What Scientific Thinking Reveals About the Nature of Cognition

The mental processes underlying scientific thinking and discovery have been investigated by cognitive psychologists, educators, and creativity researchers for over half a century. Despite this wide interest in scientific thinking, the field has been regarded as an intriguing offshoot of cognitive psychology that provides scientific cover stories for theories of analogy, concept acquisition, problem solving, and cognitive development rather than revealing something new about the nature of cognition. In this chapter, I will provide a summary of recent research that we have conducted on scientific thinking and I will argue that this research provides a new perspective on the ways that basic cognitive processes function. Thus, scientific thinking allows us to understand complex cognition and generate new models of basic cognitive processes that have eluded researchers using arbitrary and simple stimuli that are commonly used in psychology experiments. Rather than being an offshoot of mainstream cognitive theories, I will propose that scientific thinking is a paradigmatic example of cognition that reveals the key features of many basic cognitive processes. Recent research on the nature of scientific thinking has implications not only for theories of cognition, but also for both the content and practice of science education.

[1]  M. Cole Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[2]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Constraints on the experimental design process in real-world science , 1996 .

[3]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  K. Dunbar How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. , 1997 .

[5]  K. Dunbar,et al.  How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[6]  W. Ahn,et al.  Causal Attribution as a Search for Underlying Mechanisms: An Explanation of the Conjunction Fallacy and the Discounting Principle , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  U. Neisser Cognition and reality: principles and implications , 1976 .

[8]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[9]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Judging probable cause. , 1986 .

[10]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[11]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[12]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Toward a general theory of expertise : prospects and limits , 1991 .

[13]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  Studies of Scientific Discovery: Complementary Approaches and Convergent Findings , 1999 .

[15]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Experimental design heuristics for scientific discovery: the use of "baseline" and "known standard" controls , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  On Scientific Thinking , 1981 .

[17]  Barbara A. Spellman,et al.  Acting as Intuitive Scientists: Contingency Judgments Are Made While Controlling for Alternative Potential Causes , 1996 .

[18]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[19]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science , 1992 .

[20]  K. Dunbar HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .

[21]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[22]  E. Brunswik Organismic achievement and environmental probability. , 1943 .

[23]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[24]  R. Giere Cognitive Models of Science , 1992 .

[25]  G. Mason Analogies Out of the Blue : When History Seems to Retell Itself , 2000 .

[26]  K. Dunbar The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. , 2001 .

[27]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[28]  Beate Sodian,et al.  Young Children's Differentiation of Hypothetical Beliefs from Evidence. , 1991 .

[29]  Tom Johnston,et al.  MacSHAPA and the enterprise of exploratory sequential data analysis (ESDA) , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  L. Frank The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[31]  Gregory J. Feist,et al.  The Psychology of Science : Review and Integration of a Nascent Discipline , 1998 .