Combining data from 43 standardized surveys to estimate densities of female American black bears by spatially explicit capture–recapture

Spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) models are gaining popularity for estimating densities of mammalian carnivores. They use spatially explicit encounter histories of individual animals to estimate a detection probability function described by two parameters: magnitude (g0), and spatial scale (σ). Carnivores exhibit heterogeneous detection probabilities and home range sizes, and exist at low densities, so g0 and σ likely vary, but field surveys often yield inadequate data to detect and model the variation. We sampled American black bears (Ursus americanus) on 43 study areas in ON, Canada, 2006–2009. We detected 713 animals 1810 times; however, study area-specific samples were sometimes small (6–34 individuals detected 13–93 times). We compared AICc values from SECR models fit to the complete data set to evaluate support for various forms of variation in g0 and σ, and to identify a parsimonious model for aggregating data among study areas to estimate detection parameters more precisely. Models that aggregated data within broad habitat classes and years were supported over those with study area-specific g0 and σ (ΔAICc ≥ 30), and precision was enhanced. Several other forms of variation in g0 and σ, including individual heterogeneity, were also supported and affected density estimates. If study design cannot eliminate detection heterogeneity, it should ensure that samples are sufficient to detect and model it. Where this is not feasible, combing sparse data across multiple surveys could allow for improved inference.

[1]  D. McCullough,et al.  Wildlife 2001: Populations , 1996 .

[2]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Use of Spatial Capture‐Recapture Modeling and DNA Data to Estimate Densities of Elusive Animals , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[3]  Qamar Qureshi,et al.  Density of tiger and leopard in a tropical deciduous forest of Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, southern India, as estimated using photographic capture–recapture sampling , 2011, Acta Theriologica.

[4]  G. B. Kolenosky Reproductive Biology of Black Bears in East-Central Ontario , 1990 .

[5]  J. D. Clark,et al.  Estimating black bear population density and genetic diversity at Tensas River, Louisiana using microsatellite DNA markers , 2003 .

[6]  M. Conroy,et al.  Modeling demographic processes in marked populations , 2009 .

[7]  D. Garshelis,et al.  Activity of Black Bears in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park , 1980 .

[8]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[9]  J. Rowe,et al.  Forest regions of Canada. , 1972 .

[10]  Brian P. Dreher,et al.  Noninvasive Estimation of Black Bear Abundance Incorporating Genotyping Errors and Harvested Bear , 2007 .

[11]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations. , 1984 .

[12]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations , 1983 .

[13]  J. Nichols,et al.  IMPROVING INFERENCES IN POPULATION STUDIES OF RARE SPECIES THAT ARE DETECTED IMPERFECTLY , 2005 .

[14]  J. S. Lindzey,et al.  Dynamics of Home Range and Movements of Adult Black Bears in Northeastern Pennsylvania , 1980 .

[15]  Shirley Pledger,et al.  The Performance of Mixture Models in Heterogeneous Closed Population Capture–Recapture , 2005, Biometrics.

[16]  L. Rogers Effects of Food Supply and Kinship on Social Behavior Movements and Population Growth of Black Bears in Northeastern Minnesota USA , 1987 .

[17]  Margaret F. Kinnaird,et al.  Density estimation of sympatric carnivores using spatially explicit capture–recapture methods and standard trapping grid , 2011 .

[18]  Gary C. White,et al.  Brown and black bear density estimation in Alaska using radiotelemetry and replicated mark-resight techniques , 1997 .

[19]  C. M. Costello The spatial ecology and mating system of black bears (Ursus americanus) in New Mexico , 2008 .

[20]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Mixture Models for Estimating the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Rates Vary among Individuals , 2003, Biometrics.

[21]  Kevin S. McKelvey,et al.  Population estimation with sparse data: the role of estimators versus indices revisited , 2001 .

[22]  Jerrold L. Belant,et al.  American black bear population size and genetic diversity at Apostle Islands National Lakeshore , 2005 .

[23]  PelletierA.,et al.  Delineating genetic groupings in continuously distributed species across largely homogeneous landscapes: a study of American black bears (Ursus americanus) in Ontario, Canada , 2012 .

[24]  Brian D. Gerber,et al.  Evaluating the potential biases in carnivore capture–recapture studies associated with the use of lure and varying density estimation techniques using photographic-sampling data of the Malagasy civet , 2011, Population Ecology.

[25]  S. Lazic,et al.  Model based Inference in the Life Sciences: a Primer on Evidence , 2011 .

[26]  M. Obbard,et al.  Genetic relatedness and home-range overlap among female black bears (Ursus americanus) in northern Ontario, Canada , 1998 .

[27]  Allan F. O'Connell,et al.  Comparison of density estimation methods for mammal populations with camera traps in the Kaa‐Iya del Gran Chaco landscape , 2012 .

[28]  Rebecca J. Foster,et al.  A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data† , 2012 .

[29]  K. Burnham,et al.  Comparison of model building and selection strategies , 2010, Journal of Ornithology.

[30]  S. Pledger Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures , 2000, Biometrics.

[31]  Gary C. White,et al.  Correcting wildlife counts using detection probabilities , 2005 .

[32]  F. Lindzey,et al.  Responses of a Black Bear Population to a Changing Environment , 1986 .

