VR-Enabled Telepresence as a Bridge for People, Environments, and Experiences

Rather than thinking of Virtual Reality (VR) as enabling geo-distant people to go to a common place, we have a more expansive view of VR as a bridge between people, environments, and experiences. We are interested in using VR and the related technology of Augmented Reality (AR), as tools to(1)bring a distant part of the physical world to someone, and (2) bring someone to a distant part of the physical world. This workshop paper discusses two design explorations we conducted to explore these subtle but important distinctions. We first discuss a unidirectional VR robotic telepresence interface that immerses a remote user in a distant environment, which was investigated for its value in outdoor exploration. We then discuss a bi-directional asymmetric VR-AR system that adds a photorealistic avatar for the remote user on to VR robotic telepresence. The avatar is viewed in third person by the local user as superimposed over the robot, and viewed in first person by the remote user. While the underlying technologies still need much development, we see promise in the ‘VR as bridge’ concept as a way to open up the design space to a critical need for flexible, diverse, and inclusive user needs. CHI2020 Social VR Workshop This workshop is intended to raise interdisciplinary discussions regarding technology, evaluation protocols, interaction techniques, applications, research ethics and legal regulations for social VR as an emerging immersive remote communication tool.

[1]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  How Display Shapes Affect 360-Degree Panoramic Video Communication , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[2]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Is it a game? Evidence for social influence in the virtual world , 2009 .

[3]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  OmniGlobe: An Interactive I/O System For Symmetric 360-Degree Video Communication , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[4]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Teledrone: Shared Outdoor Exploration Using Telepresence Drones , 2019, CSCW Companion.

[5]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  Dennis Proffitt,et al.  Quantifying immersion in virtual reality , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[7]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[8]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Elevating Communication, Collaboration, and Shared Experiences in Mobile Video through Drones , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[9]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Possible Worlds: The Social Dynamic of Virtual Reality Technology , 1996 .

[10]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[11]  Sean Rintel,et al.  VROOM: Virtual Robot Overlay for Online Meetings , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  J. Gee Video Games and Embodiment , 2008, Games Cult..

[13]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  Sally Hong,et al.  The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[15]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Presence: Where Are We? , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[16]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Virtual Reality: How Much Immersion Is Enough? , 2007, Computer.

[17]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Making virtual environments compelling , 2003, CACM.

[18]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Collaboration with 360° Videochat: Challenges and Opportunities , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[19]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Geocaching with a Beam: Shared Outdoor Activities through a Telepresence Robot with 360 Degree Viewing , 2018, CHI.