes,et al.  Alveolar ridge augmentation in rats by Bio-Oss. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.