Attraction Basins as Gauges of Robustness against Boundary Conditions in Biological Complex Systems

One fundamental concept in the context of biological systems on which researches have flourished in the past decade is that of the apparent robustness of these systems, i.e., their ability to resist to perturbations or constraints induced by external or boundary elements such as electromagnetic fields acting on neural networks, micro-RNAs acting on genetic networks and even hormone flows acting both on neural and genetic networks. Recent studies have shown the importance of addressing the question of the environmental robustness of biological networks such as neural and genetic networks. In some cases, external regulatory elements can be given a relevant formal representation by assimilating them to or modeling them by boundary conditions. This article presents a generic mathematical approach to understand the influence of boundary elements on the dynamics of regulation networks, considering their attraction basins as gauges of their robustness. The application of this method on a real genetic regulation network will point out a mathematical explanation of a biological phenomenon which has only been observed experimentally until now, namely the necessity of the presence of gibberellin for the flower of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana to develop normally.

[1]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[2]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[3]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  R. Thomas,et al.  Boolean formalization of genetic control circuits. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Donald B. Johnson,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Shortest Paths in Sparse Networks , 1977, J. ACM.

[6]  Harlan W. Stech,et al.  The effect of time lags on the stability of the equilibrium state of a population growth equation , 1978 .

[7]  Eric Goles Ch.,et al.  Comportement periodique des fonctions a seuil binaires et applications , 1981, Discret. Appl. Math..

[8]  René Thomas On the Relation Between the Logical Structure of Systems and Their Ability to Generate Multiple Steady States or Sustained Oscillations , 1981 .

[9]  E. Goles Fixed Point Behavior of Threshold Functions on a Finite Set , 1982 .

[10]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Eric Goles Ch.,et al.  Transient length in sequential iteration of threshold functions , 1983, Discret. Appl. Math..

[12]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Michel Cosnard,et al.  Attracteurs: une approche déterministe , 1985 .

[14]  J. Demongeot,et al.  On the definitions of attractors , 1985 .

[15]  Randal E. Bryant,et al.  Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[16]  György Targonski,et al.  Iteration theory and its functional equations , 1988 .

[17]  Josef Stoer,et al.  Numerische Mathematik 1 , 1989 .

[18]  W S McCulloch,et al.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[19]  J. Bowman,et al.  Early flower development in Arabidopsis. , 1990, The Plant cell.

[20]  Eric Goles,et al.  Neural and automata networks , 1990 .

[21]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[22]  Randal E. Bryant,et al.  Symbolic Boolean manipulation with ordered binary-decision diagrams , 1992, CSUR.

[23]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A modified Hausdorff distance for object matching , 1994, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[24]  E. Álvarez-Buylla,et al.  Dynamics of the genetic regulatory network for Arabidopsis thaliana flower morphogenesis. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  N. Goto,et al.  Role of gibberellins in the development of floral organs of the gibberellin-deficient mutant, ga1-1, of Arabidopsis thaliana , 1999 .

[26]  Sylvain Meignen,et al.  Synchronization and desynchronization of neural oscillators , 1999, Neural Networks.

[27]  J. Demongeot,et al.  Cooperation of selection and meiotic mechanisms in the production of imbalances in reciprocal translocations , 2000, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[28]  J. Görlach,et al.  Growth Stage–Based Phenotypic Analysis of Arabidopsis , 2001, The Plant Cell Online.

[29]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean networks: a rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks , 2002, Bioinform..

[31]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Mathematical modeling in genetic networks: relationships between the genetic expression and both chromosomic breakage and positive circuits , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[32]  Elliot M Meyerowitz,et al.  Floral homeotic genes are targets of gibberellin signaling in flower development. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  A. Ehrenhofer-Murray,et al.  Chromatin dynamics at DNA replication, transcription and repair. , 2004, European journal of biochemistry.

[34]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Morphogenetic Processes: Application to Cambial Growth Dynamics , 2004, Acta biotheoretica.

[35]  Adrien Richard,et al.  Application of formal methods to biological regulatory networks: extending Thomas' asynchronous logical approach with temporal logic. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Laurent Trilling,et al.  Modeling the Molecular Network Controlling Adhesion Between Human Endothelial Cells: Inference and Simulation Using Constraint Logic Programming , 2004, CMSB.

[37]  C. Espinosa-Soto,et al.  A Gene Regulatory Network Model for Cell-Fate Determination during Arabidopsis thaliana Flower Development That Is Robust and Recovers Experimental Gene Expression Profilesw⃞ , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[38]  Eric Goles Ch.,et al.  On limit cycles of monotone functions with symmetric connection graph , 2004, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[39]  Nazim Fatès,et al.  Perturbing the topology of the Game of Life increases its robustness to asynchrony , 2004 .

[40]  Adrien Richard,et al.  Epigenesis and Dynamic Similarity in Two Regulatory Networks in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa , 2004, Acta biotheoretica.

[41]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions , 2005, Nature.

[42]  Ping Ao,et al.  Noise in a small genetic circuit that undergoes bifurcation , 2005, Complex..

[43]  Nazim Fatès,et al.  An Experimental Study of Robustness to Asynchronism for Elementary Cellular Automata , 2004, Complex Syst..

[44]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Cellular Modelling of Secondary Radial Growth in Conifer Trees: Application to Pinus Radiata (D. Don) , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[45]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Modelling of auxin transport affected by gravity and differential radial growth. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[46]  Adrien Richard,et al.  Necessary conditions for multistationarity in discrete dynamical systems , 2007, Discret. Appl. Math..

[47]  A. Benecke,et al.  Determining the impact of alternative splicing events on transcriptome dynamics , 2008, BMC Research Notes.

[48]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Interaction Motifs in Regulatory Networks and Structural Robustness , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[49]  Lubos Brim,et al.  Parallel Model Checking Large-Scale Genetic Regulatory Networks with DiVinE , 2007, FBTC@CONCUR.

[50]  Eric Goles Ch.,et al.  Comparison between parallel and serial dynamics of Boolean networks , 2008, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[51]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Boundary conditions and phase transitions in neural networks. Simulation results , 2008, Neural Networks.

[52]  S. Sené Influence des conditions de bord dans les réseaux d'automates booléens à seuil et application à la biologie , 2008 .

[53]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Petri net modelling of biological regulatory networks , 2008, J. Discrete Algorithms.

[54]  J. Aracena Maximum Number of Fixed Points in Regulatory Boolean Networks , 2008, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[55]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Boundary conditions and phase transitions in neural networks. Theoretical results , 2008, Neural Networks.

[56]  J. Demongeot,et al.  Robustness in Regulatory Networks: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach , 2008, Acta biotheoretica.

[57]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Structural Sensitivity of Neural and Genetic Networks , 2008, MICAI.

[58]  Adrien Elena,et al.  Robustesse des réseaux d'automates booléens à seuil aux modes d'itération. Application à la modélisation des réseaux de régulation génétique. (Robustness of threshold boolean automata networks to iteration modes. Application to genetic regulation network modelling) , 2009 .

[59]  Gilles Bernot,et al.  Enzymatic competition: Modeling and verification with timed hybrid petri nets , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[60]  Eric Goles Ch.,et al.  Loss of Linearity and Symmetrisation in Regulatory Networks , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[61]  Jérémie Bourdon,et al.  Temporal constraints of a gene regulatory network: Refining a qualitative simulation , 2009, Biosyst..

[62]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  On the Number of Attractors of Positive and Negative Boolean Automata Circuits , 2010, 2010 IEEE 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[63]  Ivan Junier,et al.  Spatial and Topological Organization of DNA Chains Induced by Gene Co-localization , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..