[33]  L. Boitani,et al.  Bridging the gaps between non-invasive genetic sampling and population parameter estimation , 2011, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[34]  Murray G Efford,et al.  Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches. , 2011, Ecology.

[35]  Jerrold L. Belant,et al.  How Does Spatial Study Design Influence Density Estimates from Spatial Capture-Recapture Models? , 2012, PloS one.

[36]  K. ESTIMATING TIGER Panthera tigris POPULATIONS FROM CAMERA-TRAP DATA USING CAPTURE RECAPTURE MODELS , 2022 .

[37]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in black bear populations , 1994, Molecular ecology.

[38]  D. Garshelis,et al.  Seasonal migrations of black bears (Ursus americanus): causes and consequences , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[39]  Felix Knauer,et al.  Individual heterogeneity as a pitfall in population estimates based on non-invasive genetic sampling: a review and recommendations , 2010 .

[40]  A META-ANALYSIS OF GRIZZLY BEAR DNA MARK-RECAPTURE PROJECTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA , CANADA INVITED , 2007 .

[41]  D. Garshelis Mark-Recapture Density Estimation for Animals with Large Home Ranges , 1992 .

[42]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Grizzly Ursus arctos and black bear U. americanus densities in the interior mountains of North America , 2005 .

[43]  Jerrold L. Belant,et al.  Carnivore Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques , 2013 .

[44]  D. Pierce,et al.  BLACK BEAR HOME-RANGE SIZES IN WASHINGTON: CLIMATIC, VEGETATIVE, AND SOCIAL INFLUENCES , 2003 .

[45]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models. , 2009, Ecology.

[46]  Christopher J. Kyle,et al.  Empirical comparison of density estimators for large carnivores , 2010 .

[47]  P. Lukacs,et al.  Review of capture–recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[48]  David Paetkau,et al.  Genetic tagging of free-ranging black and brown bears , 1999 .

[49]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  A capture-recapture model with heterogeneity and behavioural response , 1995, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[50]  R. Hamilton Walking With Bears , 2001 .

[51]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  SOURCES OF HETEROGENEITY BIAS WHEN DNA MARK-RECAPTURE SAMPLING METHODS ARE APPLIED TO GRIZZLY BEAR (URSUS ARCTOS) POPULATIONS , 2004 .

[52]  I. Stirling,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[53]  W. Link Nonidentifiability of Population Size from Capture‐Recapture Data with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities , 2003, Biometrics.

[54]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  An empirical test of DNA mark–recapture sampling strategies for grizzly bears , 2006 .

[55]  J. Wooding Home range, habitat use, and mortality of black bears in north-central Florida , 1994 .

[56]  T. Saitoh,et al.  Microsatellites in the hermaphroditic snail, Lymnaea truncatula, intermediate host of the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[57]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies. , 2009, Ecology.

[58]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Density Estimation in a Wolverine Population using Spatial Capture-Recapture Models , 2011 .

[59]  G. Singleton,et al.  Abundance estimators and truth: Accounting for individual heterogeneity in wild house mice , 2003 .

[60]  J. Boulanger,et al.  A multiple data source approach to improve abundance estimates of small populations: The brown bear in the Apennines, Italy , 2012 .

[61]  Rahel Sollmann,et al.  Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: Accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture–recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil , 2011 .

[62]  Paul B Conn,et al.  Estimating the abundance of mouse populations of known size: promises and pitfalls of new methods. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[63]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  DENSITY: software for analysing capture-recapture data from passive detector arrays , 2004, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[64]  D L Borchers,et al.  Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies , 2008, Biometrics.

[65]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Density Estimation by Spatially Explicit Capture–Recapture: Likelihood-Based Methods , 2009 .

[66]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data: comment. , 2011, Ecology.

[67]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating Black Bear Density Using DNA Data From Hair Snares , 2010 .

[68]  L. Waits,et al.  Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[69]  E. Howe,et al.  Demography of Black Bears in Hunted and Unhunted Areas of the Boreal Forest of Ontario , 2008 .

[70]  R. G. Anthony,et al.  Estimation of Black Bear Abundance Using a Discrete DNA Sampling Device , 2008 .

[71]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[72]  T. Gray,et al.  Leopard density in post‐conflict landscape, Cambodia: Evidence from spatially explicit capture–recapture , 2012 .

[73]  Lee R. Dice,et al.  Some Census Methods for Mammals , 1938 .

[74]  N. Fowler DENSITY-DEPENDENT POPULATION REGULATION IN A , 1986 .

[75]  M. Efford Density estimation in live‐trapping studies , 2004 .

[76]  John W. Zimmerman,et al.  Ecology and Behaviour of North American Black Bears: Home Ranges, Habitat and Social Organization , 1996 .

[77]  S. Ennis,et al.  A PCR-based sex-determination assay in cattle based on the bovine amelogenin locus. , 2009, Animal genetics.

[78]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Importance of Accounting for Detection Heterogeneity When Estimating Abundance: the Case of French Wolves , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[79]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Ecological investigations of grizzly bears in Canada using DNA from hair, 1995–2005: a review of methods and progress , 2010 .

[80]  M. Boyce,et al.  Effects of hunting on demographic parameters of American black bears , 2007 .