Angular differential kernel phases

To reach its optimal performance, Fizeau interferometry requires that we work to resolve instrumental biases through calibration. One common technique used in high contrast imaging is angular differential imaging, which calibrates the point spread function and flux leakage using a rotation in the focal plane. Our aim is to experimentally demonstrate and validate the efficacy of an angular differential kernel-phase approach, a new method for self-calibrating interferometric observables that operates similarly to angular differential imaging, while retaining their statistical properties. We used linear algebra to construct new observables that evolve outside of the subspace spanned by static biases. On-sky observations of a binary star with the SCExAO instrument at the Subaru telescope were used to demonstrate the practicality of this technique. We used a classical approach on the same data to compare the effectiveness of this method. The proposed method shows smaller and more Gaussian residuals compared to classical calibration methods, while retaining compatibility with the statistical tools available. We also provide a measurement of the stability of the SCExAO instrument that is relevant to the application of the technique. Angular differential kernel phases provide a reliable method for calibrating biased observables. Although the sensitivity at small separations is reduced for small field rotations, the calibration is effectively improved and the number of subjective choices is reduced.

[1]  Frantz Martinache,et al.  SCExAO, an instrument with a dual purpose: perform cutting-edge science and develop new technologies , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[2]  F. Martinache,et al.  VISUAL ORBIT OF THE LOW-MASS BINARY GJ 164 AB , 2008, 0809.0895.

[3]  Frantz Martinache,et al.  Kernel phase imaging with VLT/NACO: high-contrast detection of new candidate low-mass stellar companions at the diffraction limit , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[4]  Michael Wegner,et al.  Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , 2010 .

[5]  Stuart Shaklan,et al.  Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets VIII , 2017 .

[6]  Daniel R. Coulter,et al.  Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets III , 2007 .

[7]  B. Macintosh,et al.  Angular Differential Imaging: A Powerful High-Contrast Imaging Technique , 2005, astro-ph/0512335.

[8]  Michael J. Ireland,et al.  Phase errors in diffraction-limited imaging: contrast limits for sparse aperture masking , 2013 .

[9]  G. Perrin,et al.  The Subaru Coronagraphic Extreme Adaptive Optics System: Enabling High-Contrast Imaging on Solar-System Scales , 2015, 1507.00017.

[10]  R. Soummer,et al.  DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF EXOPLANETS AND DISKS USING PROJECTIONS ON KARHUNEN–LOÈVE EIGENIMAGES , 2012, 1207.4197.

[11]  C. A. Haniff,et al.  Closure phase in high-resolution optical imaging , 1986, Nature.

[12]  Kjetil Dohlen,et al.  Tackling down the low wind effect on SPHERE instrument , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[13]  Elliott P. Horch,et al.  OBSERVATIONS OF BINARY STARS WITH THE DIFFERENTIAL SPECKLE SURVEY INSTRUMENT. VI. MEASURES DURING 2014 AT THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL TELESCOPE , 2015, 1509.03498.

[14]  Adam Amara,et al.  PYNPOINT: An image processing package for finding exoplanets , 2012, 1207.6637.

[15]  M. Collins,et al.  THRESHING IN ACTION: THE TIDAL DISRUPTION OF A DWARF GALAXY BY THE HYDRA I CLUSTER , 2012, 1207.2762.

[16]  Frantz Martinache,et al.  KERNEL PHASE IN FIZEAU INTERFEROMETRY , 2010 .

[17]  Frantz Martinache,et al.  Mapping the Shores of the Brown Dwarf Desert. I. Upper Scorpius , 2008 .

[18]  R. Jennison A Phase Sensitive Interferometer Technique for the Measurement of the Fourier Transforms of Spatial Brightness Distributions of Small Angular Extent , 1958 .