Transforming roles of public extension to strengthen innovation: lessons from Bangladesh.

The rapidly evolving nature of agricultural innovation processes in developing countries requires agricultural extension to make necessary transformations of classical roles that previously supported linear knowledge circulation and adoption. New ways of conducting extension activities are emerging that involve facilitation of interactive communication among multiple stakeholders and a wide range of intermediation tasks within (and between) stakeholders operating in different social spheres. Drawing on lessons from an agricultural extension for development project in Bangladesh we examine whether and how the public-sector agricultural extension agency has transformed its roles in order to strengthen agricultural innovaion as an outcome of effective functioning of innovation systems and collective actions. The findings suggest that agricultural extension projects miss the opportunity to deliver extension services as collective and systemic functions. We argue that this is due to institutions that curb the agricultural innovation system function within the linear paradigm of technology transfer, under-estimation and depreciation of intermediary roles of extension personnel (e.g. brokering, negotiating, convening), and inability to foresee 'extension methods (e.g. training, demonstration)' as facilitation of learning and knowledge embedding processes.

[1]  M'Randa R. Sandlin,et al.  Agricultural Innovation Systems: An Investment Sourcebook , 2014 .

[2]  N. Röling,et al.  An innovation systems approach to institutional change: Smallholder development in West Africa , 2012 .

[3]  Md. Mofakkarul Islam,et al.  Developing Sustainable Farmer-led Extension Groups: Lessons from a Bangladeshi Case Study , 2011 .

[4]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Beyond the conventional boundaries of knowledge management: navigating the emergent pathways of learning and innovation for international development , 2011 .

[5]  M. Moniruzzaman Group Management and Empowerment , 2011 .

[6]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems , 2011 .

[7]  Jim Woodhill,et al.  Sustainability, Social Learning and the Democratic Imperative: Lessons from the Australian Landcare Movement , 2010 .

[8]  V. Rasheed Sulaiman,et al.  Extension: Object of Reform, Engine for Innovation , 2009 .

[9]  A. Wals,et al.  Competence Challenges of Demand-Led Agricultural Research and Extension in Uganda , 2009 .

[10]  Laxmi Prasad Pant,et al.  Innovations systems in renewable natural resource management and sustainable agriculture : a literature review , 2009 .

[11]  Nathalie Couix,et al.  Learning in Agriculture: Rural Development Agents in France Caught between a Job Identity and a Professional Identity , 2007 .

[12]  A. V. D. Ban,et al.  Changing Roles of Agricultural Extension In Asian Nations , 2006 .

[13]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Enhancing agricultural innovation : how to go beyond the strengthening of research systems , 2006 .

[14]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: an innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it , 2005 .

[15]  M. Waithaka Communication for rural innovation: rethinking agricultural extension , 2005 .

[16]  A. Hall,et al.  Extension Policy at the National Level in Asia , 2005 .

[17]  A. Hall,et al.  Innovations in Innovation: Reflections on Partnership, Institutions and Learning. Crop Post-Harvest Programme, South Asia, International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi. , 2004 .

[18]  G. Shivakoti,et al.  Managing System within a Non-systemic Vicious Circle: Institutional Linkage Analysis to Identify the Constraints of Technology Transfer and Adoption under Crop Diversification Programme in Bangladesh , 2001 .