A DEA cross-efficiency approach based on bargaining theory

Cross-efficiency evaluation is a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach that enables the efficiency and ranking of Decision-Making Units (DMUs) to assess the possibility of idiosyncratic weightin...

[1]  Jie Wu,et al.  DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Mohammad Askari Sajedi,et al.  Improving Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Using Fuzzy Concepts , 2012 .

[3]  Guo-liang Yang,et al.  Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Jie Wu,et al.  Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[5]  José L. Ruiz,et al.  On the DEA total weight flexibility and the aggregation in cross-efficiency evaluations , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Qiang Hou,et al.  Improved DEA Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points , 2018 .

[7]  Richard H. Silkman,et al.  Measuring efficiency : an assessment of data envelopment analysis , 1986 .

[8]  Feng Yang,et al.  Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  I. Contreras,et al.  Optimizing the rank position of the DMU as secondary goal in DEA cross-evaluation , 2012 .

[10]  T. Anderson,et al.  The Fixed Weighting Nature of A Cross-Evaluation Model , 2002 .

[11]  Jie Wu,et al.  Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation , 2008 .

[12]  C. Kao,et al.  A slacks-based measure model for calculating cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2020 .

[13]  Hong Yan,et al.  Bargaining game model in the evaluation of decision making units , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[15]  Ruiyue Lin.  Cross-efficiency evaluation capable of dealing with negative data: A directional distance function based approach , 2020, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[17]  K. Chin,et al.  Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation , 2010 .

[18]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[19]  Jie Wu,et al.  The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium , 2008, Oper. Res..

[20]  M. Zohrehbandian,et al.  Cross-efficiency Evaluation under the Principle of Rank Priority of DMUs , 2013 .

[21]  Marianela Carrillo,et al.  An alternative neutral approach for cross-efficiency evaluation , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Per J. Agrell,et al.  A flexible cross-efficiency fuzzy data envelopment analysis model for sustainable sourcing , 2017 .

[24]  Sungmook Lim,et al.  Minimax and maximin formulations of cross-efficiency in DEA , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[25]  José L. Ruiz,et al.  On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Jie Wu,et al.  Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  L. Liang,et al.  DEA cross-efficiency aggregation method based upon Shannon entropy , 2012 .

[28]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  DEA models for minimizing weight disparity in cross-efficiency evaluation , 2012, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[29]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  A cross-efficiency model based on super-efficiency for ranking units through the TOPSIS approach and its extension to the interval case , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[30]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Supplier evaluation based on Nash bargaining game model , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  J. Nash.  THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[32]  Jiasen Sun,et al.  DEA cross-efficiency evaluation considering undesirable output and ranking priority: a case study of eco-efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants , 2017 .

[33]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[34]  Jie Wu,et al.  Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross-evaluation , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Jie Wu,et al.  Extended secondary goal models for weights selection in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[37]  Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Optimising proportional weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation , 2014 .

[38]  Jie Wu,et al.  Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  E. Kalai,et al.  OTHER SOLUTIONS TO NASH'S BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1975 .

[40]  Peng Liu,et al.  A Revised Model of the Neutral DEA Model and Its Extension , 2017 .

[41]  K. Chin,et al.  The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation , 2011 .

[42]  Kurt Jörnsten,et al.  Common mistakes in computing the nucleolus , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Chengbin Chu,et al.  WITHDRAWN: A multi-objective model for Pareto optimality in data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation , 2019 .

[44]  Ying Luo,et al.  Cross-efficiency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision making units , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[45]  Kim Fung Lam,et al.  In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[46]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  An aggressive game cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[47]  John S. Liu,et al.  A survey of DEA applications , 2013 .

[48]  Lei Chen,et al.  Neutral cross-efficiency evaluation regarding an ideal frontier and anti-ideal frontier as evaluation criteria , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[49]  Liang Liang,et al.  DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings , 2009 .

[50]  Hasan Bal,et al.  Goal programming approaches for data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation , 2011, Appl. Math. Comput..

[51]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[52]  José L. Ruiz.  Cross-efficiency evaluation with directional distance functions , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[53]  Mostafa Davtalab-Olyaie,et al.  A secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation: A “one home run is much better than two doubles” criterion , 2019 .

[54]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Extending the bargaining approach to DEA target setting , 2019, Omega.

[55]  Liang Liang,et al.  DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on satisfaction degree: an application to technology selection , 2016 .

[56]  Yu Yu,et al.  DEA cross-efficiency evaluation and ranking method based on interval data , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[57]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[58]  N. Gibbs.  The choice. , 2014, Time.

[59]  Yang Liu,et al.  A MapReduce Based High Performance Neural Network in Enabling Fast Stability Assessment of Power Systems , 2017 .

[60]  José L. Ruiz,et al.  Fuzzy cross-efficiency evaluation: a possibility approach , 2017, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[61]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  A bargaining approach to determine common weights in DEA , 2019, Operational Research.