This document is intended to accomplish two highly inter-related
tasks: to establish an "initial" Internet Code Point (ICP) assignment
for each of IPv4 and IPv6 address encoding in Network Service Access
Point (NSAP) Addresses, and to recommend an IANA assignment policy for
currently unassigned ICP values. In the first task, this document is a
partial replacement for RFC 1888 -- particularly for section 6 of RFC
1888. In the second task, this document incorporates wording and
specifications from ITU-T Recommendation X.213 and further recommends
that IANA use the "IETF consensus" assignment policy in making future
ICP assignments. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
[1]
Stephen T. Kent,et al.
Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol
,
1998,
RFC.
[2]
Brian E. Carpenter.
RFC 1888 Is Obsolete
,
2005,
RFC.
[3]
Thomas Narten,et al.
Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
,
1998,
RFC.
[4]
Hugo Krawczyk,et al.
A Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol
,
1999,
IBM Syst. J..
[5]
Brian E. Carpenter,et al.
OSI NSAPs and IPv6
,
1996,
RFC.
[6]
Scott O. Bradner,et al.
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
,
1997,
RFC.